拉丁美洲大学法学专业哲学基础课程研究趋势

IF 0.6 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
C. P. Pérez Fuentes, Nataly Restrepo Restrepo, Annie Julieth Álvarez Maestre
{"title":"拉丁美洲大学法学专业哲学基础课程研究趋势","authors":"C. P. Pérez Fuentes, Nataly Restrepo Restrepo, Annie Julieth Álvarez Maestre","doi":"10.5354/0719-5885.2022.66360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This literature review article aims to make a theoretical approximation of the state of the art for the study entitled «Analysis of the curricular foundation of law programs in Latin America». This, with the aim of identifying the philosophical tendencies that underlie the curricular studies of university academic programs and in thecontext of the curricular studies that are carried out in law programs. The methodology used in this research is developed through a qualitative approach that seeks to understand the reality expressed by human acts, through a hermeneutic method that seeks to understand said acts expressed as texts as an integrated whole. As a result, it was possible to show that curricular studies related to the philosophical foundation in curricular design are not common, since these studies focus mainly on the search for relevance and curricular coherence. Most studies of curricular design in legal pedagogy focus on training by competencies that respond to social, market and self-realization demands of individuals.","PeriodicalId":42975,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Pedagogia Universitaria y Didactica del Derecho","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trends in curriculum studies on the philosophical foundation of university Law programs in Latin America\",\"authors\":\"C. P. Pérez Fuentes, Nataly Restrepo Restrepo, Annie Julieth Álvarez Maestre\",\"doi\":\"10.5354/0719-5885.2022.66360\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This literature review article aims to make a theoretical approximation of the state of the art for the study entitled «Analysis of the curricular foundation of law programs in Latin America». This, with the aim of identifying the philosophical tendencies that underlie the curricular studies of university academic programs and in thecontext of the curricular studies that are carried out in law programs. The methodology used in this research is developed through a qualitative approach that seeks to understand the reality expressed by human acts, through a hermeneutic method that seeks to understand said acts expressed as texts as an integrated whole. As a result, it was possible to show that curricular studies related to the philosophical foundation in curricular design are not common, since these studies focus mainly on the search for relevance and curricular coherence. Most studies of curricular design in legal pedagogy focus on training by competencies that respond to social, market and self-realization demands of individuals.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42975,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de Pedagogia Universitaria y Didactica del Derecho\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de Pedagogia Universitaria y Didactica del Derecho\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5354/0719-5885.2022.66360\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Pedagogia Universitaria y Didactica del Derecho","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5354/0719-5885.2022.66360","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文献综述文章旨在对题为“拉丁美洲法律项目课程基础分析”的研究现状进行理论近似。这样做的目的是确定大学学术课程研究的哲学倾向,以及在法律课程中进行的课程研究的背景下。本研究中使用的方法论是通过一种定性方法来发展的,这种方法试图理解人类行为所表达的现实,通过一种解释学方法,试图理解作为文本表达的上述行为作为一个整体。因此,有可能表明,与课程设计的哲学基础相关的课程研究并不常见,因为这些研究主要侧重于寻找相关性和课程一致性。法律教育学课程设计的大多数研究侧重于对个人的社会、市场和自我实现需求的能力培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Trends in curriculum studies on the philosophical foundation of university Law programs in Latin America
This literature review article aims to make a theoretical approximation of the state of the art for the study entitled «Analysis of the curricular foundation of law programs in Latin America». This, with the aim of identifying the philosophical tendencies that underlie the curricular studies of university academic programs and in thecontext of the curricular studies that are carried out in law programs. The methodology used in this research is developed through a qualitative approach that seeks to understand the reality expressed by human acts, through a hermeneutic method that seeks to understand said acts expressed as texts as an integrated whole. As a result, it was possible to show that curricular studies related to the philosophical foundation in curricular design are not common, since these studies focus mainly on the search for relevance and curricular coherence. Most studies of curricular design in legal pedagogy focus on training by competencies that respond to social, market and self-realization demands of individuals.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
50.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信