T. NAKAMURA, M. YOSHIDA, Y. OTANI, K. KAMEYAMA, H. ISHIKAWA, K. KUMAI, T. KUBOTA, Y. SAIKAWA, M. KITAJIMA
{"title":"胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔手术12年进展:腹腔镜手术指征、术后病程及念珠菌感染影响的回顾性研究","authors":"T. NAKAMURA, M. YOSHIDA, Y. OTANI, K. KAMEYAMA, H. ISHIKAWA, K. KUMAI, T. KUBOTA, Y. SAIKAWA, M. KITAJIMA","doi":"10.1111/j.1746-6342.2006.00060.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Summary</h3>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Twelve years has passed since we introduced laparoscopic surgery for gastroduodenal perforation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>To list problems and to investigate the feasibility of our clinical protocol for treatment of gastroduodenal ulcer perforation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Case records of 62 patients and histology samples of 9 patients undergoing surgery for gastroduodenal perforation were retrospectively reviewed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Laparoscopic omental implantation is feasible for some cases of perforated peptic ulcer in patients who have either stenosis or massive perforations. In patients undergoing laparoscopic omental implantation, oral ingestion of water was started at 3.3 ± 0.5 post-operative days. <i>Helicobacter pylori</i> was positive in 27 of 35 patients (77%). Of 22 cases in whom intraoperative ascitic culture was taken, <i>Candida</i> was positive in nine (41%), and in six of eight cases involving wound infection or intraperitoneal abscess. Histological examination of resected stomach revealed the fungi with hypha formation at the base of the ulcer in 44% of patients.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Laparoscopic omental implantation was more feasible than in the past. The possibility of <i>Candida</i> infection and subsequent abscess formation must be considered in patients with gastroduodenal ulcer perforation.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50822,"journal":{"name":"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics Symposium Series","volume":"2 1","pages":"297-302"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1746-6342.2006.00060.x","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Twelve years’ progress in surgery for perforated gastric and duodenal ulcers: a retrospective study of indications for laparoscopic surgery, post-operative course and the influence of Candida infection\",\"authors\":\"T. NAKAMURA, M. YOSHIDA, Y. OTANI, K. KAMEYAMA, H. ISHIKAWA, K. KUMAI, T. KUBOTA, Y. SAIKAWA, M. KITAJIMA\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/j.1746-6342.2006.00060.x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Summary</h3>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Twelve years has passed since we introduced laparoscopic surgery for gastroduodenal perforation.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>To list problems and to investigate the feasibility of our clinical protocol for treatment of gastroduodenal ulcer perforation.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Case records of 62 patients and histology samples of 9 patients undergoing surgery for gastroduodenal perforation were retrospectively reviewed.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Laparoscopic omental implantation is feasible for some cases of perforated peptic ulcer in patients who have either stenosis or massive perforations. In patients undergoing laparoscopic omental implantation, oral ingestion of water was started at 3.3 ± 0.5 post-operative days. <i>Helicobacter pylori</i> was positive in 27 of 35 patients (77%). Of 22 cases in whom intraoperative ascitic culture was taken, <i>Candida</i> was positive in nine (41%), and in six of eight cases involving wound infection or intraperitoneal abscess. Histological examination of resected stomach revealed the fungi with hypha formation at the base of the ulcer in 44% of patients.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Laparoscopic omental implantation was more feasible than in the past. The possibility of <i>Candida</i> infection and subsequent abscess formation must be considered in patients with gastroduodenal ulcer perforation.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50822,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics Symposium Series\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"297-302\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1746-6342.2006.00060.x\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics Symposium Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1746-6342.2006.00060.x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics Symposium Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1746-6342.2006.00060.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Twelve years’ progress in surgery for perforated gastric and duodenal ulcers: a retrospective study of indications for laparoscopic surgery, post-operative course and the influence of Candida infection
Summary
Background
Twelve years has passed since we introduced laparoscopic surgery for gastroduodenal perforation.
Aim
To list problems and to investigate the feasibility of our clinical protocol for treatment of gastroduodenal ulcer perforation.
Methods
Case records of 62 patients and histology samples of 9 patients undergoing surgery for gastroduodenal perforation were retrospectively reviewed.
Results
Laparoscopic omental implantation is feasible for some cases of perforated peptic ulcer in patients who have either stenosis or massive perforations. In patients undergoing laparoscopic omental implantation, oral ingestion of water was started at 3.3 ± 0.5 post-operative days. Helicobacter pylori was positive in 27 of 35 patients (77%). Of 22 cases in whom intraoperative ascitic culture was taken, Candida was positive in nine (41%), and in six of eight cases involving wound infection or intraperitoneal abscess. Histological examination of resected stomach revealed the fungi with hypha formation at the base of the ulcer in 44% of patients.
Conclusions
Laparoscopic omental implantation was more feasible than in the past. The possibility of Candida infection and subsequent abscess formation must be considered in patients with gastroduodenal ulcer perforation.