Igor Mikhalskiy
{"title":"Volodymyr Levynskyi’s letter to Mykola Hankevych (1915)","authors":"Igor Mikhalskiy","doi":"10.12958/2227-2844-2023-2(356)-23-29","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At the present stage of development of Ukrainian historical science, increasingly greater attention is paid to the study of sources of personal origin. In Western scholarship, they are regarded as ego-documents and are more important for the reconstruction of the past, both distant and recent. In many cases the documents of this group are the central ones. It is noted that the letters, as a historical source, are sources of personal origin and have their own specifics. Scientists have repeatedly emphasized that it “consists, firstly, in a vivid manifestation of the subjective perception of events, requiring a scientific critical attitude to this source; secondly, each epoch and each period of history left its mark not only on changes, but also on the form of letters”. Therefore, to study the relationship between different historical and political figures of a particular epoch, it is necessary to use ego-documents, in particular correspondence. It is emphasized that people’s letters to each other, being sources of a unique nature, express not only their instantaneous reactions to events, but also allow reconstructing the system of their relationships through arguments and evaluations of certain events and ideas. Furthermore, correspondence materials have an essential characteristic: being part of the context of human life, they are at the same time authentic sources for the formation of scientific ideas about this context. It is possible to create a complete picture of the activities of individuals in difficult periods of history only by considering the specifics of this context. The published letter reflects the political position of one of the prominent figures of the Ukrainian national liberation movement at the beginning of the 20th century, Volodymyr Levynskyi.","PeriodicalId":33822,"journal":{"name":"Visnik Kiivs''kij nacional''nij universitet imeni Tarasa Sevcenka Istoria","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Visnik Kiivs''kij nacional''nij universitet imeni Tarasa Sevcenka Istoria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12958/2227-2844-2023-2(356)-23-29","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在乌克兰史学发展的现阶段,个人出身来源的研究越来越受到重视。在西方学术中,它们被视为自我文件,对于重建过去更重要,无论是遥远的还是最近的。在许多情况下,这组文件是中心文件。值得注意的是,这些信件,作为一个历史来源,是个人来源,有自己的细节。科学家们一再强调,它“首先是对事件的主观感知的生动表现,需要对这一来源持科学的批判态度;其次,每一个时代、每一个历史时期不仅在变化上留下了印记,而且在文字的形式上也留下了印记。因此,研究特定时代不同历史政治人物之间的关系,有必要使用自我文献,特别是书信。强调人与人之间的书信作为一种独特的来源,不仅表达了他们对事件的即时反应,而且还允许通过对某些事件和思想的争论和评价来重建他们的关系系统。此外,通信材料有一个基本特征:作为人类生活背景的一部分,它们同时也是关于这一背景的科学思想形成的真实来源。只有考虑到这一背景的具体情况,才有可能对历史上困难时期的个人活动形成一幅完整的图景。这封公开的信件反映了20世纪初乌克兰民族解放运动的杰出人物之一弗拉基米尔·列文斯基(Volodymyr levynsky)的政治立场。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Volodymyr Levynskyi’s letter to Mykola Hankevych (1915)
At the present stage of development of Ukrainian historical science, increasingly greater attention is paid to the study of sources of personal origin. In Western scholarship, they are regarded as ego-documents and are more important for the reconstruction of the past, both distant and recent. In many cases the documents of this group are the central ones. It is noted that the letters, as a historical source, are sources of personal origin and have their own specifics. Scientists have repeatedly emphasized that it “consists, firstly, in a vivid manifestation of the subjective perception of events, requiring a scientific critical attitude to this source; secondly, each epoch and each period of history left its mark not only on changes, but also on the form of letters”. Therefore, to study the relationship between different historical and political figures of a particular epoch, it is necessary to use ego-documents, in particular correspondence. It is emphasized that people’s letters to each other, being sources of a unique nature, express not only their instantaneous reactions to events, but also allow reconstructing the system of their relationships through arguments and evaluations of certain events and ideas. Furthermore, correspondence materials have an essential characteristic: being part of the context of human life, they are at the same time authentic sources for the formation of scientific ideas about this context. It is possible to create a complete picture of the activities of individuals in difficult periods of history only by considering the specifics of this context. The published letter reflects the political position of one of the prominent figures of the Ukrainian national liberation movement at the beginning of the 20th century, Volodymyr Levynskyi.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信