心房颤动与颈动脉狭窄的半球及视网膜缺血发生率比较

D. Anderson, L. Kappelle, M. Eliasziw, V. Babikian, L. Pearce, H. Barnett
{"title":"心房颤动与颈动脉狭窄的半球及视网膜缺血发生率比较","authors":"D. Anderson, L. Kappelle, M. Eliasziw, V. Babikian, L. Pearce, H. Barnett","doi":"10.1161/01.STR.0000023445.20454.A8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Purpose— The goal of this study was to examine the hypotheses that retinal ischemia is caused more often by carotid atherosclerosis than by atrial fibrillation and that the odds of retinal events compared with hemispheric events increase with worsening carotid stenosis. Methods— We used data from the Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation (SPAF) I through III trials and North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET), calculating hemispheric:retinal (H:R) odds for the territory of ischemic events during follow-up in patients with atrial fibrillation and medically treated 50% to 99% carotid stenosis or occlusion in the respective trials. Results— The H:R odds were 25:1 in the SPAF aspirin-assigned patients and 2:1 for NASCET vessels. In NASCET patients, the H:R odds of recurrent ischemic events were 1:4 for vessels randomized initially for retinal symptoms compared with 6:1 for those randomized for hemispheric events (significant difference;P <0.001). Moreover, the H:R odds of first events in the territory of the contralateral asymptomatic artery were 1:1 if the randomized vessel had retinal symptoms compared with 4:1 if the randomized vessel had hemispheric symptoms (significant difference;P <0.01). Increasing carotid stenosis in the 50% to 99% range had no effect on H:R odds (P =0.8). Conclusions— These findings confirm that retinal symptoms are more typical of carotid stenosis. Hemodynamic effects do not appear to be more important in the pathogenesis of retinal events than hemispheric ones in carotid stenosis. The retinal versus hemispheric location of initial symptoms is strongly predictive of the location of subsequent events in patients with carotid stenosis, even when new symptoms are contralateral to the original ones.","PeriodicalId":22274,"journal":{"name":"Stroke: Journal of the American Heart Association","volume":"21 1","pages":"1963-1968"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"105","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Occurrence of Hemispheric and Retinal Ischemia in Atrial Fibrillation Compared With Carotid Stenosis\",\"authors\":\"D. Anderson, L. Kappelle, M. Eliasziw, V. Babikian, L. Pearce, H. Barnett\",\"doi\":\"10.1161/01.STR.0000023445.20454.A8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background and Purpose— The goal of this study was to examine the hypotheses that retinal ischemia is caused more often by carotid atherosclerosis than by atrial fibrillation and that the odds of retinal events compared with hemispheric events increase with worsening carotid stenosis. Methods— We used data from the Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation (SPAF) I through III trials and North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET), calculating hemispheric:retinal (H:R) odds for the territory of ischemic events during follow-up in patients with atrial fibrillation and medically treated 50% to 99% carotid stenosis or occlusion in the respective trials. Results— The H:R odds were 25:1 in the SPAF aspirin-assigned patients and 2:1 for NASCET vessels. In NASCET patients, the H:R odds of recurrent ischemic events were 1:4 for vessels randomized initially for retinal symptoms compared with 6:1 for those randomized for hemispheric events (significant difference;P <0.001). Moreover, the H:R odds of first events in the territory of the contralateral asymptomatic artery were 1:1 if the randomized vessel had retinal symptoms compared with 4:1 if the randomized vessel had hemispheric symptoms (significant difference;P <0.01). Increasing carotid stenosis in the 50% to 99% range had no effect on H:R odds (P =0.8). Conclusions— These findings confirm that retinal symptoms are more typical of carotid stenosis. Hemodynamic effects do not appear to be more important in the pathogenesis of retinal events than hemispheric ones in carotid stenosis. The retinal versus hemispheric location of initial symptoms is strongly predictive of the location of subsequent events in patients with carotid stenosis, even when new symptoms are contralateral to the original ones.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22274,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Stroke: Journal of the American Heart Association\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"1963-1968\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"105\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Stroke: Journal of the American Heart Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000023445.20454.A8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stroke: Journal of the American Heart Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000023445.20454.A8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 105

摘要

背景和目的:本研究的目的是检验以下假设:视网膜缺血更多是由颈动脉粥样硬化引起的,而不是心房颤动引起的;视网膜事件与半球事件相比,视网膜事件的几率随着颈动脉狭窄的恶化而增加。方法:我们使用来自房颤卒中预防(SPAF) I至III试验和北美症状性颈动脉内膜切除术试验(NASCET)的数据,计算在房颤患者随访期间缺血性事件领域的半球:视网膜(H:R)几率,并在各自的试验中治疗了50%至99%的颈动脉狭窄或闭塞。结果:SPAF患者的H:R比值为25:1,NASCET患者的H:R比值为2:1。在NASCET患者中,最初因视网膜症状随机分配的血管复发缺血性事件的H:R比值为1:4,而因半球事件随机分配的血管复发缺血性事件的H:R比值为6:1(显著差异;P <0.001)。此外,随机血管有视网膜症状时,对侧无症状动脉领域首次事件的H:R比值为1:1,而随机血管有半球症状时,H:R比值为4:1(差异有统计学意义,P <0.01)。颈动脉狭窄在50% ~ 99%范围内增加对H:R比值无影响(P =0.8)。结论:这些发现证实视网膜症状在颈动脉狭窄中更为典型。在视网膜事件的发病机制中,血流动力学效应似乎并不比颈动脉狭窄的半球效应更重要。在颈动脉狭窄患者中,视网膜与半球的初始症状位置对后续事件的位置有很强的预测作用,即使新症状出现在对侧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Occurrence of Hemispheric and Retinal Ischemia in Atrial Fibrillation Compared With Carotid Stenosis
Background and Purpose— The goal of this study was to examine the hypotheses that retinal ischemia is caused more often by carotid atherosclerosis than by atrial fibrillation and that the odds of retinal events compared with hemispheric events increase with worsening carotid stenosis. Methods— We used data from the Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation (SPAF) I through III trials and North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET), calculating hemispheric:retinal (H:R) odds for the territory of ischemic events during follow-up in patients with atrial fibrillation and medically treated 50% to 99% carotid stenosis or occlusion in the respective trials. Results— The H:R odds were 25:1 in the SPAF aspirin-assigned patients and 2:1 for NASCET vessels. In NASCET patients, the H:R odds of recurrent ischemic events were 1:4 for vessels randomized initially for retinal symptoms compared with 6:1 for those randomized for hemispheric events (significant difference;P <0.001). Moreover, the H:R odds of first events in the territory of the contralateral asymptomatic artery were 1:1 if the randomized vessel had retinal symptoms compared with 4:1 if the randomized vessel had hemispheric symptoms (significant difference;P <0.01). Increasing carotid stenosis in the 50% to 99% range had no effect on H:R odds (P =0.8). Conclusions— These findings confirm that retinal symptoms are more typical of carotid stenosis. Hemodynamic effects do not appear to be more important in the pathogenesis of retinal events than hemispheric ones in carotid stenosis. The retinal versus hemispheric location of initial symptoms is strongly predictive of the location of subsequent events in patients with carotid stenosis, even when new symptoms are contralateral to the original ones.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信