外加筋聚合物全尺寸钢筋混凝土板:现场试验与数值比较

R. Castedo, Anastasio P. Santos, C. Reifarth, M. Chiquito, Lina María López, A. Pérez-Caldentey, S. Martínez-Almajano, A. Alañón
{"title":"外加筋聚合物全尺寸钢筋混凝土板:现场试验与数值比较","authors":"R. Castedo, Anastasio P. Santos, C. Reifarth, M. Chiquito, Lina María López, A. Pérez-Caldentey, S. Martínez-Almajano, A. Alañón","doi":"10.2495/hpsu220121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Numerical simulation of reinforced concrete (RC) slabs with the addition of an external reinforced polymer (FRP) have been developed and compared with full scale real tests. The size of the slabs was 4.4 x 1.46 m, with a span of 4 m, and a thickness of 15 cm. The slabs were built using concrete of class C25/30, and B500C reinforcing steel. Seven tests were conducted, one at a scaled distance of 0.83 m/kg 1/3 , three at a scaled distance of 0.42 m/kg 1/3 , and three at 0.21 m/kg 1/3 . For the biggest scaled distance, the slab had no extra reinforcement. In the other two cases one of the slabs had no extra reinforcement, while the other two tests were performed with carbon fibre reinforcement (CFRP) and E-glass fibre reinforcement (GFRP) located on the face opposite to the blast. Numerical simulation was performed with LS-DYNA software. The study elements (concrete, steel and reinforcement) have been simulated in a Lagrangian formulation with solid elements, beam elements and shells, respectively. Three concrete models have been used and compared: CSCM, MAT72-R3 and RHT. As for the explosive, the CONWEP-based Load Blast Enhanced (LBE) card was used. Reinforcement with CFRP resulted in a generally reduced damage area on both surfaces. All models show a good correlation with the test results and a non-destructive damage estimation technique when comparing them in terms of damage area.","PeriodicalId":23773,"journal":{"name":"WIT Transactions on the Built Environment","volume":"98 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"FULL-SCALE REINFORCED CONCRETE SLABS WITH EXTERNAL REINFORCED POLYMER: FIELD TEST AND NUMERICAL COMPARISON\",\"authors\":\"R. Castedo, Anastasio P. Santos, C. Reifarth, M. Chiquito, Lina María López, A. Pérez-Caldentey, S. Martínez-Almajano, A. Alañón\",\"doi\":\"10.2495/hpsu220121\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Numerical simulation of reinforced concrete (RC) slabs with the addition of an external reinforced polymer (FRP) have been developed and compared with full scale real tests. The size of the slabs was 4.4 x 1.46 m, with a span of 4 m, and a thickness of 15 cm. The slabs were built using concrete of class C25/30, and B500C reinforcing steel. Seven tests were conducted, one at a scaled distance of 0.83 m/kg 1/3 , three at a scaled distance of 0.42 m/kg 1/3 , and three at 0.21 m/kg 1/3 . For the biggest scaled distance, the slab had no extra reinforcement. In the other two cases one of the slabs had no extra reinforcement, while the other two tests were performed with carbon fibre reinforcement (CFRP) and E-glass fibre reinforcement (GFRP) located on the face opposite to the blast. Numerical simulation was performed with LS-DYNA software. The study elements (concrete, steel and reinforcement) have been simulated in a Lagrangian formulation with solid elements, beam elements and shells, respectively. Three concrete models have been used and compared: CSCM, MAT72-R3 and RHT. As for the explosive, the CONWEP-based Load Blast Enhanced (LBE) card was used. Reinforcement with CFRP resulted in a generally reduced damage area on both surfaces. All models show a good correlation with the test results and a non-destructive damage estimation technique when comparing them in terms of damage area.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23773,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"WIT Transactions on the Built Environment\",\"volume\":\"98 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"WIT Transactions on the Built Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2495/hpsu220121\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WIT Transactions on the Built Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2495/hpsu220121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对外加FRP的钢筋混凝土(RC)板进行了数值模拟,并与实际试验结果进行了比较。石板的尺寸为4.4 x 1.46米,跨度为4米,厚度为15厘米。楼板采用C25/30级混凝土和B500C钢筋建造。共进行了7次试验,分别为0.83 m/kg 1/3、0.42 m/kg 1/3和0.21 m/kg 1/3。在最大比例尺处,楼板不加筋。在另外两种情况下,其中一种板没有额外的加固,而另外两种测试是在爆炸对面的面上使用碳纤维加固(CFRP)和e -玻璃纤维加固(GFRP)进行的。采用LS-DYNA软件进行数值模拟。研究单元(混凝土、钢和钢筋)分别用固体单元、梁单元和壳单元的拉格朗日公式进行了模拟。采用了CSCM、MAT72-R3和RHT三种具体模型并进行了比较。炸药采用基于conwep的负载爆炸增强(LBE)卡。用CFRP加固导致两个表面的损伤面积普遍减少。在损伤面积方面,各模型均与试验结果和无损损伤估计技术具有良好的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
FULL-SCALE REINFORCED CONCRETE SLABS WITH EXTERNAL REINFORCED POLYMER: FIELD TEST AND NUMERICAL COMPARISON
Numerical simulation of reinforced concrete (RC) slabs with the addition of an external reinforced polymer (FRP) have been developed and compared with full scale real tests. The size of the slabs was 4.4 x 1.46 m, with a span of 4 m, and a thickness of 15 cm. The slabs were built using concrete of class C25/30, and B500C reinforcing steel. Seven tests were conducted, one at a scaled distance of 0.83 m/kg 1/3 , three at a scaled distance of 0.42 m/kg 1/3 , and three at 0.21 m/kg 1/3 . For the biggest scaled distance, the slab had no extra reinforcement. In the other two cases one of the slabs had no extra reinforcement, while the other two tests were performed with carbon fibre reinforcement (CFRP) and E-glass fibre reinforcement (GFRP) located on the face opposite to the blast. Numerical simulation was performed with LS-DYNA software. The study elements (concrete, steel and reinforcement) have been simulated in a Lagrangian formulation with solid elements, beam elements and shells, respectively. Three concrete models have been used and compared: CSCM, MAT72-R3 and RHT. As for the explosive, the CONWEP-based Load Blast Enhanced (LBE) card was used. Reinforcement with CFRP resulted in a generally reduced damage area on both surfaces. All models show a good correlation with the test results and a non-destructive damage estimation technique when comparing them in terms of damage area.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信