发育障碍样本中GARS-2的因子结构、内部一致性和筛选敏感性

Martin A. Volker, Elissa H. Dua, C. Lopata, M. Thomeer, J. Toomey, A. Smerbeck, Jonathan D. Rodgers, Joshua R. Popkin, Andrew T. Nelson, Gloria K. Lee
{"title":"发育障碍样本中GARS-2的因子结构、内部一致性和筛选敏感性","authors":"Martin A. Volker, Elissa H. Dua, C. Lopata, M. Thomeer, J. Toomey, A. Smerbeck, Jonathan D. Rodgers, Joshua R. Popkin, Andrew T. Nelson, Gloria K. Lee","doi":"10.1155/2016/8243079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Gilliam Autism Rating Scale-Second Edition (GARS-2) is a widely used screening instrument that assists in the identification and diagnosis of autism. The purpose of this study was to examine the factor structure, internal consistency, and screening sensitivity of the GARS-2 using ratings from special education teaching staff for a sample of 240 individuals with autism or other significant developmental disabilities. Exploratory factor analysis yielded a correlated three-factor solution similar to that found in 2005 by Lecavalier for the original GARS. Though the three factors appeared to be reasonably consistent with the intended constructs of the three GARS-2 subscales, the analysis indicated that more than a third of the GARS-2 items were assigned to the wrong subscale. Internal consistency estimates met or exceeded standards for screening and were generally higher than those in previous studies. Screening sensitivity was .65 and specificity was .81 for the Autism Index using a cut score of 85. Based on these findings, recommendations are made for instrument revision.","PeriodicalId":8659,"journal":{"name":"Autism Research and Treatment","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factor Structure, Internal Consistency, and Screening Sensitivity of the GARS-2 in a Developmental Disabilities Sample\",\"authors\":\"Martin A. Volker, Elissa H. Dua, C. Lopata, M. Thomeer, J. Toomey, A. Smerbeck, Jonathan D. Rodgers, Joshua R. Popkin, Andrew T. Nelson, Gloria K. Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2016/8243079\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Gilliam Autism Rating Scale-Second Edition (GARS-2) is a widely used screening instrument that assists in the identification and diagnosis of autism. The purpose of this study was to examine the factor structure, internal consistency, and screening sensitivity of the GARS-2 using ratings from special education teaching staff for a sample of 240 individuals with autism or other significant developmental disabilities. Exploratory factor analysis yielded a correlated three-factor solution similar to that found in 2005 by Lecavalier for the original GARS. Though the three factors appeared to be reasonably consistent with the intended constructs of the three GARS-2 subscales, the analysis indicated that more than a third of the GARS-2 items were assigned to the wrong subscale. Internal consistency estimates met or exceeded standards for screening and were generally higher than those in previous studies. Screening sensitivity was .65 and specificity was .81 for the Autism Index using a cut score of 85. Based on these findings, recommendations are made for instrument revision.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8659,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Autism Research and Treatment\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Autism Research and Treatment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/8243079\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Autism Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/8243079","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

摘要

Gilliam自闭症评定量表-第二版(gar -2)是一种广泛使用的筛查工具,有助于自闭症的识别和诊断。本研究的目的是利用特殊教育教师对240名自闭症或其他显著发育障碍患者的评分,考察gar -2的因素结构、内部一致性和筛选敏感性。探索性因素分析产生了一个相关的三因素解决方案,类似于2005年Lecavalier对原始GARS的发现。虽然这三个因素似乎与三个gar -2子量表的预期结构合理一致,但分析表明,超过三分之一的gar -2项目被分配到错误的子量表。内部一致性估计达到或超过筛查标准,通常高于以前的研究。自闭症指数的筛查敏感性为0.65,特异性为0.81,切分值为85。根据这些发现,对文书的修订提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Factor Structure, Internal Consistency, and Screening Sensitivity of the GARS-2 in a Developmental Disabilities Sample
The Gilliam Autism Rating Scale-Second Edition (GARS-2) is a widely used screening instrument that assists in the identification and diagnosis of autism. The purpose of this study was to examine the factor structure, internal consistency, and screening sensitivity of the GARS-2 using ratings from special education teaching staff for a sample of 240 individuals with autism or other significant developmental disabilities. Exploratory factor analysis yielded a correlated three-factor solution similar to that found in 2005 by Lecavalier for the original GARS. Though the three factors appeared to be reasonably consistent with the intended constructs of the three GARS-2 subscales, the analysis indicated that more than a third of the GARS-2 items were assigned to the wrong subscale. Internal consistency estimates met or exceeded standards for screening and were generally higher than those in previous studies. Screening sensitivity was .65 and specificity was .81 for the Autism Index using a cut score of 85. Based on these findings, recommendations are made for instrument revision.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
21 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信