双重自我结构在决定支付卡选择中的作用:与信用卡借款人合作的见解

Q4 Social Sciences
Laura C. Ricaldi, Sandra J. Huston
{"title":"双重自我结构在决定支付卡选择中的作用:与信用卡借款人合作的见解","authors":"Laura C. Ricaldi, Sandra J. Huston","doi":"10.4148/1944-9771.1177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Evidence has shown that consumers are better off using credit cards rather than debit cards as a payment choice (King & King, 2005). This assumes that credit card payers are “convenience users” and do not carry a balance. However, there are habitual credit card borrowers (“revolving users”), as well as those that elect to use debit cards, even though the costs outweigh the benefits. By examining the determinants of payment choice, with a specific focus on dual-self constructs (attitudes, myopia, and financial sophistication), results from this study can provide insight for financial professionals to help mitigate the incidence of revolving credit card users. Using data from Survey of Consumer Finances (SCF) collected between 1998 and 2013, results indicated that while myopia does not explain variation between revolving credit and debit card users, differences in attitudes exist. All dual-self constructs discriminated between revolving and convenience credit card users, with attitudes having the greatest effect. Combining results from these payment choice profile comparisons suggested that financial professionals may find value in initially encouraging revolving credit card users to be debit card users, while working to change credit attitudes, with the goal of transitioning these former revolvers to convenience credit card users.","PeriodicalId":37600,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Financial Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Role of Dual-Self Constructs in Determining Payment Card Choice: Insights for Working with Credit Card Borrowers\",\"authors\":\"Laura C. Ricaldi, Sandra J. Huston\",\"doi\":\"10.4148/1944-9771.1177\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Evidence has shown that consumers are better off using credit cards rather than debit cards as a payment choice (King & King, 2005). This assumes that credit card payers are “convenience users” and do not carry a balance. However, there are habitual credit card borrowers (“revolving users”), as well as those that elect to use debit cards, even though the costs outweigh the benefits. By examining the determinants of payment choice, with a specific focus on dual-self constructs (attitudes, myopia, and financial sophistication), results from this study can provide insight for financial professionals to help mitigate the incidence of revolving credit card users. Using data from Survey of Consumer Finances (SCF) collected between 1998 and 2013, results indicated that while myopia does not explain variation between revolving credit and debit card users, differences in attitudes exist. All dual-self constructs discriminated between revolving and convenience credit card users, with attitudes having the greatest effect. Combining results from these payment choice profile comparisons suggested that financial professionals may find value in initially encouraging revolving credit card users to be debit card users, while working to change credit attitudes, with the goal of transitioning these former revolvers to convenience credit card users.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37600,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Financial Therapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Financial Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4148/1944-9771.1177\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Financial Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4148/1944-9771.1177","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

有证据表明,消费者最好使用信用卡而不是借记卡作为支付选择(King & King, 2005)。这假设信用卡支付者是“方便用户”,没有余额。然而,有习惯性的信用卡借款人(“循环用户”),以及那些选择使用借记卡的人,即使成本大于收益。通过研究支付选择的决定因素,特别关注双重自我结构(态度、短视和金融成熟度),本研究的结果可以为金融专业人士提供见解,以帮助减少循环信用卡用户的发生率。利用1998年至2013年收集的消费者财务调查(SCF)数据,结果表明,虽然近视不能解释循环信用卡和借记卡用户之间的差异,但态度存在差异。所有的双重自我构念都对循环信用卡使用者和便利信用卡使用者进行了区分,其中态度的影响最大。综合这些支付选择概况比较的结果表明,金融专业人士可能会发现,最初鼓励循环信用卡用户成为借记卡用户是有价值的,同时努力改变信贷态度,目标是将这些以前的左轮信用卡用户转变为便利的信用卡用户。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Role of Dual-Self Constructs in Determining Payment Card Choice: Insights for Working with Credit Card Borrowers
Evidence has shown that consumers are better off using credit cards rather than debit cards as a payment choice (King & King, 2005). This assumes that credit card payers are “convenience users” and do not carry a balance. However, there are habitual credit card borrowers (“revolving users”), as well as those that elect to use debit cards, even though the costs outweigh the benefits. By examining the determinants of payment choice, with a specific focus on dual-self constructs (attitudes, myopia, and financial sophistication), results from this study can provide insight for financial professionals to help mitigate the incidence of revolving credit card users. Using data from Survey of Consumer Finances (SCF) collected between 1998 and 2013, results indicated that while myopia does not explain variation between revolving credit and debit card users, differences in attitudes exist. All dual-self constructs discriminated between revolving and convenience credit card users, with attitudes having the greatest effect. Combining results from these payment choice profile comparisons suggested that financial professionals may find value in initially encouraging revolving credit card users to be debit card users, while working to change credit attitudes, with the goal of transitioning these former revolvers to convenience credit card users.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Financial Therapy
Journal of Financial Therapy Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Finance
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: All manuscripts received are blind peer reviewed. Because of the clinical focus of the journal, authors are encouraged to address the conceptual methodology underlying the research and to describe the intervention methods employed. Although detailed reviews of literature are accepted, reviewers tend to appreciate manuscripts with a very strong introduction describing the purpose of the study, a well described conceptual framework, concise presentation of findings, and a thorough discussion of results that are applicable to practicing financial therapists, financial counselors, psychologists, marriage and family therapists, and others who regularly work in clinical settings. Topics of interest to readers and reviewers include: *Pre- and post-test analyses of counseling and financial therapy methods *Tests showing the effectiveness of financial education in changing both attitudes and behaviors *Financial therapy trends *Regulation of financial therapy *Ethical issues associated with financial therapy *Practice management techniques *Client assessment and management procedures *Employee counseling and therapy *Financial therapy research methodological and statistical procedures *Book reviews and letters The Journal of Financial Therapy is sponsored by the Financial Therapy Association and currently housed within the Institute of Personal Financial Planning at Kansas State University. The Journal provides a forum for those who are interested in financial therapy with a forum for sharing models, theory, ideas, strategies, and therapy approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信