美德与实际的理性。介绍注意事项

IF 0.2 0 PHILOSOPHY
G. Anna
{"title":"美德与实际的理性。介绍注意事项","authors":"G. Anna","doi":"10.4454/PHILINQ.V7I2.262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Current discussions on practical reason often overlook the contribution that virtue ethics can offer to that topic. Virtue ethics might seem unrelated to practical reason, since it ensued from Elizabeth Anscombe’s emphasis on the first-personal perspective in the explanation of action and focuses on the character of the agent, rather than on reason. This paper suggests that the focus on character is not incompatible with the acknowledgement of the relevance of practical reason in action, but, quite the contrary, offers a privileged standpoint to understand how reason can operate in practice.","PeriodicalId":41386,"journal":{"name":"Philosophical Inquiries","volume":"9 1","pages":"63-70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The virtues and practical reason. Introductory considerations\",\"authors\":\"G. Anna\",\"doi\":\"10.4454/PHILINQ.V7I2.262\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Current discussions on practical reason often overlook the contribution that virtue ethics can offer to that topic. Virtue ethics might seem unrelated to practical reason, since it ensued from Elizabeth Anscombe’s emphasis on the first-personal perspective in the explanation of action and focuses on the character of the agent, rather than on reason. This paper suggests that the focus on character is not incompatible with the acknowledgement of the relevance of practical reason in action, but, quite the contrary, offers a privileged standpoint to understand how reason can operate in practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41386,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Philosophical Inquiries\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"63-70\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Philosophical Inquiries\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4454/PHILINQ.V7I2.262\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophical Inquiries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4454/PHILINQ.V7I2.262","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前关于实践理性的讨论往往忽视了美德伦理对这一主题的贡献。美德伦理似乎与实践理性无关,因为它源于伊丽莎白·安斯科姆(Elizabeth Anscombe)在解释行为时强调的第一人称视角,关注的是行为人的性格,而不是理性。本文认为,对性格的关注与对实践理性在行动中的相关性的承认并不矛盾,相反,它提供了一个特权的立场来理解理性如何在实践中运作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The virtues and practical reason. Introductory considerations
Current discussions on practical reason often overlook the contribution that virtue ethics can offer to that topic. Virtue ethics might seem unrelated to practical reason, since it ensued from Elizabeth Anscombe’s emphasis on the first-personal perspective in the explanation of action and focuses on the character of the agent, rather than on reason. This paper suggests that the focus on character is not incompatible with the acknowledgement of the relevance of practical reason in action, but, quite the contrary, offers a privileged standpoint to understand how reason can operate in practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信