使用连续血流左心室辅助装置患者的胺碘酮使用和全因死亡率

R. Gopinathannair, N. Pothineni, J. Trivedi, H. Roukoz, J. Cowger, Mustafa M. Ahmed, A. Bhan, Ashwin K Ravichandran, G. Bhat, Amin Al Ahmad, A. Natale, L. Di Biase, M. Slaughter, D. Lakkireddy
{"title":"使用连续血流左心室辅助装置患者的胺碘酮使用和全因死亡率","authors":"R. Gopinathannair, N. Pothineni, J. Trivedi, H. Roukoz, J. Cowger, Mustafa M. Ahmed, A. Bhan, Ashwin K Ravichandran, G. Bhat, Amin Al Ahmad, A. Natale, L. Di Biase, M. Slaughter, D. Lakkireddy","doi":"10.1161/JAHA.121.023762","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Atrial and ventricular arrhythmias are commonly encountered in patients with advanced heart failure, with amiodarone being the most commonly used antiarrhythmic drug in continuous‐flow left ventricular assist device (CF‐LVAD) recipients. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of amiodarone use on long‐term all‐cause mortality in ptients with a CF‐LVAD. Methods and Results A retrospective multicenter study of CF‐LVAD was conducted at 5 centers including all CF‐LVAD implants from 2007 to 2015. Patients were stratified based on pre–CF‐LVAD implant amiodarone use. Additional use of amiodarone after CF‐LVAD implantation was also evaluated. Primary outcome was all‐cause mortality during long‐term follow‐up. Kaplan‐Meier curves were used to assess survival outcomes. Multivariable Cox regression was used to identify predictors of outcomes. Propensity matching was done to address baseline differences. A total of 480 patients with a CF‐LVAD (aged 58±13 years, 81% men) were included. Of these, 170 (35.4%) were on chronic amiodarone therapy at the time of CF‐LVAD implant, and 310 (64.6%) were not on amiodarone. Rate of all‐cause mortality over the follow‐up period was 32.9% in the amiodarone group compared with 29.6% in those not on amiodarone (P=0.008). Similar results were noted in the propensity‐matched group (log‐rank, P=0.04). On multivariable Cox regression analysis, amiodarone use at baseline was independently associated with all‐cause mortality (hazard ratio, 1.68 [95% CI, 1.1–2.5]; P=0.01). Conclusions Amiodarone use was associated with significantly increased rates of all‐cause mortality in CF‐LVAD recipients. Earlier interventions for arrhythmias to avoid long‐term amiodarone exposure may improve long‐term outcomes in CF‐LVAD recipients and needs further study.","PeriodicalId":17189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Amiodarone Use and All‐Cause Mortality in Patients With a Continuous‐Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device\",\"authors\":\"R. Gopinathannair, N. Pothineni, J. Trivedi, H. Roukoz, J. Cowger, Mustafa M. Ahmed, A. Bhan, Ashwin K Ravichandran, G. Bhat, Amin Al Ahmad, A. Natale, L. Di Biase, M. Slaughter, D. Lakkireddy\",\"doi\":\"10.1161/JAHA.121.023762\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Atrial and ventricular arrhythmias are commonly encountered in patients with advanced heart failure, with amiodarone being the most commonly used antiarrhythmic drug in continuous‐flow left ventricular assist device (CF‐LVAD) recipients. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of amiodarone use on long‐term all‐cause mortality in ptients with a CF‐LVAD. Methods and Results A retrospective multicenter study of CF‐LVAD was conducted at 5 centers including all CF‐LVAD implants from 2007 to 2015. Patients were stratified based on pre–CF‐LVAD implant amiodarone use. Additional use of amiodarone after CF‐LVAD implantation was also evaluated. Primary outcome was all‐cause mortality during long‐term follow‐up. Kaplan‐Meier curves were used to assess survival outcomes. Multivariable Cox regression was used to identify predictors of outcomes. Propensity matching was