慢性心肺疾病患者和健康人在休息和呼吸窦性心律失常加重时的自主心率控制

Michel Silva Reis, A. Deus, Rodrigo Polaquini Simões, Isabela A. V. Aniceto, A. M. Catai, A. Borghi-Silva
{"title":"慢性心肺疾病患者和健康人在休息和呼吸窦性心律失常加重时的自主心率控制","authors":"Michel Silva Reis, A. Deus, Rodrigo Polaquini Simões, Isabela A. V. Aniceto, A. M. Catai, A. Borghi-Silva","doi":"10.1590/S1413-35552010005000003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the autonomic modulation of heart rate (HR) at rest in the supine position and during a respiratory sinus arrhythmia maneuver (M-RSA) among participants with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or with chronic heart failure (CHF). METHODS: Twenty-eight men were divided into three groups: ten with COPD, aged 69±9 years; nine with CHF, aged 62±8 years; and nine healthy participants aged 64±5 years (controls). At rest, the R-R interval of the electrocardiographic signal was obtained in the following situations: 1) 15 min in the supine position; and 2) 4 min during M-RSA in the supine position. The data were analyzed in the time domain (RMSSD and SDNN indices) and the frequency domain (LFab and HFab). During M-RSA, the expiratory/inspiratory ratio (E/I) and the inspiratory/expiratory difference (∆IE) were calculated. RESULTS: The main findings showed that the CHF patients presented lower RMSSD (12.2±2.6 vs. 20.4±6.5), LFab (99.2±72.7 vs. 305.3±208.9) and HFab (53.4±29.9 vs. 178.9±113.1), compared with the controls. The LFab band was significantly lower in the COPD group than in the controls (133.8±145.5 vs. 305.3±208.9). Additionally, both CHF patients and COPD patients showed lower E/I ratios (1.1±0.06 vs. 1.2±0.1 and 1.1±0.03 vs. 1.2±0.1) and ∆IE values (7.0±3.5 vs. 12.7±0.1 and 4.9±1.6 vs. 12.7±0.1), respectively, compared with the controls during M-RSA. CONCLUSION: The results from this study suggest that both COPD and CHF have a negative impact on the autonomic control of heart rate. Article registered on the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) under the number: ACTRN12609000467235","PeriodicalId":21195,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira De Fisioterapia","volume":"9 1","pages":"106-113"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Controle autonômico da frequência cardíaca de pacientes com doenças cardiorrespiratórias crônicas e indivíduos saudáveis em repouso e durante a manobra de acentuação da arritmia sinusal respiratória\",\"authors\":\"Michel Silva Reis, A. Deus, Rodrigo Polaquini Simões, Isabela A. V. Aniceto, A. M. Catai, A. Borghi-Silva\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/S1413-35552010005000003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the autonomic modulation of heart rate (HR) at rest in the supine position and during a respiratory sinus arrhythmia maneuver (M-RSA) among participants with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or with chronic heart failure (CHF). METHODS: Twenty-eight men were divided into three groups: ten with COPD, aged 69±9 years; nine with CHF, aged 62±8 years; and nine healthy participants aged 64±5 years (controls). At rest, the R-R interval of the electrocardiographic signal was obtained in the following situations: 1) 15 min in the supine position; and 2) 4 min during M-RSA in the supine position. The data were analyzed in the time domain (RMSSD and SDNN indices) and the frequency domain (LFab and HFab). During M-RSA, the expiratory/inspiratory ratio (E/I) and the inspiratory/expiratory difference (∆IE) were calculated. RESULTS: The main findings showed that the CHF patients presented lower RMSSD (12.2±2.6 vs. 20.4±6.5), LFab (99.2±72.7 vs. 305.3±208.9) and HFab (53.4±29.9 vs. 178.9±113.1), compared with the controls. The LFab band was significantly lower in the COPD group than in the controls (133.8±145.5 vs. 305.3±208.9). Additionally, both CHF patients and COPD patients showed lower E/I ratios (1.1±0.06 vs. 1.2±0.1 and 1.1±0.03 vs. 1.2±0.1) and ∆IE values (7.0±3.5 vs. 12.7±0.1 and 4.9±1.6 vs. 12.7±0.1), respectively, compared with the controls during M-RSA. CONCLUSION: The results from this study suggest that both COPD and CHF have a negative impact on the autonomic control of heart rate. Article registered on the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) under the number: ACTRN12609000467235\",\"PeriodicalId\":21195,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Brasileira De Fisioterapia\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"106-113\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"20\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Brasileira De Fisioterapia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-35552010005000003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira De Fisioterapia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-35552010005000003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

