{"title":"参数化凸性测试","authors":"A. Lahiri, I. Newman, Nithin M. Varma","doi":"10.1137/1.9781611977066.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this work, we develop new insights into the fundamental problem of convexity testing of real-valued functions over the domain [n]. Specifically, we present a nonadaptive algorithm that, given inputs ε ∈ (0, 1), s ∈ N, and oracle access to a function, ε-tests convexity in O(log(s)/ε), where s is an upper bound on the number of distinct discrete derivatives of the function. We also show that this bound is tight. Since s ≤ n, our query complexity bound is at least as good as that of the optimal convexity tester (Ben Eliezer; ITCS 2019) with complexity O( log εn ε ); our bound is strictly better when s = o(n). The main contribution of our work is to appropriately parameterize the complexity of convexity testing to circumvent the worst-case lower bound (Belovs et al.; SODA 2020) of Ω( log(εn) ε ) expressed in terms of the input size and obtain a more efficient algorithm.","PeriodicalId":93491,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the SIAM Symposium on Simplicity in Algorithms (SOSA)","volume":"1 1","pages":"174-181"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Parameterized Convexity Testing\",\"authors\":\"A. Lahiri, I. Newman, Nithin M. Varma\",\"doi\":\"10.1137/1.9781611977066.12\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this work, we develop new insights into the fundamental problem of convexity testing of real-valued functions over the domain [n]. Specifically, we present a nonadaptive algorithm that, given inputs ε ∈ (0, 1), s ∈ N, and oracle access to a function, ε-tests convexity in O(log(s)/ε), where s is an upper bound on the number of distinct discrete derivatives of the function. We also show that this bound is tight. Since s ≤ n, our query complexity bound is at least as good as that of the optimal convexity tester (Ben Eliezer; ITCS 2019) with complexity O( log εn ε ); our bound is strictly better when s = o(n). The main contribution of our work is to appropriately parameterize the complexity of convexity testing to circumvent the worst-case lower bound (Belovs et al.; SODA 2020) of Ω( log(εn) ε ) expressed in terms of the input size and obtain a more efficient algorithm.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93491,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the SIAM Symposium on Simplicity in Algorithms (SOSA)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"174-181\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the SIAM Symposium on Simplicity in Algorithms (SOSA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611977066.12\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the SIAM Symposium on Simplicity in Algorithms (SOSA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611977066.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
In this work, we develop new insights into the fundamental problem of convexity testing of real-valued functions over the domain [n]. Specifically, we present a nonadaptive algorithm that, given inputs ε ∈ (0, 1), s ∈ N, and oracle access to a function, ε-tests convexity in O(log(s)/ε), where s is an upper bound on the number of distinct discrete derivatives of the function. We also show that this bound is tight. Since s ≤ n, our query complexity bound is at least as good as that of the optimal convexity tester (Ben Eliezer; ITCS 2019) with complexity O( log εn ε ); our bound is strictly better when s = o(n). The main contribution of our work is to appropriately parameterize the complexity of convexity testing to circumvent the worst-case lower bound (Belovs et al.; SODA 2020) of Ω( log(εn) ε ) expressed in terms of the input size and obtain a more efficient algorithm.