用KHI取代MEG用于缅甸海上海底管线的水合物控制

Jonghyun Kim, Paolo Scalea, Chulhwan Hwang, Jeong-Hoon Kim
{"title":"用KHI取代MEG用于缅甸海上海底管线的水合物控制","authors":"Jonghyun Kim, Paolo Scalea, Chulhwan Hwang, Jeong-Hoon Kim","doi":"10.2118/205764-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n This paper describes the successful replacement of Mono Ethylene Glycol (MEG) by Kinetic Hydrate Inhibitor (KHI) to guarantee flow assurance in the Shwe field subsea production system, offshore Myanmar. It covers the initial difficulties experienced with MEG, specific field conditions, the comprehensive KHI selection process and testing up to field application and operation.\n \n \n \n MEG used for hydrate inhibition in the field's subsea flowline was originally regenerated in the topside facility, however contamination of the MEG with salts from formation water was causing process upsets. The option of installing a reclamation package presented many challenges and, after review of field conditions, the application of a KHI was considered as a promising alternative to MEG. With the engagement of specialist chemical suppliers a broad and challenging series of laboratory, as well as field tests, was carried out to select a suitable product. Finally a dedicated permanent injection skid was installed to guarantee stable KHI delivery and production.\n \n \n \n The difficulties caused by salt contamination of the MEG system, combined with the intricate field logistics at the remote site offshore Myanmar, entailed a speedy solution. This combined with suitable operating parameters of the field; i.e. low water content, high wellhead flowing temperatures, subcooling within known KHI operating range, ensured KHI was an economical solution.\n Nevertheless from desktop study to successful field application a series hurdles had to be crossed, including performance and compatibility tests, simulating all the expected Shwe Offshore Platform (SHP) operating conditions: Determination of Hydrate Equilibrium Temperature (HET); Induction Time Autoclave test for the required residence time in the presence of Corrosion Inhibitor (CI); Hot Injection ests at wellhead operating temperature; Thermal stability tests for topsides and condensate disposal system; Umbilical material compatibility tests; Compatibility of KHI with incumbent products (MEG and CI).\n Testing of a range of products, carried out by specialist chemical supplier, resulted in the selection of a qualified product, followed by a successful field application testing programme.\n Seven years after its introduction, KHI has helped achieve optimum field uptime and reduced operational costs as well as eased logistics constraints.\n \n \n \n KHI is not new to the Oil & Gas industry, however information on its selection and application is not widely available. This paper sheds light on the steps to be considered when evaluating KHI as a suitable hydrate inhibitor, as well as the detailed laboratory tests for proper selection of a product. The intent is to help operators who are facing challenges with hydrate inhibition and could revert to KHI as an alternative.\n","PeriodicalId":11052,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Thu, October 14, 2021","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Replacement of MEG with KHI for Hydrate Control in Subsea Flowline Offshore Myanmar\",\"authors\":\"Jonghyun Kim, Paolo Scalea, Chulhwan Hwang, Jeong-Hoon Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/205764-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\n This paper describes the successful replacement of Mono Ethylene Glycol (MEG) by Kinetic Hydrate Inhibitor (KHI) to guarantee flow assurance in the Shwe field subsea production system, offshore Myanmar. It covers the initial difficulties experienced with MEG, specific field conditions, the comprehensive KHI selection process and testing up to field application and operation.\\n \\n \\n \\n MEG used for hydrate inhibition in the field's subsea flowline was originally regenerated in the topside facility, however contamination of the MEG with salts from formation water was causing process upsets. The option of installing a reclamation package presented many challenges and, after review of field conditions, the application of a KHI was considered as a promising alternative to MEG. With the engagement of specialist chemical suppliers a broad and challenging series of laboratory, as well as field tests, was carried out to select a suitable product. Finally a dedicated permanent injection skid was installed to guarantee stable KHI delivery and production.\\n \\n \\n \\n The difficulties caused by salt contamination of the MEG system, combined with the intricate field logistics at the remote site offshore Myanmar, entailed a speedy solution. This combined with suitable operating parameters of the field; i.e. low water content, high wellhead flowing temperatures, subcooling within known KHI operating range, ensured KHI was an economical solution.\\n Nevertheless from desktop study to successful field application a series hurdles had to be crossed, including performance and compatibility tests, simulating all the expected Shwe Offshore Platform (SHP) operating conditions: Determination of Hydrate Equilibrium Temperature (HET); Induction Time Autoclave test for the required residence time in the presence of Corrosion Inhibitor (CI); Hot Injection ests at wellhead operating temperature; Thermal stability tests for topsides and condensate disposal system; Umbilical material compatibility tests; Compatibility of KHI with incumbent products (MEG and CI).