摘要

目的:评估慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)或慢性心力衰竭(CHF)患者静息时仰卧位和呼吸窦性心律失常操作(M-RSA)期间心率(HR)的自主调节。方法:28名男性患者分为3组:10名COPD患者,年龄69±9岁;CHF 9例,年龄62±8岁;年龄64±5岁的健康受试者9例(对照组)。静息时,获取如下情况下心电图信号的R-R间隔:1)仰卧位15min;2)仰卧位M-RSA 4 min。在时域(RMSSD和SDNN指数)和频域(LFab和HFab)对数据进行分析。M-RSA期间,计算呼气/吸气比(E/I)和吸气/呼气差(∆IE)。结果:主要研究结果显示,CHF患者RMSSD(12.2±2.6比20.4±6.5)、LFab(99.2±72.7比305.3±208.9)、HFab(53.4±29.9比178.9±113.1)均低于对照组。COPD组LFab频带明显低于对照组(133.8±145.5∶305.3±208.9)。此外,在M-RSA期间,CHF患者和COPD患者的E/I比(1.1±0.06 vs. 1.2±0.1和1.1±0.03 vs. 1.2±0.1)和∆IE值(7.0±3.5 vs. 12.7±0.1和4.9±1.6 vs. 12.7±0.1)分别低于对照组。结论:本研究结果提示COPD和CHF对心率自主控制均有负面影响。文章在澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册中心(ANZCTR)注册,编号为:ACTRN12609000467235
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Controle autonômico da frequência cardíaca de pacientes com doenças cardiorrespiratórias crônicas e indivíduos saudáveis em repouso e durante a manobra de acentuação da arritmia sinusal respiratória
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the autonomic modulation of heart rate (HR) at rest in the supine position and during a respiratory sinus arrhythmia maneuver (M-RSA) among participants with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or with chronic heart failure (CHF). METHODS: Twenty-eight men were divided into three groups: ten with COPD, aged 69±9 years; nine with CHF, aged 62±8 years; and nine healthy participants aged 64±5 years (controls). At rest, the R-R interval of the electrocardiographic signal was obtained in the following situations: 1) 15 min in the supine position; and 2) 4 min during M-RSA in the supine position. The data were analyzed in the time domain (RMSSD and SDNN indices) and the frequency domain (LFab and HFab). During M-RSA, the expiratory/inspiratory ratio (E/I) and the inspiratory/expiratory difference (∆IE) were calculated. RESULTS: The main findings showed that the CHF patients presented lower RMSSD (12.2±2.6 vs. 20.4±6.5), LFab (99.2±72.7 vs. 305.3±208.9) and HFab (53.4±29.9 vs. 178.9±113.1), compared with the controls. The LFab band was significantly lower in the COPD group than in the controls (133.8±145.5 vs. 305.3±208.9). Additionally, both CHF patients and COPD patients showed lower E/I ratios (1.1±0.06 vs. 1.2±0.1 and 1.1±0.03 vs. 1.2±0.1) and ∆IE values (7.0±3.5 vs. 12.7±0.1 and 4.9±1.6 vs. 12.7±0.1), respectively, compared with the controls during M-RSA. CONCLUSION: The results from this study suggest that both COPD and CHF have a negative impact on the autonomic control of heart rate. Article registered on the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) under the number: ACTRN12609000467235
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信