设计医疗保险在家帮助福利:马里兰州社区第一选择计划的经验教训。

LDI issue brief Pub Date : 2018-06-01 DOI:10.13016/M2X921N95
K. Davis, Amber Willink, I. Stockwell, Kaitlyn Whiton, Julia G. Burgdorf, C. Woodcock
{"title":"设计医疗保险在家帮助福利:马里兰州社区第一选择计划的经验教训。","authors":"K. Davis, Amber Willink, I. Stockwell, Kaitlyn Whiton, Julia G. Burgdorf, C. Woodcock","doi":"10.13016/M2X921N95","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ISSUE: Medicare does not cover homeand community-based services (HCBS) that help beneficiaries function independently at home. The financial burden of uncovered personal care services puts beneficiaries with physical or cognitive impairment at risk of nursing home placement. GOAL: Analyze trends in paid and unpaid personal care and expenditures under a model Medicaid Community First Choice (CFC) program in Maryland. METHODS: Trends were analyzed using Maryland Medicaid claims data and standardized assessment information. Quantitative analysis was supplemented by interviews with Maryland officials and experts. FINDINGS: Maryland introduced CFC in 2014. By the end of 2016, enrollment had reached 11,573. The majority of participants were over age 65 (55%) and dually eligible for both Medicare and Medicaid (65%). Expenditures per person per year were stable at $21,000 between 2014 and 2016. Mean hours of paid personal assistance per participant averaged 29 hours per week, with slightly higher levels of utilization for dually eligible enrollees than for Medicaid-only enrollees. Weekly mean hours of informal support declined slightly. Unpaid informal care continued at a high rate, even though payment is permitted for personal care from family members and other previously unpaid caregivers. CONCLUSION: Maryland’s experience points to: a targeted benefit that will augment support from family members and other unpaid caregivers, a stable per-person cost, and increased take-up rates of eligible enrollees over time. KEY TAKEAWAYS Medicare does not cover homeand community-based services to help people function independently at home, which can put beneficiaries with physical or cognitive impairment at risk of being placed in nursing homes. Maryland implemented the Community First Choice benefit, authorized by the Affordable Care Act, to cover homeand community-based long-term services under Medicaid. The benefit has supplemented — rather than substituted for — informal support from family and other caregivers and has resulted in stable per-person spending since it was launched in 2014. ISSUE BRIEF JUNE 2018 Designing a Medicare Help at Home Benefit: Lessons from Maryland’s Community First Choice Program Karen Davis, Amber Willink, Ian Stockwell, Kaitlyn Whiton, Julia Burgdorf, and Cynthia Woodcock","PeriodicalId":85087,"journal":{"name":"LDI issue brief","volume":"79 1","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Designing a Medicare Help at Home Benefit: Lessons from Maryland’s Community First Choice Program.\",\"authors\":\"K. Davis, Amber Willink, I. Stockwell, Kaitlyn Whiton, Julia G. Burgdorf, C. Woodcock\",\"doi\":\"10.13016/M2X921N95\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ISSUE: Medicare does not cover homeand community-based services (HCBS) that help beneficiaries function independently at home. The financial burden of uncovered personal care services puts beneficiaries with physical or cognitive impairment at risk of nursing home placement. GOAL: Analyze trends in paid and unpaid personal care and expenditures under a model Medicaid Community First Choice (CFC) program in Maryland. METHODS: Trends were analyzed using Maryland Medicaid claims data and standardized assessment information. Quantitative analysis was supplemented by interviews with Maryland officials and experts. FINDINGS: Maryland introduced CFC in 2014. By the end of 2016, enrollment had reached 11,573. The majority of participants were over age 65 (55%) and dually eligible for both Medicare and Medicaid (65%). Expenditures per person per year were stable at $21,000 between 2014 and 2016. Mean hours of paid personal assistance per participant averaged 29 hours per week, with slightly higher levels of utilization for dually eligible enrollees than for Medicaid-only enrollees. Weekly mean hours of informal support declined slightly. Unpaid informal care continued at a high rate, even though payment is permitted for personal care from family members and other previously unpaid caregivers. CONCLUSION: Maryland’s experience points to: a targeted benefit that will augment support from family members and other unpaid