煤层气套管井测井效益实例研究

S. Mastin, Matt Pfahl, R. Jukes
{"title":"煤层气套管井测井效益实例研究","authors":"S. Mastin, Matt Pfahl, R. Jukes","doi":"10.2118/191932-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper presents a case study review of the performance benefits of a 66 well Coal Bed Methane (CBM) development program whereby cased-hole (CH) logging was introduced as a substitute for open-hole (OH) logging. This paper demonstrates how the reduction in OH logging requirements improved time and cost performance and reduced risk exposure while maintaining suitable data quality.\n The approach was based on utilizing existing offset well data and three-dimensional (3D) seismic data to substitute OH density logging for CH density logging. Therefore reducing critical path time on the drilling rig and risk exposure with wireline logging tools in an OH environment. A qualitative and quantitative approach to review rig performance and cost benefits was subsequently undertaken.\n The density log was of key importance as it is used to define net coal thickness in CBM reservoirs. Current CH density logging typically results in the reduction of log resolution and accuracy which limits the ability to resolve thinner coal seams. The loss of coal definition has the potential to result in the under-estimation of net coal for reserves purposes, impact static modelling and possibly negatively impact fracture stimulation decisions.\n The 66 well development program provided a suitable data set to quantify the performance benefits of a combined CH and OH evaluation program. The transition to CH density logs removes online evaluation activities during the drilling operation. This provides a direct time and associated spread cost saving. In addition, unsuccessful OH logs were replaced with CH density logs when hole conditions presented higher likelihood of unproductive and high risk operations (tight hole/fishing). The campaigning of CH logging operations further optimized both wireline and operating company resources and time. The CH density logs provided suitable data to adequately identify coal targets in order to stimulate and complete the wellbore. The reduction in log resolution and coal identification was overcome by developing 'optimized' density cut-offs based on a calibration study with OH density wireline data.\n This case study supports the use of CH density logs in lieu of OH density logs where feasible for CBM reservoirs. It demonstrates the operational optimizations and cost savings by conducting wireline logging operations offline while also reducing risk exposure to down hole issues.","PeriodicalId":11182,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Thu, October 25, 2018","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Case Study for Performance Benefits of Cased-Hole Logging in Coal Bed Methane CBM\",\"authors\":\"S. Mastin, Matt Pfahl, R. Jukes\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/191932-MS\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This paper presents a case study review of the performance benefits of a 66 well Coal Bed Methane (CBM) development program whereby cased-hole (CH) logging was introduced as a substitute for open-hole (OH) logging. This paper demonstrates how the reduction in OH logging requirements improved time and cost performance and reduced risk exposure while maintaining suitable data quality.\\n The approach was based on utilizing existing offset well data and three-dimensional (3D) seismic data to substitute OH density logging for CH density logging. Therefore reducing critical path time on the drilling rig and risk exposure with wireline logging tools in an OH environment. A qualitative and quantitative approach to review rig performance and cost benefits was subsequently undertaken.\\n The density log was of key importance as it is used to define net coal thickness in CBM reservoirs. Current CH density logging typically results in the reduction of log resolution and accuracy which limits the ability to resolve thinner coal seams. The loss of coal definition has the potential to result in the under-estimation of net coal for reserves purposes, impact static modelling and possibly negatively impact fracture stimulation decisions.