早期阿达木单抗或免疫调节剂对克罗恩病患者术后缓解维持的疗效:随机研究

A. Yamada, H. Iwashita, S. Okazumi, H. Kikuchi, Yasuo Suzuki, K. Matsuoka
{"title":"早期阿达木单抗或免疫调节剂对克罗恩病患者术后缓解维持的疗效:随机研究","authors":"A. Yamada, H. Iwashita, S. Okazumi, H. Kikuchi, Yasuo Suzuki, K. Matsuoka","doi":"10.35248/2167-0870.20.10.401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Aim: This study aim was to clarify the efficacy of early adalimumab (ADA) and azathioprine (AZA) in Postoperative recurrence of Crohn’s disease (CD). Methods: In a 78-week single-center prospective study, patients with bowel resection were randomly assigned to ADA 160-80-40 mg subcutaneously (SC) or AZA 0.5-1.5 mg/kg/day. The primary endpoint was endoscopic remission at 18 months (Rutgeerts i0, i1 and Simple endoscopic score for CD (SES-CD) ≤ 4). Results: A total of 47 patients (median age 39.0 years, disease duration 9.5 years, 19.1% smokers, 44.6% previous resections) were recruited, 39 patients were received the study drugs. Endoscopic remission was confirmed in 5/16 patients in the AZA group (31.2%) and 7/12 patients in the ADA group (58.3%) (p=0.24) in the intention-to-treat population. In the per-protocol population (19 patients with evaluable images), remission was recorded in 3/9 (33.3%) patients in the AZA and 7/10 (70.0%) in the ADA group (p=0.17). Re-surgery rate was trend to higher in the AZA group (21.1%) than in the ADA group (0%) (p=0.10). Treatment was discontinued due to adverse events in 6 patients (15.3%), severe adverse events were significantly more frequent in the AZA group than in the ADA group (AZA, 25.0% vs ADA, 0%; p=0.04). Conclusions: Early ADA did not show statistically better efficacy than AZA for postoperative CD recurrence in this study, although safety profile of ADA is better. (UMIN000032485).","PeriodicalId":15375,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical trials","volume":"30 1","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of Early Adalimumab or Immunomodulator on Postoperative Remission Maintenance in Patients with Crohn's Disease: Randomized study\",\"authors\":\"A. Yamada, H. Iwashita, S. Okazumi, H. Kikuchi, Yasuo Suzuki, K. Matsuoka\",\"doi\":\"10.35248/2167-0870.20.10.401\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background and Aim: This study aim was to clarify the efficacy of early adalimumab (ADA) and azathioprine (AZA) in Postoperative recurrence of Crohn’s disease (CD). Methods: In a 78-week single-center prospective study, patients with bowel resection were randomly assigned to ADA 160-80-40 mg subcutaneously (SC) or AZA 0.5-1.5 mg/kg/day. The primary endpoint was endoscopic remission at 18 months (Rutgeerts i0, i1 and Simple endoscopic score for CD (SES-CD) ≤ 4). Results: A total of 47 patients (median age 39.0 years, disease duration 9.5 years, 19.1% smokers, 44.6% previous resections) were recruited, 39 patients were received the study drugs. Endoscopic remission was confirmed in 5/16 patients in the AZA group (31.2%) and 7/12 patients in the ADA group (58.3%) (p=0.24) in the intention-to-treat population. In the per-protocol population (19 patients with evaluable images), remission was recorded in 3/9 (33.3%) patients in the AZA and 7/10 (70.0%) in the ADA group (p=0.17). Re-surgery rate was trend to higher in the AZA group (21.1%) than in the ADA group (0%) (p=0.10). Treatment was discontinued due to adverse events in 6 patients (15.3%), severe adverse events were significantly more frequent in the AZA group than in the ADA group (AZA, 25.0% vs ADA, 0%; p=0.04). Conclusions: Early ADA did not show statistically better efficacy than AZA for postoperative CD recurrence in this study, although safety profile of ADA is better. (UMIN000032485).\",\"PeriodicalId\":15375,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of clinical trials\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"1-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of clinical trials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35248/2167-0870.20.10.401\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical trials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35248/2167-0870.20.10.401","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:本研究旨在阐明早期阿达木单抗(ADA)和硫唑嘌呤(AZA)治疗克罗恩病(CD)术后复发的疗效。方法:在一项为期78周的单中心前瞻性研究中,进行肠切除术的患者被随机分配给ADA 160-80-40 mg皮下注射(SC)或AZA 0.5-1.5 mg/kg/天。主要终点为内镜下18个月的缓解(Rutgeerts i、i和Simple内镜下CD评分(SES-CD)≤4)。结果:共招募了47例患者(中位年龄39.0岁,病程9.5年,吸烟19.1%,既往手术44.6%),39例患者接受了研究药物。在意向治疗人群中,5/16的AZA组患者(31.2%)和7/12的ADA组患者(58.3%)的内镜下缓解得到证实(p=0.24)。在按方案人群(19例可评估图像的患者)中,AZA组3/9(33.3%)患者缓解,ADA组7/10(70.0%)患者缓解(p=0.17)。AZA组再手术率(21.1%)高于ADA组(0%)(p=0.10)。6例患者(15.3%)因不良事件停止治疗,AZA组严重不良事件发生率明显高于ADA组(AZA, 25.0% vs ADA, 0%;p = 0.04)。结论:在本研究中,早期ADA治疗CD术后复发的疗效没有统计学上优于AZA,尽管ADA的安全性更好。(UMIN000032485)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy of Early Adalimumab or Immunomodulator on Postoperative Remission Maintenance in Patients with Crohn's Disease: Randomized study
Background and Aim: This study aim was to clarify the efficacy of early adalimumab (ADA) and azathioprine (AZA) in Postoperative recurrence of Crohn’s disease (CD). Methods: In a 78-week single-center prospective study, patients with bowel resection were randomly assigned to ADA 160-80-40 mg subcutaneously (SC) or AZA 0.5-1.5 mg/kg/day. The primary endpoint was endoscopic remission at 18 months (Rutgeerts i0, i1 and Simple endoscopic score for CD (SES-CD) ≤ 4). Results: A total of 47 patients (median age 39.0 years, disease duration 9.5 years, 19.1% smokers, 44.6% previous resections) were recruited, 39 patients were received the study drugs. Endoscopic remission was confirmed in 5/16 patients in the AZA group (31.2%) and 7/12 patients in the ADA group (58.3%) (p=0.24) in the intention-to-treat population. In the per-protocol population (19 patients with evaluable images), remission was recorded in 3/9 (33.3%) patients in the AZA and 7/10 (70.0%) in the ADA group (p=0.17). Re-surgery rate was trend to higher in the AZA group (21.1%) than in the ADA group (0%) (p=0.10). Treatment was discontinued due to adverse events in 6 patients (15.3%), severe adverse events were significantly more frequent in the AZA group than in the ADA group (AZA, 25.0% vs ADA, 0%; p=0.04). Conclusions: Early ADA did not show statistically better efficacy than AZA for postoperative CD recurrence in this study, although safety profile of ADA is better. (UMIN000032485).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信