caregivers, a stable per-person cost, and increased take-up rates of eligible enrollees over time. KEY TAKEAWAYS Medicare does not cover homeand community-based services to help people function independently at home, which can put beneficiaries with physical or cognitive impairment at risk of being placed in nursing homes. Maryland implemented the Community First Choice benefit, authorized by the Affordable Care Act, to cover homeand community-based long-term services under Medicaid. The benefit has supplemented — rather than substituted for — informal support from family and other caregivers and has resulted in stable per-person spending since it was launched in 2014. ISSUE BRIEF JUNE 2018 Designing a Medicare Help at Home Benefit: Lessons from Maryland’s Community First Choice Program Karen Davis, Amber Willink, Ian Stockwell, Kaitlyn Whiton, Julia Burgdorf, and Cynthia Woodcock\",\"PeriodicalId\":85087,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LDI issue brief\",\"volume\":\"79 1\",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LDI issue brief\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13016/M2X921N95\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LDI issue brief","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13016/M2X921N95","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

问题:医疗保险不包括帮助受益人在家中独立运作的家庭和社区服务(HCBS)。未覆盖的个人护理服务的经济负担使身体或认知障碍的受益人面临养老院安置的风险。目标:分析马里兰州医疗补助社区第一选择(CFC)模式下的有偿和无偿个人护理和支出趋势。方法:使用马里兰州医疗补助索赔数据和标准化评估信息分析趋势。与马里兰州官员和专家的访谈补充了定量分析。研究结果:马里兰州于2014年引入CFC。截至2016年底,招生人数达到11573人。大多数参与者年龄在65岁以上(55%),同时有资格享受医疗保险和医疗补助(65%)。2014年至2016年期间,人均年支出稳定在2.1万美元。每位参保者平均每周获得29小时的有偿个人援助,双重资格参保者的利用水平略高于只参加医疗补助的参保者。每周非正式支持的平均时间略有下降。尽管允许支付家庭成员和其他以前没有报酬的照料者的个人照料费用,但无偿非正式照料的比率仍然很高。结论:马里兰州的经验表明:有针对性的福利将增加家庭成员和其他无偿照顾者的支持,稳定的人均成本,并随着时间的推移提高合格参保人的接受率。医疗保险不包括帮助人们在家中独立生活的家庭和社区服务,这可能会使身体或认知障碍的受益人面临被安置在养老院的风险。马里兰州实施了由《平价医疗法案》授权的“社区优先选择”福利,以覆盖医疗补助计划下的家庭和社区长期服务。自2014年启动以来,这项福利补充而不是取代了来自家庭和其他照顾者的非正式支持,并带来了稳定的人均支出。问题简报2018年6月设计医疗保险在家帮助福利:马里兰州社区第一选择计划的教训凯伦戴维斯,琥珀威林克,伊恩斯托克韦尔,凯特琳惠顿,朱莉娅伯格多夫和辛西娅伍德科克
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Designing a Medicare Help at Home Benefit: Lessons from Maryland’s Community First Choice Program.
ISSUE: Medicare does not cover homeand community-based services (HCBS) that help beneficiaries function independently at home. The financial burden of uncovered personal care services puts beneficiaries with physical or cognitive impairment at risk of nursing home placement. GOAL: Analyze trends in paid and unpaid personal care and expenditures under a model Medicaid Community First Choice (CFC) program in Maryland. METHODS: Trends were analyzed using Maryland Medicaid claims data and standardized assessment information. Quantitative analysis was supplemented by interviews with Maryland officials and experts. FINDINGS: Maryland introduced CFC in 2014. By the end of 2016, enrollment had reached 11,573. The majority of participants were over age 65 (55%) and dually eligible for both Medicare and Medicaid (65%). Expenditures per person per year were stable at $21,000 between 2014 and 2016. Mean hours of paid personal assistance per participant averaged 29 hours per week, with slightly higher levels of utilization for dually eligible enrollees than for Medicaid-only enrollees. Weekly mean hours of informal support declined slightly. Unpaid informal care continued at a high rate, even though payment is permitted for personal care from family members and other previously unpaid caregivers. CONCLUSION: Maryland’s experience points to: a targeted benefit that will augment support from family members and other unpaid caregivers, a stable per-person cost, and increased take-up rates of eligible enrollees over time. KEY TAKEAWAYS Medicare does not cover homeand community-based services to help people function independently at home, which can put beneficiaries with physical or cognitive impairment at risk of being placed in nursing homes. Maryland implemented the Community First Choice benefit, authorized by the Affordable Care Act, to cover homeand community-based long-term services under Medicaid. The benefit has supplemented — rather than substituted for — informal support from family and other caregivers and has resulted in stable per-person spending since it was launched in 2014. ISSUE BRIEF JUNE 2018 Designing a Medicare Help at Home Benefit: Lessons from Maryland’s Community First Choice Program Karen Davis, Amber Willink, Ian Stockwell, Kaitlyn Whiton, Julia Burgdorf, and Cynthia Woodcock
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信