两相流分裂预测的压力最小化方法

Ramin Dabirian, L. Thompson, R. Mohan, O. Shoham
{"title":"两相流分裂预测的压力最小化方法","authors":"Ramin Dabirian, L. Thompson, R. Mohan, O. Shoham","doi":"10.2118/166197-PA","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"was developed to predict the splitting phenomena under these regimes. Shoham extended his flow-splitting work to a horizontal reduced tee with a smaller-diameter branch arm (Shoham et al. 1989). Hong (1978) studied two-phase-flow splitting for a branching tee, considering the effect of side-arm angle and flow regimes on gas and liquid splitting. Hong and Griston (1995) studied flow splitting of an air/water system and concluded that, as the air split ratio increased to greater than 2:1, the experimental data points deviated from a 50:50 split. Hong and Griston (1995) also studied the effects of some devices on flow splitting. They recommended that nozzles be inserted directly downstream of an impacting tee to increase the chance of equal splitting. Azzopardi et al. (1987) considered the effects of annular flow for splitting at the tee junction. Azzopardi et al. (1988) investigated the effect of churn flow in the tee junctions. The experimental results for churn flow were the same as those for annular flow; therefore, they concluded that the inletgasand liquid-flow rates do not affect flow splitting. Peake (1992) concluded theoretically that uneven two-phase-flow splitting occurs as a result of unequal vapor-flow splitting. Tshuva et al. (1999) studied two-phase-flow splitting in horizontal and inclined parallel pipes. Taitel et al. (2003) studied the splitting of gas and liquid for four parallel pipes with a common inlet and outlet manifold capable of inclining from 0 to 15°. For the horizontal case, they observed identical splitting for each looped pipe, while for the other inclination angles, they observed a stagnant flow in at least one pipe. Pustylnik et al. (2006) investigated flow splitting in the lines on the basis of stability analysis, and proposed a model that was able to predict the number of pipes filled with stagnant liquid. One of the more-recent investigations on flow splitting was conducted by Alvarez et al. (2010). Their study investigated two-phase-flow splitting for looped lines such as parallel and looped configurations, and they developed a mechanistic model capable of predicting split ratio and pressure drop across each looped line on the basis of equal gas/liquid ratio in each branch. The purpose of our study is to discover the manner in which two phases of gas and liquid are split on the basis of the minimum pressure drop.","PeriodicalId":19446,"journal":{"name":"Oil and gas facilities","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pressure-Minimization Method for Prediction of Two-Phase-Flow Splitting\",\"authors\":\"Ramin Dabirian, L. Thompson, R. Mohan, O. Shoham\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/166197-PA\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"was developed to predict the splitting phenomena under these regimes. Shoham extended his flow-splitting work to a horizontal reduced tee with a smaller-diameter branch arm (Shoham et al. 1989). Hong (1978) studied two-phase-flow splitting for a branching tee, considering the effect of side-arm angle and flow regimes on gas and liquid splitting. Hong and Griston (1995) studied flow splitting of an air/water system and concluded that, as the air split ratio increased to greater than 2:1, the experimental data points deviated from a 50:50 split. Hong and Griston (1995) also studied the effects of some devices on flow splitting. They recommended that nozzles be inserted directly downstream of an impacting tee to increase the chance of equal splitting. Azzopardi et al. (1987) considered the effects of annular flow for splitting at the tee junction. Azzopardi et al. (1988) investigated the effect of churn flow in the tee junctions. The experimental results for churn flow were the same as those for annular flow; therefore, they concluded that the inletgasand liquid-flow rates do not affect flow splitting. Peake (1992) concluded theoretically that uneven two-phase-flow splitting occurs as a result of unequal vapor-flow splitting. Tshuva et al. (1999) studied two-phase-flow splitting in horizontal and inclined parallel pipes. Taitel et al. (2003) studied the splitting of gas and liquid for four parallel pipes with a common inlet and outlet manifold capable of inclining from 0 to 15°. For the horizontal case, they observed identical splitting for each looped pipe, while