澳大利亚的应计异常:对交易策略回报的进一步观察

Stephen L Taylor, Leon Wong
{"title":"澳大利亚的应计异常:对交易策略回报的进一步观察","authors":"Stephen L Taylor, Leon Wong","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1635610","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We conduct a detailed examination of the accrual anomaly in Australia using a trading strategy research design. Our primary contribution is to show how sensitive the results are to the precise research design specifications. We focus on four key areas of importance in designing such tests. First, the choice of proxy for total accruals; second, the definition of abnormal returns (i.e., the return generating model); third, the impact of data trimming as a response to exceptionally large returns; and fourth, the choice between value or equal weighting of returns. We show that research design choices do matter, and in doing so we also provide some reconciliation of apparently conflicting prior evidence of any accrual anomaly in Australia. Our results suggest the need for caution in drawing inferences from specific research design specifications in trading strategy tests of the accrual anomaly.","PeriodicalId":23435,"journal":{"name":"UNSW Business School Research Paper Series","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Accrual Anomaly in Australia: A Closer Look at Trading Strategy Returns\",\"authors\":\"Stephen L Taylor, Leon Wong\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1635610\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We conduct a detailed examination of the accrual anomaly in Australia using a trading strategy research design. Our primary contribution is to show how sensitive the results are to the precise research design specifications. We focus on four key areas of importance in designing such tests. First, the choice of proxy for total accruals; second, the definition of abnormal returns (i.e., the return generating model); third, the impact of data trimming as a response to exceptionally large returns; and fourth, the choice between value or equal weighting of returns. We show that research design choices do matter, and in doing so we also provide some reconciliation of apparently conflicting prior evidence of any accrual anomaly in Australia. Our results suggest the need for caution in drawing inferences from specific research design specifications in trading strategy tests of the accrual anomaly.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23435,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"UNSW Business School Research Paper Series\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"UNSW Business School Research Paper Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1635610\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"UNSW Business School Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1635610","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

我们使用交易策略研究设计对澳大利亚的应计异常进行了详细检查。我们的主要贡献是显示结果对精确的研究设计规范有多敏感。在设计此类测试时,我们着重于四个重要的关键领域。首先,应计总额代理的选择;二是异常收益的定义(即收益产生模型);第三,作为对异常高回报的回应,数据修剪的影响;第四,是价值回报还是等权重回报的选择。我们表明,研究设计选择确实很重要,在此过程中,我们还对澳大利亚任何应计异常的明显冲突的先前证据提供了一些调和。我们的结果表明,需要谨慎地从具体的研究设计规范,在交易策略测试的应计异常的推论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Accrual Anomaly in Australia: A Closer Look at Trading Strategy Returns
We conduct a detailed examination of the accrual anomaly in Australia using a trading strategy research design. Our primary contribution is to show how sensitive the results are to the precise research design specifications. We focus on four key areas of importance in designing such tests. First, the choice of proxy for total accruals; second, the definition of abnormal returns (i.e., the return generating model); third, the impact of data trimming as a response to exceptionally large returns; and fourth, the choice between value or equal weighting of returns. We show that research design choices do matter, and in doing so we also provide some reconciliation of apparently conflicting prior evidence of any accrual anomaly in Australia. Our results suggest the need for caution in drawing inferences from specific research design specifications in trading strategy tests of the accrual anomaly.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信