基于线性模型的金鸡纳叶面积和叶重无损估计

IF 1.8 Q2 FORESTRY
A. E. Huaccha-Castillo, F. H. Fernandez-Zarate, Luis Jhoseph Pérez-Delgado, Karla Saith Tantalean-Osores, Segundo Primitivo Vaca-Marquina, Tito Sanchez-Santillán, Eli Morales-Rojas, Alejandro Seminario-Cunya, L. Quiñones-Huatangari
{"title":"基于线性模型的金鸡纳叶面积和叶重无损估计","authors":"A. E. Huaccha-Castillo, F. H. Fernandez-Zarate, Luis Jhoseph Pérez-Delgado, Karla Saith Tantalean-Osores, Segundo Primitivo Vaca-Marquina, Tito Sanchez-Santillán, Eli Morales-Rojas, Alejandro Seminario-Cunya, L. Quiñones-Huatangari","doi":"10.1080/21580103.2023.2170473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Non-destructive methods that accurately estimate leaf area (LA) and leaf weight (LW) are simple and inexpensive, and represent powerful tools in the development of physiological and agronomic research. The objective of this research is to generate mathematical models for estimating the LA and LW of Cinchona officinalis leaves. A total of 220 leaves were collected from C. officinalis plants 10 months after transplantation. Each leaf was measured for length, width, weight, and leaf area. Data for 80% of leaves were used to form the training set, and data for the remaining 20% were used as the validation set. The training set was used for model fit and choice, whereas the validation set al.lowed assessment of the of the model’s predictive ability. The LA and LW were modeled using seven linear regression models based on the length (L) and width (Wi) of leaves. In addition, the models were assessed based on calculation of the following statistics: goodness of fit (R 2), root mean squared error (RMSE), Akaike’s information criterion (AIC), and the deviation between the regression line of the observed versus expected values and the reference line, determined by the area between these lines (ABL). For LA estimation, the model LA = 11.521(Wi) − 21.422 (R 2 = 0.96, RMSE = 28.16, AIC = 3.48, and ABL = 140.34) was chosen, while for LW determination, LW = 0.2419(Wi) − 0.4936 (R 2 = 0.93, RMSE = 0.56, AIC = 37.36, and ABL = 0.03) was selected. Finally, the LA and LW of C. officinalis could be estimated through linear regression involving leaf width, proving to be a simple and accurate tool.","PeriodicalId":51802,"journal":{"name":"Forest Science and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Non-destructive estimation of leaf area and leaf weight of Cinchona officinalis L. (Rubiaceae) based on linear models\",\"authors\":\"A. E. Huaccha-Castillo, F. H. Fernandez-Zarate, Luis Jhoseph Pérez-Delgado, Karla Saith Tantalean-Osores, Segundo Primitivo Vaca-Marquina, Tito Sanchez-Santillán, Eli Morales-Rojas, Alejandro Seminario-Cunya, L. Quiñones-Huatangari\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21580103.2023.2170473\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Non-destructive methods that accurately estimate leaf area (LA) and leaf weight (LW) are simple and inexpensive, and represent powerful tools in the development of physiological and agronomic research. The objective of this research is to generate mathematical models for estimating the LA and LW of Cinchona officinalis leaves. A total of 220 leaves were collected from C. officinalis plants 10 months after transplantation. Each leaf was measured for length, width, weight, and leaf area. Data for 80% of leaves were used to form the training set, and data for the remaining 20% were used as the validation set. The training set was used for model fit and choice, whereas the validation set al.lowed assessment of the of the model’s predictive ability. The LA and LW were modeled using seven linear regression models based on the length (L) and width (Wi) of leaves. In addition, the models were assessed based on calculation of the following statistics: goodness of fit (R 2), root mean squared error (RMSE), Akaike’s information criterion (AIC), and the deviation between the regression line of the observed versus expected values and the reference line, determined by the area between these lines (ABL). For LA estimation, the model LA = 11.521(Wi) − 21.422 (R 2 = 0.96, RMSE = 28.16, AIC = 3.48, and ABL = 140.34) was chosen, while for LW determination, LW = 0.2419(Wi) − 0.4936 (R 2 = 0.93, RMSE = 0.56, AIC = 37.36, and ABL = 0.03) was selected. Finally, the LA and LW of C. officinalis could be estimated through linear regression involving leaf width, proving to be a simple and accurate tool.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51802,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forest Science and Technology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forest Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1087\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21580103.2023.2170473\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FORESTRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21580103.2023.2170473","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

准确估算叶片面积(LA)和叶片重(LW)的无损方法简单、经济,是生理和农艺研究的有力工具。本研究的目的是建立估算金鸡纳叶的LA和LW的数学模型。在移植10个月后,共收集了220片officinalis植株的叶片。测量每片叶子的长度、宽度、重量和叶面积。80%的叶子数据组成训练集,剩余20%的叶子数据作为验证集。训练集用于模型拟合和选择,而验证集用于评估模型的预测能力。采用基于叶片长度(L)和宽度(Wi)的7个线性回归模型对叶片的叶片生长和叶片生长进行了建模。此外,根据以下统计量的计算对模型进行评估:拟合优度(r2),均方根误差(RMSE),赤池信息准则(AIC)以及观测值与期望值的回归线与参考线之间的偏差,由这些线之间的面积(ABL)决定。对于LA估计,选择LA = 11.521(Wi)−21.422 (r2 = 0.96, RMSE = 28.16, AIC = 3.48, ABL = 140.34)模型;对于LW确定,选择LW = 0.2419(Wi)−0.4936 (r2 = 0.93, RMSE = 0.56, AIC = 37.36, ABL = 0.03)模型。最后,通过考虑叶宽的线性回归可以估算出山茱萸的叶重和叶重,是一种简单、准确的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Non-destructive estimation of leaf area and leaf weight of Cinchona officinalis L. (Rubiaceae) based on linear models
Abstract Non-destructive methods that accurately estimate leaf area (LA) and leaf weight (LW) are simple and inexpensive, and represent powerful tools in the development of physiological and agronomic research. The objective of this research is to generate mathematical models for estimating the LA and LW of Cinchona officinalis leaves. A total of 220 leaves were collected from C. officinalis plants 10 months after transplantation. Each leaf was measured for length, width, weight, and leaf area. Data for 80% of leaves were used to form the training set, and data for the remaining 20% were used as the validation set. The training set was used for model fit and choice, whereas the validation set al.lowed assessment of the of the model’s predictive ability. The LA and LW were modeled using seven linear regression models based on the length (L) and width (Wi) of leaves. In addition, the models were assessed based on calculation of the following statistics: goodness of fit (R 2), root mean squared error (RMSE), Akaike’s information criterion (AIC), and the deviation between the regression line of the observed versus expected values and the reference line, determined by the area between these lines (ABL). For LA estimation, the model LA = 11.521(Wi) − 21.422 (R 2 = 0.96, RMSE = 28.16, AIC = 3.48, and ABL = 140.34) was chosen, while for LW determination, LW = 0.2419(Wi) − 0.4936 (R 2 = 0.93, RMSE = 0.56, AIC = 37.36, and ABL = 0.03) was selected. Finally, the LA and LW of C. officinalis could be estimated through linear regression involving leaf width, proving to be a simple and accurate tool.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
21 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信