石灰稳定夯土最佳掺量及强度发展的试验评价

Q4 Engineering
F. Ávila, E. Puertas, R. Gallego
{"title":"石灰稳定夯土最佳掺量及强度发展的试验评价","authors":"F. Ávila, E. Puertas, R. Gallego","doi":"10.2495/cmem-v9-n3-238-248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The increasing resource consumption, waste generation, and carbon footprint in the construction sector has drawn the attention of builders and researchers to alternative sustainable construction techniques and materials, such as rammed earth (RE). The mechanical behavior of RE is often enhanced through the use of diverse additives; although cement is probably the most common one, lime stabilization provides some important advantages, representing a more efficient and environmentally friendly solution with a long tradition in the improvement of the mechanical and hydraulic behavior of earthen materials. However, there are still several aspects regarding the effect of lime stabilization in RE mechanical properties that have not been thoroughly evaluated. In this regard, the present study analyze two of the main parameters concerning lime-stabilized rammed earth (LSRE), which are essential to ensure the correct use of this technique: the optimum lime content and the curing time. Several RE specimens with different lime contents, from 0 to 18% by weight, were manufactured and subjected to unconfined compression tests in order to obtain and compare their uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) and elastic modulus. An optimum lime content equal to 12% was obtained. Then, more LSRE samples with 12% lime were manufactured and tested at increasing curing times during 100 days to evaluate the development of their strength and stiffness. The results showed a logarithmic growth of both the UCS and the elastic modulus, with the majority of the strength (over 80%) developed during the first 30 days. In addition, non-destructive ultrasonic pulse velocity tests were carried out on the samples, proving to be a useful tool for predicting the mechanical properties of the material without damaging the specimens.","PeriodicalId":36958,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Computational Methods and Experimental Measurements","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experimental evaluation of the optimum lime content and strength development of lime-stabilized rammed earth\",\"authors\":\"F. Ávila, E. Puertas, R. Gallego\",\"doi\":\"10.2495/cmem-v9-n3-238-248\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The increasing resource consumption, waste generation, and carbon footprint in the construction sector has drawn the attention of builders and researchers to alternative sustainable construction techniques and materials, such as rammed earth (RE). The mechanical behavior of RE is often enhanced through the use of diverse additives; although cement is probably the most common one, lime stabilization provides some important advantages, representing a more efficient and environmentally friendly solution with a long tradition in the improvement of the mechanical and hydraulic behavior of earthen materials. However, there are still several aspects regarding the effect of lime stabilization in RE mechanical properties that have not been thoroughly evaluated. In this regard, the present study analyze two of the main parameters concerning lime-stabilized rammed earth (LSRE), which are essential to ensure the correct use of this technique: the optimum lime content and the curing time. Several RE specimens with different lime contents, from 0 to 18% by weight, were manufactured and subjected to unconfined compression tests in order to obtain and compare their uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) and elastic modulus. An optimum lime content equal to 12% was obtained. Then, more LSRE samples with 12% lime were manufactured and tested at increasing curing times during 100 days to evaluate the development of their strength and stiffness. The results showed a logarithmic growth of both the UCS and the elastic modulus, with the majority of the strength (over 80%) developed during the first 30 days. In addition, non-destructive ultrasonic pulse velocity tests were carried out on the samples, proving to be a useful tool for predicting the mechanical properties of the material without damaging the specimens.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36958,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Computational Methods and Experimental Measurements\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Computational Methods and Experimental Measurements\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2495/cmem-v9-n3-238-248\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Computational Methods and Experimental Measurements","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2495/cmem-v9-n3-238-248","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

建筑行业不断增加的资源消耗、废物产生和碳足迹引起了建筑商和研究人员对可替代的可持续建筑技术和材料的关注,例如夯土(RE)。稀土的力学性能通常通过使用不同的添加剂得到增强;虽然水泥可能是最常见的一种,但石灰稳定提供了一些重要的优势,代表了一种更有效、更环保的解决方案,在改善土材料的机械和水力性能方面有着悠久的传统。然而,关于石灰稳定剂对稀土力学性能的影响,仍有几个方面没有得到充分的评价。在这方面,本研究分析了石灰稳定夯土(LSRE)的两个主要参数,这两个参数是确保正确使用该技术所必需的:最佳石灰含量和养护时间。制作了几种石灰含量从0到18%不等的RE试样,进行无侧限压缩试验,以获得并比较它们的单轴抗压强度(UCS)和弹性模量。石灰的最佳掺量为12%。然后,制作更多的含12%石灰的LSRE样品,并在100天内增加固化时间进行测试,以评估其强度和刚度的发展。结果表明,UCS和弹性模量均呈对数增长,其中大部分强度(超过80%)在前30天内形成。此外,对样品进行了非破坏性超声脉冲速度测试,证明了在不破坏样品的情况下预测材料力学性能的有用工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Experimental evaluation of the optimum lime content and strength development of lime-stabilized rammed earth
The increasing resource consumption, waste generation, and carbon footprint in the construction sector has drawn the attention of builders and researchers to alternative sustainable construction techniques and materials, such as rammed earth (RE). The mechanical behavior of RE is often enhanced through the use of diverse additives; although cement is probably the most common one, lime stabilization provides some important advantages, representing a more efficient and environmentally friendly solution with a long tradition in the improvement of the mechanical and hydraulic behavior of earthen materials. However, there are still several aspects regarding the effect of lime stabilization in RE mechanical properties that have not been thoroughly evaluated. In this regard, the present study analyze two of the main parameters concerning lime-stabilized rammed earth (LSRE), which are essential to ensure the correct use of this technique: the optimum lime content and the curing time. Several RE specimens with different lime contents, from 0 to 18% by weight, were manufactured and subjected to unconfined compression tests in order to obtain and compare their uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) and elastic modulus. An optimum lime content equal to 12% was obtained. Then, more LSRE samples with 12% lime were manufactured and tested at increasing curing times during 100 days to evaluate the development of their strength and stiffness. The results showed a logarithmic growth of both the UCS and the elastic modulus, with the majority of the strength (over 80%) developed during the first 30 days. In addition, non-destructive ultrasonic pulse velocity tests were carried out on the samples, proving to be a useful tool for predicting the mechanical properties of the material without damaging the specimens.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
33 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信