变形钢筋和普通钢筋对轻加筋边界单元性能的影响

Q3 Engineering
M. Pourakbar, S. Tariverdilo
{"title":"变形钢筋和普通钢筋对轻加筋边界单元性能的影响","authors":"M. Pourakbar, S. Tariverdilo","doi":"10.22075/JRCE.2020.19767.1381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Failure modes in recent earthquakes on lightly reinforced shear walls includes rebar fracture and out of plane buckling of its boundary elements. In latest edition of ACI 318 and also latest amendment of NZS 3101-2006 to avoid rebar fracture in boundary elements, the minimum reinforcement ratio for shear walls is increased. This experimental study investigates that rather than increasing reinforcement ratio, is it possible to avoid rebar fracture by use of plain rebars in boundary elements of lightly reinforced shear walls. Experimental program includes specimens with plain and deformed rebars tested under monotonic and cyclic loading. Strain profile of the rebars are evaluated employing correlation between hardness and residual strain. Results indicate that failure of specimens with plain rebars occurs on single crack, however they have more uniform strain profile. On the other hand, in the specimens with plain and deformed rebars, out of plane buckling occurs at same crack width, but at different elongations. It is shown that local strain demand (crack width) has better correlation with out of plane buckling in comparison with average axial strain.","PeriodicalId":52415,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rehabilitation in Civil Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Deformed and Plain Rebars on the Behavior of Lightly Reinforced Boundary Elements\",\"authors\":\"M. Pourakbar, S. Tariverdilo\",\"doi\":\"10.22075/JRCE.2020.19767.1381\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Failure modes in recent earthquakes on lightly reinforced shear walls includes rebar fracture and out of plane buckling of its boundary elements. In latest edition of ACI 318 and also latest amendment of NZS 3101-2006 to avoid rebar fracture in boundary elements, the minimum reinforcement ratio for shear walls is increased. This experimental study investigates that rather than increasing reinforcement ratio, is it possible to avoid rebar fracture by use of plain rebars in boundary elements of lightly reinforced shear walls. Experimental program includes specimens with plain and deformed rebars tested under monotonic and cyclic loading. Strain profile of the rebars are evaluated employing correlation between hardness and residual strain. Results indicate that failure of specimens with plain rebars occurs on single crack, however they have more uniform strain profile. On the other hand, in the specimens with plain and deformed rebars, out of plane buckling occurs at same crack width, but at different elongations. It is shown that local strain demand (crack width) has better correlation with out of plane buckling in comparison with average axial strain.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52415,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Rehabilitation in Civil Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Rehabilitation in Civil Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22075/JRCE.2020.19767.1381\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rehabilitation in Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22075/JRCE.2020.19767.1381","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来轻配筋剪力墙地震破坏模式主要包括钢筋断裂和边界单元的面外屈曲。在最新版的ACI 318和最新修订的NZS 3101-2006中,为了避免边界单元的钢筋断裂,增加了剪力墙的最小配筋率。本试验研究了在轻配筋剪力墙边界单元中使用素筋是否可以避免钢筋断裂,而不是增加配筋率。试验程序包括普通和变形钢筋试件在单调和循环荷载下的试验。采用硬度与残余应变的相关性来评价钢筋的应变分布。结果表明:普通钢筋试件的破坏发生在单裂纹上,但其应变分布更为均匀;另一方面,在普通钢筋和变形钢筋试件中,在相同的裂缝宽度下发生面外屈曲,但在不同的伸长处。结果表明,与平均轴向应变相比,局部应变需求(裂纹宽度)与面外屈曲具有更好的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of Deformed and Plain Rebars on the Behavior of Lightly Reinforced Boundary Elements
Failure modes in recent earthquakes on lightly reinforced shear walls includes rebar fracture and out of plane buckling of its boundary elements. In latest edition of ACI 318 and also latest amendment of NZS 3101-2006 to avoid rebar fracture in boundary elements, the minimum reinforcement ratio for shear walls is increased. This experimental study investigates that rather than increasing reinforcement ratio, is it possible to avoid rebar fracture by use of plain rebars in boundary elements of lightly reinforced shear walls. Experimental program includes specimens with plain and deformed rebars tested under monotonic and cyclic loading. Strain profile of the rebars are evaluated employing correlation between hardness and residual strain. Results indicate that failure of specimens with plain rebars occurs on single crack, however they have more uniform strain profile. On the other hand, in the specimens with plain and deformed rebars, out of plane buckling occurs at same crack width, but at different elongations. It is shown that local strain demand (crack width) has better correlation with out of plane buckling in comparison with average axial strain.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Rehabilitation in Civil Engineering
Journal of Rehabilitation in Civil Engineering Engineering-Building and Construction
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信