\\n The 66 well development program provided a suitable data set to quantify the performance benefits of a combined CH and OH evaluation program. The transition to CH density logs removes online evaluation activities during the drilling operation. This provides a direct time and associated spread cost saving. In addition, unsuccessful OH logs were replaced with CH density logs when hole conditions presented higher likelihood of unproductive and high risk operations (tight hole/fishing). The campaigning of CH logging operations further optimized both wireline and operating company resources and time. The CH density logs provided suitable data to adequately identify coal targets in order to stimulate and complete the wellbore. The reduction in log resolution and coal identification was overcome by developing 'optimized' density cut-offs based on a calibration study with OH density wireline data.\\n This case study supports the use of CH density logs in lieu of OH density logs where feasible for CBM reservoirs. It demonstrates the operational optimizations and cost savings by conducting wireline logging operations offline while also reducing risk exposure to down hole issues.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11182,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 3 Thu, October 25, 2018\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 3 Thu, October 25, 2018\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/191932-MS\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Thu, October 25, 2018","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/191932-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文介绍了一个66口煤层气(CBM)开发项目的案例研究综述,该项目采用套管井(CH)测井代替裸眼(OH)测井。本文演示了OH日志记录需求的减少如何改善了时间和成本性能,并降低了风险暴露,同时保持了适当的数据质量。该方法基于现有邻井数据和三维(3D)地震数据,以OH密度测井代替CH密度测井。因此,减少了钻井平台上的关键路径时间,减少了在OH环境下使用电缆测井工具的风险。随后采取了定性和定量方法来评估钻机性能和成本效益。密度测井是确定煤层气储层净煤厚的关键。目前的CH密度测井通常会导致测井分辨率和精度的降低,从而限制了对薄煤层的解析能力。煤炭定义的缺失有可能导致净煤储量的低估,影响静态建模,并可能对压裂增产决策产生负面影响。66口井的开发方案提供了合适的数据集,可以量化碳氢和氢氧联合评估方案的性能效益。向CH密度测井的过渡消除了钻井作业期间的在线评估活动。这直接节省了时间和相关的价差成本。此外,当井眼条件出现非生产性和高风险作业(紧井/打捞)的可能性较大时,将不成功的OH测井替换为CH密度测井。CH测井作业的开展进一步优化了电缆和作业公司的资源和时间。甲烷密度测井提供了合适的数据,可以充分识别煤靶,从而进行增产和完井。通过对OH密度电缆数据的校准研究,开发了“优化”的密度截止值,克服了测井分辨率和煤炭识别的降低。该案例研究支持在煤层气储层可行的情况下使用甲烷密度测井代替氢氧密度测井。通过离线进行电缆测井作业,可以实现作业优化和成本节约,同时降低了井下问题的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Case Study for Performance Benefits of Cased-Hole Logging in Coal Bed Methane CBM
This paper presents a case study review of the performance benefits of a 66 well Coal Bed Methane (CBM) development program whereby cased-hole (CH) logging was introduced as a substitute for open-hole (OH) logging. This paper demonstrates how the reduction in OH logging requirements improved time and cost performance and reduced risk exposure while maintaining suitable data quality. The approach was based on utilizing existing offset well data and three-dimensional (3D) seismic data to substitute OH density logging for CH density logging. Therefore reducing critical path time on the drilling rig and risk exposure with wireline logging tools in an OH environment. A qualitative and quantitative approach to review rig performance and cost benefits was subsequently undertaken. The density log was of key importance as it is used to define net coal thickness in CBM reservoirs. Current CH density logging typically results in the reduction of log resolution and accuracy which limits the ability to resolve thinner coal seams. The loss of coal definition has the potential to result in the under-estimation of net coal for reserves purposes, impact static modelling and possibly negatively impact fracture stimulation decisions. The 66 well development program provided a suitable data set to quantify the performance benefits of a combined CH and OH evaluation program. The transition to CH density logs removes online evaluation activities during the drilling operation. This provides a direct time and associated spread cost saving. In addition, unsuccessful OH logs were replaced with CH density logs when hole conditions presented higher likelihood of unproductive and high risk operations (tight hole/fishing). The campaigning of CH logging operations further optimized both wireline and operating company resources and time. The CH density logs provided suitable data to adequately identify coal targets in order to stimulate and complete the wellbore. The reduction in log resolution and coal identification was overcome by developing 'optimized' density cut-offs based on a calibration study with OH density wireline data. This case study supports the use of CH density logs in lieu of OH density logs where feasible for CBM reservoirs. It demonstrates the operational optimizations and cost savings by conducting wireline logging operations offline while also reducing risk exposure to down hole issues.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信