荷兰式拍卖是否适用于竞争激烈的众包市场中的可分解任务?

S. Mridha, M. Bhattacharyya
{"title":"荷兰式拍卖是否适用于竞争激烈的众包市场中的可分解任务?","authors":"S. Mridha, M. Bhattacharyya","doi":"10.15346/HC.V4I1.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Competitive crowdsourcing is a popular strategic model for solving tasks in an efficient economical way. Competitive crowdsourcing platforms generally choose the winners for a single indivisible task following the conventional Dutch auction to minimize the cost. In this paper, we show that when the tasks are decomposable such mechanisms become biased for competitive crowdsourcing markets. As a solution to this, we suggest a variant of the Dutch auction (referred to as time-invariant Dutch auction) for solving decomposable tasks. Overall, some new insights about the mechanism design for competitive crowdsourcing markets are obtained.","PeriodicalId":92785,"journal":{"name":"Human computation (Fairfax, Va.)","volume":"3 1","pages":"71-77"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is Dutch Auction Suitable for Decomposable Tasks in Competitive Crowdsourcing Markets?\",\"authors\":\"S. Mridha, M. Bhattacharyya\",\"doi\":\"10.15346/HC.V4I1.4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Competitive crowdsourcing is a popular strategic model for solving tasks in an efficient economical way. Competitive crowdsourcing platforms generally choose the winners for a single indivisible task following the conventional Dutch auction to minimize the cost. In this paper, we show that when the tasks are decomposable such mechanisms become biased for competitive crowdsourcing markets. As a solution to this, we suggest a variant of the Dutch auction (referred to as time-invariant Dutch auction) for solving decomposable tasks. Overall, some new insights about the mechanism design for competitive crowdsourcing markets are obtained.\",\"PeriodicalId\":92785,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human computation (Fairfax, Va.)\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"71-77\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human computation (Fairfax, Va.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15346/HC.V4I1.4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human computation (Fairfax, Va.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15346/HC.V4I1.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

竞争性众包是一种流行的以高效经济的方式解决任务的战略模式。竞争激烈的众包平台通常会按照传统的荷兰式拍卖方式选择一个不可分割的任务的获胜者,以最大限度地降低成本。在本文中,我们表明,当任务可分解时,这种机制对竞争性众包市场有偏见。为了解决这个问题,我们建议采用荷兰式拍卖的一种变体(称为定常荷兰式拍卖)来解决可分解任务。总体而言,本文对竞争性众包市场的机制设计有了一些新的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is Dutch Auction Suitable for Decomposable Tasks in Competitive Crowdsourcing Markets?
Competitive crowdsourcing is a popular strategic model for solving tasks in an efficient economical way. Competitive crowdsourcing platforms generally choose the winners for a single indivisible task following the conventional Dutch auction to minimize the cost. In this paper, we show that when the tasks are decomposable such mechanisms become biased for competitive crowdsourcing markets. As a solution to this, we suggest a variant of the Dutch auction (referred to as time-invariant Dutch auction) for solving decomposable tasks. Overall, some new insights about the mechanism design for competitive crowdsourcing markets are obtained.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信