基于认知工作分析的设计方法思考:系统设计与集成系统设计

N. Naikar, Ben Elix
{"title":"基于认知工作分析的设计方法思考:系统设计与集成系统设计","authors":"N. Naikar, Ben Elix","doi":"10.1145/2970930.2970951","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the relationships and distinctions between existing design approaches based on cognitive work analysis (CWA). Emphasis is placed on considering the use of CWA for system design, as outlined by Vicente [18], and for integrated system design, as called for by Vicente [19] and developed by Naikar and Elix [8,9]. Of note are some key distinctions in the perspectives of integrated system design. Specifically, although it was not Vicente's [19] intention to provide a comprehensive discussion, a clear difference between his approach and the one Naikar and Elix [8,9] propose concerns the level of integration. In the former, the designs of various system elements, such as the interfaces and teams, would be integrated in relation to a reduced space of possibilities for action. This shortcoming arises because the designs would be confined to organisational structures prevalent in recurring situations and potentially restricted by the design decided for the team. Such an approach could inhibit a system's inherent capacity for adaptation.","PeriodicalId":93284,"journal":{"name":"ECCE ... : proceedings of the ... European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics. European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Consideration of Design Approaches Based on Cognitive Work Analysis: System Design and Integrated System Design\",\"authors\":\"N. Naikar, Ben Elix\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2970930.2970951\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper examines the relationships and distinctions between existing design approaches based on cognitive work analysis (CWA). Emphasis is placed on considering the use of CWA for system design, as outlined by Vicente [18], and for integrated system design, as called for by Vicente [19] and developed by Naikar and Elix [8,9]. Of note are some key distinctions in the perspectives of integrated system design. Specifically, although it was not Vicente's [19] intention to provide a comprehensive discussion, a clear difference between his approach and the one Naikar and Elix [8,9] propose concerns the level of integration. In the former, the designs of various system elements, such as the interfaces and teams, would be integrated in relation to a reduced space of possibilities for action. This shortcoming arises because the designs would be confined to organisational structures prevalent in recurring situations and potentially restricted by the design decided for the team. Such an approach could inhibit a system's inherent capacity for adaptation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93284,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ECCE ... : proceedings of the ... European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics. European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ECCE ... : proceedings of the ... European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics. European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2970930.2970951\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ECCE ... : proceedings of the ... European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics. European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2970930.2970951","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

本文考察了基于认知工作分析(CWA)的现有设计方法之间的关系和区别。重点是考虑在系统设计中使用CWA,如Vicente[18]所概述的,以及在集成系统设计中使用CWA,如Vicente[19]所要求的,并由Naikar和Elix[8,9]发展。值得注意的是,在集成系统设计的观点中有一些关键的区别。具体来说,尽管Vicente[19]无意提供全面的讨论,但他的方法与Naikar和Elix[8,9]提出的方法之间的明显区别在于整合水平。在前者中,各种系统元素(如界面和团队)的设计将与减少的行动可能性空间相结合。这个缺点的出现是因为设计将局限于在反复出现的情况下普遍存在的组织结构,并且可能受到为团队决定的设计的限制。这种方法可能会抑制系统固有的适应能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Consideration of Design Approaches Based on Cognitive Work Analysis: System Design and Integrated System Design
This paper examines the relationships and distinctions between existing design approaches based on cognitive work analysis (CWA). Emphasis is placed on considering the use of CWA for system design, as outlined by Vicente [18], and for integrated system design, as called for by Vicente [19] and developed by Naikar and Elix [8,9]. Of note are some key distinctions in the perspectives of integrated system design. Specifically, although it was not Vicente's [19] intention to provide a comprehensive discussion, a clear difference between his approach and the one Naikar and Elix [8,9] propose concerns the level of integration. In the former, the designs of various system elements, such as the interfaces and teams, would be integrated in relation to a reduced space of possibilities for action. This shortcoming arises because the designs would be confined to organisational structures prevalent in recurring situations and potentially restricted by the design decided for the team. Such an approach could inhibit a system's inherent capacity for adaptation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信