\\n Testing of a range of products, carried out by specialist chemical supplier, resulted in the selection of a qualified product, followed by a successful field application testing programme.\\n Seven years after its introduction, KHI has helped achieve optimum field uptime and reduced operational costs as well as eased logistics constraints.\\n \\n \\n \\n KHI is not new to the Oil & Gas industry, however information on its selection and application is not widely available. This paper sheds light on the steps to be considered when evaluating KHI as a suitable hydrate inhibitor, as well as the detailed laboratory tests for proper selection of a product. The intent is to help operators who are facing challenges with hydrate inhibition and could revert to KHI as an alternative.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":11052,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 3 Thu, October 14, 2021\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 3 Thu, October 14, 2021\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/205764-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Thu, October 14, 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/205764-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文介绍了缅甸近海Shwe油田海底生产系统中,动能水合物抑制剂(KHI)成功替代单乙二醇(MEG),以保证流动安全。它涵盖了MEG最初遇到的困难,具体的现场条件,全面的KHI选择过程和测试,直至现场应用和操作。MEG用于油田海底管线的水合物抑制,最初是在上层设施中再生的,但是地层水中的盐污染了MEG,导致了过程中断。安装回填包的选择存在许多挑战,在审查了现场条件后,KHI的应用被认为是MEG的一个有希望的替代方案。在专业化学品供应商的参与下,进行了一系列广泛而具有挑战性的实验室和实地测试,以选择合适的产品。最后,安装了专用的永久注射撬,以保证KHI的稳定输送和生产。由于MEG系统的盐污染造成的困难,再加上缅甸海上偏远地区复杂的现场后勤,需要迅速解决。这与合适的现场操作参数相结合;即低含水量,高井口流动温度,在已知的KHI操作范围内过冷,确保了KHI是经济的解决方案。然而,从桌面研究到成功的现场应用,必须克服一系列障碍,包括性能和兼容性测试,模拟所有预期的Shwe海上平台(SHP)操作条件:水合物平衡温度(HET)的确定;感应时间高压釜测试在缓蚀剂(CI)存在下所需的停留时间;井口工作温度下的热注入试验;上层甲板和冷凝水处理系统的热稳定性测试;脐带材料相容性试验;KHI与现有产品(MEG和CI)的兼容性。由专业化学品供应商对一系列产品进行测试,最终选择了合格的产品,随后进行了成功的现场应用测试计划。在引进KHI七年后,KHI帮助实现了最佳的现场正常运行时间,降低了运营成本,缓解了物流限制。KHI对于油气行业来说并不新鲜,但是关于它的选择和应用的信息并不广泛。本文阐明了在评价KHI作为合适的水合物抑制剂时应考虑的步骤,以及为适当选择产品而进行的详细实验室测试。其目的是帮助面临水合物抑制挑战的作业者,并将KHI作为替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Replacement of MEG with KHI for Hydrate Control in Subsea Flowline Offshore Myanmar
This paper describes the successful replacement of Mono Ethylene Glycol (MEG) by Kinetic Hydrate Inhibitor (KHI) to guarantee flow assurance in the Shwe field subsea production system, offshore Myanmar. It covers the initial difficulties experienced with MEG, specific field conditions, the comprehensive KHI selection process and testing up to field application and operation. MEG used for hydrate inhibition in the field's subsea flowline was originally regenerated in the topside facility, however contamination of the MEG with salts from formation water was causing process upsets. The option of installing a reclamation package presented many challenges and, after review of field conditions, the application of a KHI was considered as a promising alternative to MEG. With the engagement of specialist chemical suppliers a broad and challenging series of laboratory, as well as field tests, was carried out to select a suitable product. Finally a dedicated permanent injection skid was installed to guarantee stable KHI delivery and production. The difficulties caused by salt contamination of the MEG system, combined with the intricate field logistics at the remote site offshore Myanmar, entailed a speedy solution. This combined with suitable operating parameters of the field; i.e. low water content, high wellhead flowing temperatures, subcooling within known KHI operating range, ensured KHI was an economical solution. Nevertheless from desktop study to successful field application a series hurdles had to be crossed, including performance and compatibility tests, simulating all the expected Shwe Offshore Platform (SHP) operating conditions: Determination of Hydrate Equilibrium Temperature (HET); Induction Time Autoclave test for the required residence time in the presence of Corrosion Inhibitor (CI); Hot Injection ests at wellhead operating temperature; Thermal stability tests for topsides and condensate disposal system; Umbilical material compatibility tests; Compatibility of KHI with incumbent products (MEG and CI). Testing of a range of products, carried out by specialist chemical supplier, resulted in the selection of a qualified product, followed by a successful field application testing programme. Seven years after its introduction, KHI has helped achieve optimum field uptime and reduced operational costs as well as eased logistics constraints. KHI is not new to the Oil & Gas industry, however information on its selection and application is not widely available. This paper sheds light on the steps to be considered when evaluating KHI as a suitable hydrate inhibitor, as well as the detailed laboratory tests for proper selection of a product. The intent is to help operators who are facing challenges with hydrate inhibition and could revert to KHI as an alternative.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信