管理和估计关闭和回收责任-一个从业者的观点1

M. Slight, H. Lacy
{"title":"管理和估计关闭和回收责任-一个从业者的观点1","authors":"M. Slight, H. Lacy","doi":"10.21000/JASMR15020122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the global mining industry's focus on Sustainable Development, there has been a significant emphasis on mine closure and reclamation performance and reporting through the development of the International Council on Mining Metals (ICMM) Sustainable Development Framework and Principles, the Minerals Council of Australia's (MCA) Enduring Value Framework for Sustainable Development, the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), and the Equator Principles. In addition financial reporting obligations under International Financial Reporting Standards and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (2002) have also led to better understanding and improvements with industry closure performance, liability management, and reporting, and provide improved guidance on evaluating and measuring liability. Under these sustainable development principles and financial reporting obligations, mining companies are required to self-regulate their compliance to these obligations for mine closure planning and associated cost estimates across all life cycle phases of their mining projects. Internal processes should be developed within mining companies to better understand their closure liabilities and obligations. The likely closure costs and cost estimating processes should be developed for long-term life of mine (asset) planning and budgeting, financial reporting for corporate balance sheet provisioning purposes, and regulator reporting for environmental bonding and financial assurances. Mining companies need to plan for, prepare, and actually \"mine for closure\" right from the start of a project. This means that their closure and reclamation liabilities throughout each stage of the mine life cycle phases; exploration, during feasibility studies and mine construction, start-up and operations through to the last day of production and beyond, must be understood, planned for, managed, and controlled. This paper will discuss how these closure liabilities are calculated, how they are utilised internally within an organisation and what must they deliver in terms of improvement, performance, and reputation. Early recognition of closure and reclamation liabilities promotes improved strategies for operations to plan additional mitigation strategies and anticipate progressive closure and rehabilitation activities. Closure planning creates shareholder value if these long-term liabilities can be reduced or eliminated during operations. A well-established closure planning process combined with a closure and reclamation cost estimating process ensures investment, development, and operating decisions made today are made in full recognition of the potential financial impacts for closure in the future.","PeriodicalId":17230,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Society of Mining and Reclamation","volume":"4 1","pages":"122-132"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MANAGING AND ESTIMATING CLOSURE AND RECLAMATION LIABILITIES - A PRACTITIONER'S VIEW 1\",\"authors\":\"M. Slight, H. Lacy\",\"doi\":\"10.21000/JASMR15020122\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With the global mining industry's focus on Sustainable Development, there has been a significant emphasis on mine closure and reclamation performance and reporting through the development of the International Council on Mining Metals (ICMM) Sustainable Development Framework and Principles, the Minerals Council of Australia's (MCA) Enduring Value Framework for Sustainable Development, the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), and the Equator Principles. In addition financial reporting obligations under International Financial Reporting Standards and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (2002) have also led to better understanding and improvements with industry closure performance, liability management, and reporting, and provide improved guidance on evaluating and measuring liability. Under these sustainable development principles and financial reporting obligations, mining companies are required to self-regulate their compliance to these obligations for mine closure planning and associated cost estimates across all life cycle phases of their mining projects. Internal processes should be developed within mining companies to better understand their closure liabilities and obligations. The likely closure costs and cost estimating processes should be developed for long-term life of mine (asset) planning and budgeting, financial reporting for corporate balance sheet provisioning purposes, and regulator reporting for environmental bonding and financial assurances. Mining companies need to plan for, prepare, and actually \\\"mine for closure\\\" right from the start of a project. This means that their closure and reclamation liabilities throughout each stage of the mine life cycle phases; exploration, during feasibility studies and mine