Begoña García-Hernández, Antonio Duréndez, A. Rojo-Ramírez
{"title":"欧盟审计期望差距与强化的独立性标准:衡量欧盟新指令的效果","authors":"Begoña García-Hernández, Antonio Duréndez, A. Rojo-Ramírez","doi":"10.1080/01559982.2021.1954359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The European Union has addressed the moral hazard that auditors may present by doubly reinforcing auditor independence. This has been done through the formulation of a general principle of independence in conjunction with a preventive and sanctioning framework of safeguards and prohibitions. This article evaluates whether the audit expectation gap has provoked a shift towards increasing the protection of auditor independence. The Directive provides a new framework to harmonise and protect auditor independence in the EU. The article covers a gap in relation to the effects of new auditing regulations within the EU affecting the ethical problem of auditor independence and its connection to the audit expectation gap. A qualitative study addressed to a sample of 192 auditors has been developed. Following the structural equation modelling methodology (PLS-SEM), our results display evidence of a relationship between the audit expectation gap and auditor independence. Furthermore, the results show a mediating effect of new auditor safeguards and quality controls and a sanctioning system to protect independence when an audit expectation gap exists. The results also show that the more restrictive auditor prohibitions considered in the latest European reform have a positive effect on the protection of auditor independence.","PeriodicalId":47566,"journal":{"name":"Accounting Forum","volume":"12 1","pages":"264 - 286"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The audit expectation gap and strengthened independence standards in the European Union: measuring the effects of the new EU Directive\",\"authors\":\"Begoña García-Hernández, Antonio Duréndez, A. Rojo-Ramírez\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01559982.2021.1954359\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The European Union has addressed the moral hazard that auditors may present by doubly reinforcing auditor independence. This has been done through the formulation of a general principle of independence in conjunction with a preventive and sanctioning framework of safeguards and prohibitions. This article evaluates whether the audit expectation gap has provoked a shift towards increasing the protection of auditor independence. The Directive provides a new framework to harmonise and protect auditor independence in the EU. The article covers a gap in relation to the effects of new auditing regulations within the EU affecting the ethical problem of auditor independence and its connection to the audit expectation gap. A qualitative study addressed to a sample of 192 auditors has been developed. Following the structural equation modelling methodology (PLS-SEM), our results display evidence of a relationship between the audit expectation gap and auditor independence. Furthermore, the results show a mediating effect of new auditor safeguards and quality controls and a sanctioning system to protect independence when an audit expectation gap exists. The results also show that the more restrictive auditor prohibitions considered in the latest European reform have a positive effect on the protection of auditor independence.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47566,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounting Forum\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"264 - 286\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounting Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01559982.2021.1954359\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting Forum","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01559982.2021.1954359","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
The audit expectation gap and strengthened independence standards in the European Union: measuring the effects of the new EU Directive
ABSTRACT The European Union has addressed the moral hazard that auditors may present by doubly reinforcing auditor independence. This has been done through the formulation of a general principle of independence in conjunction with a preventive and sanctioning framework of safeguards and prohibitions. This article evaluates whether the audit expectation gap has provoked a shift towards increasing the protection of auditor independence. The Directive provides a new framework to harmonise and protect auditor independence in the EU. The article covers a gap in relation to the effects of new auditing regulations within the EU affecting the ethical problem of auditor independence and its connection to the audit expectation gap. A qualitative study addressed to a sample of 192 auditors has been developed. Following the structural equation modelling methodology (PLS-SEM), our results display evidence of a relationship between the audit expectation gap and auditor independence. Furthermore, the results show a mediating effect of new auditor safeguards and quality controls and a sanctioning system to protect independence when an audit expectation gap exists. The results also show that the more restrictive auditor prohibitions considered in the latest European reform have a positive effect on the protection of auditor independence.
期刊介绍:
Accounting Forum publishes authoritative yet accessible articles which advance our knowledge of theory and practice in all areas of accounting, business finance and related subjects. The journal both promotes greater understanding of the role of business in the global environment, and provides a forum for the intellectual exchange of academic research in business fields, particularly in the accounting profession. Covering a range of topical issues in accounting, business finance and related fields, Accounting Forum''s main areas of interest are: accounting theory; auditing; financial accounting; finance and accounting education; management accounting; small business; social and environmental accounting; and taxation. Of equal interest to practitioners, academics, and students, each issue of the journal includes peer-reviewed articles, notes and comments section.