早产儿感染与未感染婴儿维生素D水平的比较

H. Boskabadi, M. Zakerihamidi, Raheleh Faramarzi
{"title":"早产儿感染与未感染婴儿维生素D水平的比较","authors":"H. Boskabadi, M. Zakerihamidi, Raheleh Faramarzi","doi":"10.15789/2220-7619-cot-8050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Despite the substantial progress in intensive cares, sepsis is still an important cause of neonatal mortality. Given the role of vitamin D in infection control; therfore, this study was conducted to compare vitamin D level in infected and uninfected preterm infants. \nMaterials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was carried out on 87 preterm infants(45 infected infants and 42 uninfected infants) hospitalized in Mashhad Ghaem Hospital,Iran, during 2015-2017. . The subjects were selected by using convenience sampling. . The infected infants (n=45) included babies with clinical and laboratory findings compatible with infection and/or positive blood or cerebrospinal fluid cultures. The serum levels vitamin D were measured in all infants. A researcher-made questionnaire containing demographic, clinical and laboratory features of infants was used. In addition, independent t-test and chi-square test were applied. SPSS was used to perform the statistical data analysis. . \nResults: 83% of infants had Vitamin D deficiency 34.5%, 26.4%, and 21.8% of whom exhibited severe (less than 10ngml), moderate (10.1-20ngml), mild deficiency (20.1-30ngml), respectively. The mean vitamin D level of infants was 23.319.40ng/ml in the control group and 11.028.64ng/ml in the case group (P=0.000). In the case group, the mean vitamin D was 8.145.53ngml in early sepsis and 12.629.75ngml in late-onset sepsis (P=0.121). 95% of infected infants and 71% of uninfected infants had vitamin D less than 30ngml (P=0.003). \nConclusion: Vitamin D deficiency is very common in preterm infants. Serum vitamin D levels in infants with sepsis were lower than those in uninfected infants. Therefore, the correction of Vitamin D deficiency may contribute to better control of neonatal infection.","PeriodicalId":21412,"journal":{"name":"Russian Journal of Infection and Immunity","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the Level of Vitamin D in Preterm Infected and Uninfected Infants\",\"authors\":\"H. Boskabadi, M. Zakerihamidi, Raheleh Faramarzi\",\"doi\":\"10.15789/2220-7619-cot-8050\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Despite the substantial progress in intensive cares, sepsis is still an important cause of neonatal mortality. Given the role of vitamin D in infection control; therfore, this study was conducted to compare vitamin D level in infected and uninfected preterm infants. \\nMaterials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was carried out on 87 preterm infants(45 infected infants and 42 uninfected infants) hospitalized in Mashhad Ghaem Hospital,Iran, during 2015-2017. . The subjects were selected by using convenience sampling. . The infected infants (n=45) included babies with clinical and laboratory findings compatible with infection and/or positive blood or cerebrospinal fluid cultures. The serum levels vitamin D were measured in all infants. A researcher-made questionnaire containing demographic, clinical and laboratory features of infants was used. In addition, independent t-test and chi-square test were applied. SPSS was used to perform the statistical data analysis. . \\nResults: 83% of infants had Vitamin D deficiency 34.5%, 26.4%, and 21.8% of whom exhibited severe (less than 10ngml), moderate (10.1-20ngml), mild deficiency (20.1-30ngml), respectively. The mean vitamin D level of infants was 23.319.40ng/ml in the control group and 11.028.64ng/ml in the case group (P=0.000). In the case group, the mean vitamin D was 8.145.53ngml in early sepsis and 12.629.75ngml in late-onset sepsis (P=0.121). 95% of infected infants and 71% of uninfected infants had vitamin D less than 30ngml (P=0.003). \\nConclusion: Vitamin D deficiency is very common in preterm infants. Serum vitamin D levels in infants with sepsis were lower than those in uninfected infants. Therefore, the correction of Vitamin D deficiency may contribute to better control of neonatal infection.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21412,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Russian Journal of Infection and Immunity\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Russian Journal of Infection and Immunity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15789/2220-7619-cot-8050\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian Journal of Infection and Immunity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15789/2220-7619-cot-8050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:尽管重症监护取得了实质性进展,但脓毒症仍然是新生儿死亡的重要原因。鉴于维生素D在感染控制中的作用;因此,本研究旨在比较感染和未感染早产儿的维生素D水平。材料与方法:本研究对2015-2017年在伊朗Mashhad Ghaem医院住院的87例早产儿(45例感染婴儿和42例未感染婴儿)进行了横断面研究。采用方便抽样的方法选择研究对象。受感染的婴儿(n=45)包括临床和实验室结果符合感染和/或血液或脑脊液培养阳性的婴儿。测定了所有婴儿的血清维生素D水平。研究人员制作了一份调查问卷,其中包含了婴儿的人口学、临床和实验室特征。采用独立t检验和卡方检验。采用SPSS软件对统计数据进行分析。结果:83%的婴儿存在维生素D缺乏症,其中34.5%、26.4%和21.8%分别表现为重度(低于10ngml)、中度(10.1-20ngml)和轻度(20.1-30ngml)缺乏症。对照组婴儿平均维生素D水平为23.319.40ng/ml,病例组婴儿平均维生素D水平为11.028.64ng/ml (P=0.000)。在病例组中,早期败血症的平均维生素D为8.145.53ngml,迟发性败血症的平均维生素D为12.629.75ngml (P=0.121)。95%的感染婴儿和71%的未感染婴儿维生素D含量低于30ngml (P=0.003)。结论:维生素D缺乏症在早产儿中很常见。败血症婴儿血清维生素D水平低于未感染婴儿。因此,纠正维生素D缺乏可能有助于更好地控制新生儿感染。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of the Level of Vitamin D in Preterm Infected and Uninfected Infants
Introduction: Despite the substantial progress in intensive cares, sepsis is still an important cause of neonatal mortality. Given the role of vitamin D in infection control; therfore, this study was conducted to compare vitamin D level in infected and uninfected preterm infants. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was carried out on 87 preterm infants(45 infected infants and 42 uninfected infants) hospitalized in Mashhad Ghaem Hospital,Iran, during 2015-2017. . The subjects were selected by using convenience sampling. . The infected infants (n=45) included babies with clinical and laboratory findings compatible with infection and/or positive blood or cerebrospinal fluid cultures. The serum levels vitamin D were measured in all infants. A researcher-made questionnaire containing demographic, clinical and laboratory features of infants was used. In addition, independent t-test and chi-square test were applied. SPSS was used to perform the statistical data analysis. . Results: 83% of infants had Vitamin D deficiency 34.5%, 26.4%, and 21.8% of whom exhibited severe (less than 10ngml), moderate (10.1-20ngml), mild deficiency (20.1-30ngml), respectively. The mean vitamin D level of infants was 23.319.40ng/ml in the control group and 11.028.64ng/ml in the case group (P=0.000). In the case group, the mean vitamin D was 8.145.53ngml in early sepsis and 12.629.75ngml in late-onset sepsis (P=0.121). 95% of infected infants and 71% of uninfected infants had vitamin D less than 30ngml (P=0.003). Conclusion: Vitamin D deficiency is very common in preterm infants. Serum vitamin D levels in infants with sepsis were lower than those in uninfected infants. Therefore, the correction of Vitamin D deficiency may contribute to better control of neonatal infection.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信