done to address baseline differences. A total of 480 patients with a CF‐LVAD (aged 58±13 years, 81% men) were included. Of these, 170 (35.4%) were on chronic amiodarone therapy at the time of CF‐LVAD implant, and 310 (64.6%) were not on amiodarone. Rate of all‐cause mortality over the follow‐up period was 32.9% in the amiodarone group compared with 29.6% in those not on amiodarone (P=0.008). Similar results were noted in the propensity‐matched group (log‐rank, P=0.04). On multivariable Cox regression analysis, amiodarone use at baseline was independently associated with all‐cause mortality (hazard ratio, 1.68 [95% CI, 1.1–2.5]; P=0.01). Conclusions Amiodarone use was associated with significantly increased rates of all‐cause mortality in CF‐LVAD recipients. Earlier interventions for arrhythmias to avoid long‐term amiodarone exposure may improve long‐term outcomes in CF‐LVAD recipients and needs further study.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.023762\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.023762","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

背景房性和室性心律失常在晚期心力衰竭患者中很常见,胺碘酮是连续血流左心室辅助装置(CF‐LVAD)接受者中最常用的抗心律失常药物。本研究的目的是评估胺碘酮对CF - LVAD患者长期全因死亡率的影响。方法与结果2007年至2015年在5个中心对CF‐LVAD植入物进行回顾性多中心研究。患者根据预cf‐LVAD植入物使用胺碘酮进行分层。还评估了CF - LVAD植入后胺碘酮的额外使用。主要结局是长期随访期间的全因死亡率。Kaplan - Meier曲线用于评估生存结果。采用多变量Cox回归来确定预测结果的因素。进行倾向匹配以解决基线差异。共纳入480例CF - LVAD患者(年龄58±13岁,81%为男性)。其中,170例(35.4%)在植入CF‐LVAD时接受了慢性胺碘酮治疗,310例(64.6%)未接受胺碘酮治疗。在随访期间,胺碘酮组的全因死亡率为32.9%,而未使用胺碘酮组为29.6% (P=0.008)。倾向匹配组也有类似的结果(log‐rank, P=0.04)。在多变量Cox回归分析中,基线时胺碘酮的使用与全因死亡率独立相关(风险比,1.68 [95% CI, 1.1-2.5];P = 0.01)。结论:胺碘酮的使用与CF - LVAD受者的全因死亡率显著升高相关。早期干预心律失常以避免长期胺碘酮暴露可能改善CF - LVAD受者的长期预后,但需要进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Amiodarone Use and All‐Cause Mortality in Patients With a Continuous‐Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device
Background Atrial and ventricular arrhythmias are commonly encountered in patients with advanced heart failure, with amiodarone being the most commonly used antiarrhythmic drug in continuous‐flow left ventricular assist device (CF‐LVAD) recipients. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of amiodarone use on long‐term all‐cause mortality in ptients with a CF‐LVAD. Methods and Results A retrospective multicenter study of CF‐LVAD was conducted at 5 centers including all CF‐LVAD implants from 2007 to 2015. Patients were stratified based on pre–CF‐LVAD implant amiodarone use. Additional use of amiodarone after CF‐LVAD implantation was also evaluated. Primary outcome was all‐cause mortality during long‐term follow‐up. Kaplan‐Meier curves were used to assess survival outcomes. Multivariable Cox regression was used to identify predictors of outcomes. Propensity matching was done to address baseline differences. A total of 480 patients with a CF‐LVAD (aged 58±13 years, 81% men) were included. Of these, 170 (35.4%) were on chronic amiodarone therapy at the time of CF‐LVAD implant, and 310 (64.6%) were not on amiodarone. Rate of all‐cause mortality over the follow‐up period was 32.9% in the amiodarone group compared with 29.6% in those not on amiodarone (P=0.008). Similar results were noted in the propensity‐matched group (log‐rank, P=0.04). On multivariable Cox regression analysis, amiodarone use at baseline was independently associated with all‐cause mortality (hazard ratio, 1.68 [95% CI, 1.1–2.5]; P=0.01). Conclusions Amiodarone use was associated with significantly increased rates of all‐cause mortality in CF‐LVAD recipients. Earlier interventions for arrhythmias to avoid long‐term amiodarone exposure may improve long‐term outcomes in CF‐LVAD recipients and needs further study.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信