《关于斯塔提乌斯的三个笔记》，底比德5 (11-16);20;29-32)

IF 0.4 3区历史学 0 CLASSICS

MNEMOSYNE Pub Date : 2022-12-23 DOI:10.1163/1568525x-bja10150

Baruch Martínez Zepeda

{"title":"《关于斯塔提乌斯的三个笔记》，底比德5 (11-16);20;29-32)","authors":"Baruch Martínez Zepeda","doi":"10.1163/1568525x-bja10150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThis article aims to examine three textual problems in Statius’ Thebaid, book 5 (Hypsipyle’s narration of the massacre in Lemnos). These textual issues have been previously approached by different scholars without taking into account each other’s work. This paper conveys an overview and shows that some of these problems had already been clarified by ancient exegesis.","PeriodicalId":46134,"journal":{"name":"MNEMOSYNE","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Three Notes on Statius, Thebaid 5 (11-16; 20-23; 29-32)\",\"authors\":\"Baruch Martínez Zepeda\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/1568525x-bja10150\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nThis article aims to examine three textual problems in Statius’ Thebaid, book 5 (Hypsipyle’s narration of the massacre in Lemnos). These textual issues have been previously approached by different scholars without taking into account each other’s work. This paper conveys an overview and shows that some of these problems had already been clarified by ancient exegesis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46134,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MNEMOSYNE\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MNEMOSYNE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/1568525x-bja10150\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"CLASSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MNEMOSYNE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/1568525x-bja10150","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在考察斯塔提乌斯的《底比斯记》第5卷(希西派勒对利姆诺斯岛大屠杀的叙述)中的三个文本问题。这些文本问题之前已经由不同的学者在没有考虑到彼此的工作的情况下进行了探讨。本文对这些问题进行了概述，并指出其中一些问题在古代的释经学中已经得到了澄清。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Three Notes on Statius, Thebaid 5 (11-16; 20-23; 29-32)

This article aims to examine three textual problems in Statius’ Thebaid, book 5 (Hypsipyle’s narration of the massacre in Lemnos). These textual issues have been previously approached by different scholars without taking into account each other’s work. This paper conveys an overview and shows that some of these problems had already been clarified by ancient exegesis.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

MNEMOSYNE CLASSICS-

CiteScore

0.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Since its first appearance as a journal of textual criticism in 1852, Mnemosyne has secured a position as one of the leading journals in its field worldwide. Its reputation is built on the Dutch academic tradition, famous for its rigour and thoroughness. It attracts contributions from all over the world, with the result that Mnemosyne is distinctive for a combination of scholarly approaches from both sides of the Atlantic and the Equator. Its presence in libraries around the globe is a sign of its continued reputation as an invaluable resource for scholarship in Classical studies.