{"title":"主权vs影响力","authors":"Teemu J. Häkkinen, Miina Kaarkoski","doi":"10.3167/choc.2018.130203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is not a coincidence that perceptions of sovereignty were key reasons\nwhy the United Kingdom referendum on European Union membership\nended in a victory for the Leave side. In this article, we will apply methods\nof conceptual history to parliamentary debates in order to trace the development\nof sovereignty as a political concept in Europe-related debates\nthrough studies of four periods between 1945 and 2016. We will show that\nboth supporters and opponents of European unity deliberately used the\nBritish position on sovereignty in political struggles throughout the analyzed\nperiod. The concept was used above all to describe the traditional\nview of the supremacy of British parliamentary sovereignty, but it was also\nused for different purposes to create a perception of how sovereignty could\nor could not be modified in dealing with an integrating Europe.","PeriodicalId":42746,"journal":{"name":"Contributions to the History of Concepts","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sovereignty versus Influence\",\"authors\":\"Teemu J. Häkkinen, Miina Kaarkoski\",\"doi\":\"10.3167/choc.2018.130203\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is not a coincidence that perceptions of sovereignty were key reasons\\nwhy the United Kingdom referendum on European Union membership\\nended in a victory for the Leave side. In this article, we will apply methods\\nof conceptual history to parliamentary debates in order to trace the development\\nof sovereignty as a political concept in Europe-related debates\\nthrough studies of four periods between 1945 and 2016. We will show that\\nboth supporters and opponents of European unity deliberately used the\\nBritish position on sovereignty in political struggles throughout the analyzed\\nperiod. The concept was used above all to describe the traditional\\nview of the supremacy of British parliamentary sovereignty, but it was also\\nused for different purposes to create a perception of how sovereignty could\\nor could not be modified in dealing with an integrating Europe.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42746,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contributions to the History of Concepts\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contributions to the History of Concepts\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3167/choc.2018.130203\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contributions to the History of Concepts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3167/choc.2018.130203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
It is not a coincidence that perceptions of sovereignty were key reasons
why the United Kingdom referendum on European Union membership
ended in a victory for the Leave side. In this article, we will apply methods
of conceptual history to parliamentary debates in order to trace the development
of sovereignty as a political concept in Europe-related debates
through studies of four periods between 1945 and 2016. We will show that
both supporters and opponents of European unity deliberately used the
British position on sovereignty in political struggles throughout the analyzed
period. The concept was used above all to describe the traditional
view of the supremacy of British parliamentary sovereignty, but it was also
used for different purposes to create a perception of how sovereignty could
or could not be modified in dealing with an integrating Europe.