construction, start-up and operations through to the last day of production and beyond, must be understood, planned for, managed, and controlled. This paper will discuss how these closure liabilities are calculated, how they are utilised internally within an organisation and what must they deliver in terms of improvement, performance, and reputation. Early recognition of closure and reclamation liabilities promotes improved strategies for operations to plan additional mitigation strategies and anticipate progressive closure and rehabilitation activities. Closure planning creates shareholder value if these long-term liabilities can be reduced or eliminated during operations. A well-established closure planning process combined with a closure and reclamation cost estimating process ensures investment, development, and operating decisions made today are made in full recognition of the potential financial impacts for closure in the future.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17230,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Society of Mining and Reclamation\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"122-132\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Society of Mining and Reclamation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21000/JASMR15020122\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Society of Mining and Reclamation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21000/JASMR15020122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

随着全球采矿业对可持续发展的关注,通过国际矿业金属理事会(ICMM)可持续发展框架和原则、澳大利亚矿产理事会(MCA)可持续发展持久价值框架、全球报告倡议组织(GRI)和赤道原则的发展,对矿山关闭和回收绩效和报告的重视程度越来越高。此外,国际财务报告准则和萨班斯-奥克斯利法案(2002年)下的财务报告义务也导致了对行业关闭绩效、负债管理和报告的更好理解和改进,并为评估和衡量负债提供了改进的指导。根据这些可持续发展原则和财务报告义务,采矿公司必须在其采矿项目的所有生命周期阶段自行调节其对这些义务的遵守情况,以便进行矿山关闭规划和有关的费用估计。应在矿业公司内部制订内部程序,以便更好地了解它们的关闭责任和义务。应该为矿山(资产)的长期寿命规划和预算制定可能的关闭成本和成本估计程序,为公司资产负债表提供财务报告,以及为环境担保和财务保证编制监管报告。矿业公司需要从项目一开始就计划、准备和实际“为关闭而开采”。这意味着它们在矿山生命周期各阶段的关闭和复垦责任;勘探,在可行性研究和矿山建设,启动和操作,直到最后一天的生产和以后,必须了解,计划,管理和控制。本文将讨论如何计算这些关闭责任,如何在组织内部使用它们,以及它们必须在改进,绩效和声誉方面提供什么。尽早确认关闭和填海责任有助于改进业务战略,以规划更多的缓解战略,并预测逐步关闭和恢复活动。如果这些长期负债能够在运营期间减少或消除,关闭计划将为股东创造价值。一个完善的关闭计划程序,结合关闭和复垦成本估算程序,确保今天作出的投资、开发和运营决策充分认识到未来关闭的潜在财务影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
MANAGING AND ESTIMATING CLOSURE AND RECLAMATION LIABILITIES - A PRACTITIONER'S VIEW 1
With the global mining industry's focus on Sustainable Development, there has been a significant emphasis on mine closure and reclamation performance and reporting through the development of the International Council on Mining Metals (ICMM) Sustainable Development Framework and Principles, the Minerals Council of Australia's (MCA) Enduring Value Framework for Sustainable Development, the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), and the Equator Principles. In addition financial reporting obligations under International Financial Reporting Standards and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (2002) have also led to better understanding and improvements with industry closure performance, liability management, and reporting, and provide improved guidance on evaluating and measuring liability. Under these sustainable development principles and financial reporting obligations, mining companies are required to self-regulate their compliance to these obligations for mine closure planning and associated cost estimates across all life cycle phases of their mining projects. Internal processes should be developed within mining companies to better understand their closure liabilities and obligations. The likely closure costs and cost estimating processes should be developed for long-term life of mine (asset) planning and budgeting, financial reporting for corporate balance sheet provisioning purposes, and regulator reporting for environmental bonding and financial assurances. Mining companies need to plan for, prepare, and actually "mine for closure" right from the start of a project. This means that their closure and reclamation liabilities throughout each stage of the mine life cycle phases; exploration, during feasibility studies and mine construction, start-up and operations through to the last day of production and beyond, must be understood, planned for, managed, and controlled. This paper will discuss how these closure liabilities are calculated, how they are utilised internally within an organisation and what must they deliver in terms of improvement, performance, and reputation. Early recognition of closure and reclamation liabilities promotes improved strategies for operations to plan additional mitigation strategies and anticipate progressive closure and rehabilitation activities. Closure planning creates shareholder value if these long-term liabilities can be reduced or eliminated during operations. A well-established closure planning process combined with a closure and reclamation cost estimating process ensures investment, development, and operating decisions made today are made in full recognition of the potential financial impacts for closure in the future.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信