for the other inclination angles, they observed a stagnant flow in at least one pipe. Pustylnik et al. (2006) investigated flow splitting in the lines on the basis of stability analysis, and proposed a model that was able to predict the number of pipes filled with stagnant liquid. One of the more-recent investigations on flow splitting was conducted by Alvarez et al. (2010). Their study investigated two-phase-flow splitting for looped lines such as parallel and looped configurations, and they developed a mechanistic model capable of predicting split ratio and pressure drop across each looped line on the basis of equal gas/liquid ratio in each branch. The purpose of our study is to discover the manner in which two phases of gas and liquid are split on the basis of the minimum pressure drop.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19446,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oil and gas facilities\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oil and gas facilities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/166197-PA\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oil and gas facilities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/166197-PA","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

是用来预测这些制度下的分裂现象的。Shoham将他的分流工作扩展到具有较小直径分支臂的水平缩小三通(Shoham et al. 1989)。Hong(1978)研究了分支三通的两相流分裂,考虑了侧臂角和流动形式对气液分裂的影响。Hong和Griston(1995)研究了空气/水系统的流动分裂,并得出结论,当空气分裂比大于2:1时,实验数据点偏离了50:50的分裂。Hong和Griston(1995)也研究了一些装置对流动分裂的影响。他们建议将喷嘴直接插入冲击三通的下游,以增加均匀劈裂的机会。Azzopardi等人(1987)考虑了环流对三通处劈裂的影响。Azzopardi等人(1988)研究了三通管内搅拌流的影响。搅拌流的实验结果与环空流的实验结果一致;因此,他们得出结论,进口气体和液体流速不影响流动分裂。Peake(1992)从理论上得出结论,两相流分裂不均匀是气流分裂不均匀的结果。Tshuva等(1999)研究了两相流在水平和倾斜平行管道中的分裂。Taitel等人(2003)研究了四根平行管道的气液分离,该管道有一个共同的进出口歧管,可以从0°到15°倾斜。在水平的情况下,他们观察到每个环形管道都有相同的分裂,而在其他倾斜角度下,他们观察到至少一个管道中存在停滞流动。pustynik et al.(2006)在稳定性分析的基础上研究了管道中的流动分裂,并提出了一个能够预测充满滞流液体管道数量的模型。Alvarez等人(2010)进行了一项关于流动分裂的最新研究。他们的研究调查了两相流在环形管线上的分裂,例如平行和环形配置,并且他们开发了一个机制模型,能够在每个分支的气液比相等的基础上预测每个环形管线上的分裂比和压降。我们研究的目的是发现在最小压降的基础上分气液两相的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pressure-Minimization Method for Prediction of Two-Phase-Flow Splitting
was developed to predict the splitting phenomena under these regimes. Shoham extended his flow-splitting work to a horizontal reduced tee with a smaller-diameter branch arm (Shoham et al. 1989). Hong (1978) studied two-phase-flow splitting for a branching tee, considering the effect of side-arm angle and flow regimes on gas and liquid splitting. Hong and Griston (1995) studied flow splitting of an air/water system and concluded that, as the air split ratio increased to greater than 2:1, the experimental data points deviated from a 50:50 split. Hong and Griston (1995) also studied the effects of some devices on flow splitting. They recommended that nozzles be inserted directly downstream of an impacting tee to increase the chance of equal splitting. Azzopardi et al. (1987) considered the effects of annular flow for splitting at the tee junction. Azzopardi et al. (1988) investigated the effect of churn flow in the tee junctions. The experimental results for churn flow were the same as those for annular flow; therefore, they concluded that the inletgasand liquid-flow rates do not affect flow splitting. Peake (1992) concluded theoretically that uneven two-phase-flow splitting occurs as a result of unequal vapor-flow splitting. Tshuva et al. (1999) studied two-phase-flow splitting in horizontal and inclined parallel pipes. Taitel et al. (2003) studied the splitting of gas and liquid for four parallel pipes with a common inlet and outlet manifold capable of inclining from 0 to 15°. For the horizontal case, they observed identical splitting for each looped pipe, while for the other inclination angles, they observed a stagnant flow in at least one pipe. Pustylnik et al. (2006) investigated flow splitting in the lines on the basis of stability analysis, and proposed a model that was able to predict the number of pipes filled with stagnant liquid. One of the more-recent investigations on flow splitting was conducted by Alvarez et al. (2010). Their study investigated two-phase-flow splitting for looped lines such as parallel and looped configurations, and they developed a mechanistic model capable of predicting split ratio and pressure drop across each looped line on the basis of equal gas/liquid ratio in each branch. The purpose of our study is to discover the manner in which two phases of gas and liquid are split on the basis of the minimum pressure drop.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信