E. Rahiala, S. Tenhola, E. Vanninen, E. Herrgård, T. Tikanoja, A. Martikainen
{"title":"12岁小于胎龄儿童的动态血压","authors":"E. Rahiala, S. Tenhola, E. Vanninen, E. Herrgård, T. Tikanoja, A. Martikainen","doi":"10.1161/01.HYP.0000013864.24138.A5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An association between low birth weight and subsequent elevated blood pressure has been demonstrated in a large number of studies, but the number of subjects born small for gestational age in these studies has been negligible. The inverse relationship between birth weight and blood pressure in children has been evaluated previously with an ambulatory blood pressure device, but only in children with normal birth weights. In this prospective case-control study from birth to the age of 12, we evaluated the ambulatory blood pressures in 50 children born at term but small for gestational age and in 50 full-term children born appropriate for gestational age. Children born small for gestational age had similar mean±SD systolic (117.5±8.5 mm Hg versus 115.3±7.4 mm Hg, P =0.221), and diastolic (69.2±5.3 mm Hg versus 67.3±4.4 mm Hg, P =0.075) 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure compared with the values of the children born appropriate for gestational age. However, 24-hour systolic blood pressure in the small-for-gestational-age children was higher (3.90 mm Hg; 95% confidence interval, 0.65 to 7.15) after adjusting for current body mass index. The difference in current body mass index was the only determinant for the difference in systolic blood pressure between the groups. Birth weight had no direct association with the blood pressure values. Impaired fetal growth may have a relationship with higher later blood pressure, but in 12-year-old children, blood pressure differences between small for gestational age and appropriate for gestational age children are much more dependent on current body size.","PeriodicalId":13233,"journal":{"name":"Hypertension: Journal of the American Heart Association","volume":"29 1","pages":"909-913"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"33","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ambulatory Blood Pressure in 12-Year-Old Children Born Small for Gestational Age\",\"authors\":\"E. Rahiala, S. Tenhola, E. Vanninen, E. Herrgård, T. Tikanoja, A. Martikainen\",\"doi\":\"10.1161/01.HYP.0000013864.24138.A5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"An association between low birth weight and subsequent elevated blood pressure has been demonstrated in a large number of studies, but the number of subjects born small for gestational age in these studies has been negligible. The inverse relationship between birth weight and blood pressure in children has been evaluated previously with an ambulatory blood pressure device, but only in children with normal birth weights. In this prospective case-control study from birth to the age of 12, we evaluated the ambulatory blood pressures in 50 children born at term but small for gestational age and in 50 full-term children born appropriate for gestational age. Children born small for gestational age had similar mean±SD systolic (117.5±8.5 mm Hg versus 115.3±7.4 mm Hg, P =0.221), and diastolic (69.2±5.3 mm Hg versus 67.3±4.4 mm Hg, P =0.075) 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure compared with the values of the children born appropriate for gestational age. However, 24-hour systolic blood pressure in the small-for-gestational-age children was higher (3.90 mm Hg; 95% confidence interval, 0.65 to 7.15) after adjusting for current body mass index. The difference in current body mass index was the only determinant for the difference in systolic blood pressure between the groups. Birth weight had no direct association with the blood pressure values. Impaired fetal growth may have a relationship with higher later blood pressure, but in 12-year-old children, blood pressure differences between small for gestational age and appropriate for gestational age children are much more dependent on current body size.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13233,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hypertension: Journal of the American Heart Association\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"909-913\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"33\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hypertension: Journal of the American Heart Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1161/01.HYP.0000013864.24138.A5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hypertension: Journal of the American Heart Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/01.HYP.0000013864.24138.A5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 33
摘要
大量的研究已经证实了低出生体重和随后的血压升高之间的联系,但这些研究中出生时小于胎龄的受试者数量可以忽略不计。儿童出生体重和血压之间的负相关关系先前已通过动态血压装置进行了评估,但仅适用于正常出生体重的儿童。在这项从出生到12岁的前瞻性病例对照研究中,我们评估了50名足月出生但小于胎龄的儿童和50名足月出生但符合胎龄的儿童的动态血压。小于胎龄出生儿童的24小时动态血压平均值±SD(收缩压117.5±8.5 mm Hg vs 115.3±7.4 mm Hg, P =0.221)和舒张压(69.2±5.3 mm Hg vs 67.3±4.4 mm Hg, P =0.075)与适龄出生儿童相似。然而,小胎龄儿童的24小时收缩压较高(3.90 mm Hg;95%置信区间,0.65 - 7.15)。当前体重指数的差异是两组之间收缩压差异的唯一决定因素。出生体重与血压值没有直接关系。胎儿生长受损可能与后期较高的血压有关,但在12岁儿童中,胎龄小和胎龄适宜儿童之间的血压差异更多地取决于当前的体型。
Ambulatory Blood Pressure in 12-Year-Old Children Born Small for Gestational Age
An association between low birth weight and subsequent elevated blood pressure has been demonstrated in a large number of studies, but the number of subjects born small for gestational age in these studies has been negligible. The inverse relationship between birth weight and blood pressure in children has been evaluated previously with an ambulatory blood pressure device, but only in children with normal birth weights. In this prospective case-control study from birth to the age of 12, we evaluated the ambulatory blood pressures in 50 children born at term but small for gestational age and in 50 full-term children born appropriate for gestational age. Children born small for gestational age had similar mean±SD systolic (117.5±8.5 mm Hg versus 115.3±7.4 mm Hg, P =0.221), and diastolic (69.2±5.3 mm Hg versus 67.3±4.4 mm Hg, P =0.075) 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure compared with the values of the children born appropriate for gestational age. However, 24-hour systolic blood pressure in the small-for-gestational-age children was higher (3.90 mm Hg; 95% confidence interval, 0.65 to 7.15) after adjusting for current body mass index. The difference in current body mass index was the only determinant for the difference in systolic blood pressure between the groups. Birth weight had no direct association with the blood pressure values. Impaired fetal growth may have a relationship with higher later blood pressure, but in 12-year-old children, blood pressure differences between small for gestational age and appropriate for gestational age children are much more dependent on current body size.