{"title":"传统心理声学评价工具、方法和算法的综述","authors":"Alexander Stojanow, Judith Liebetrau","doi":"10.1109/QoMEX.2016.7498923","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nowadays, psychoacoustic analysis of a sound is often applied for quick quantification of its auditory perception. Such hearing-related quantities also referred to as psychoacoustic parameters are meant to be a good representation of the human auditory perception. Predictive models are available to estimate the perception of these quantities. However, calculated psychoacoustic parameters show a lack of accuracy when compared with subjective listening test results for complex and authentic sounds. This paper shows some deficiencies and strengths of conventional algorithms and offers a few ideas for improvement.","PeriodicalId":6645,"journal":{"name":"2016 Eighth International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX)","volume":"172 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A review on conventional psychoacoustic evaluation tools, methods and algorithms\",\"authors\":\"Alexander Stojanow, Judith Liebetrau\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/QoMEX.2016.7498923\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Nowadays, psychoacoustic analysis of a sound is often applied for quick quantification of its auditory perception. Such hearing-related quantities also referred to as psychoacoustic parameters are meant to be a good representation of the human auditory perception. Predictive models are available to estimate the perception of these quantities. However, calculated psychoacoustic parameters show a lack of accuracy when compared with subjective listening test results for complex and authentic sounds. This paper shows some deficiencies and strengths of conventional algorithms and offers a few ideas for improvement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6645,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 Eighth International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX)\",\"volume\":\"172 1\",\"pages\":\"1-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 Eighth International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/QoMEX.2016.7498923\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 Eighth International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/QoMEX.2016.7498923","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A review on conventional psychoacoustic evaluation tools, methods and algorithms
Nowadays, psychoacoustic analysis of a sound is often applied for quick quantification of its auditory perception. Such hearing-related quantities also referred to as psychoacoustic parameters are meant to be a good representation of the human auditory perception. Predictive models are available to estimate the perception of these quantities. However, calculated psychoacoustic parameters show a lack of accuracy when compared with subjective listening test results for complex and authentic sounds. This paper shows some deficiencies and strengths of conventional algorithms and offers a few ideas for improvement.