从波尔克街到破碎的地球;或者,文学自然主义的地理学启示

4区 社会学 Q2 Arts and Humanities
C. Robinson
{"title":"从波尔克街到破碎的地球;或者,文学自然主义的地理学启示","authors":"C. Robinson","doi":"10.14321/crnewcentrevi.20.3.0047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IN HIS RECENT “RE-VISIONING AMERICAN LITERARY NATURALISM,” MARC Egnal identifies two problems in the study of American naturalism. First, naturalism scholars can be accused of a myopic preference for the canonical authors Frank Norris, Jack London, Theodore Dreiser, and Stephen Crane. Then, based on this myopia, naturalism enjoys an undeservedly “broad temporal reach” as latter-day authors like Hemingway, DeLillo, and McCarthy earn the naturalist title by stylistic resemblance to Norris and company. Egnal proposes to solve both problems by replacing the author myopia with a Darwinian one; only “works in which the ‘laws’ of heredity, or environment, or both strongly influenced how characters behaved” are","PeriodicalId":45935,"journal":{"name":"CR-THE NEW CENTENNIAL REVIEW","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Scale Shifts from Polk Street to a Broken Earth; or, Literary Naturalism's Geontological Affordances\",\"authors\":\"C. Robinson\",\"doi\":\"10.14321/crnewcentrevi.20.3.0047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"IN HIS RECENT “RE-VISIONING AMERICAN LITERARY NATURALISM,” MARC Egnal identifies two problems in the study of American naturalism. First, naturalism scholars can be accused of a myopic preference for the canonical authors Frank Norris, Jack London, Theodore Dreiser, and Stephen Crane. Then, based on this myopia, naturalism enjoys an undeservedly “broad temporal reach” as latter-day authors like Hemingway, DeLillo, and McCarthy earn the naturalist title by stylistic resemblance to Norris and company. Egnal proposes to solve both problems by replacing the author myopia with a Darwinian one; only “works in which the ‘laws’ of heredity, or environment, or both strongly influenced how characters behaved” are\",\"PeriodicalId\":45935,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CR-THE NEW CENTENNIAL REVIEW\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CR-THE NEW CENTENNIAL REVIEW\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14321/crnewcentrevi.20.3.0047\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CR-THE NEW CENTENNIAL REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14321/crnewcentrevi.20.3.0047","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在他最近的“重新审视美国文学自然主义”中,马克·埃格纳尔指出了美国自然主义研究中的两个问题。首先,自然主义学者可能会被指责对权威作家弗兰克·诺里斯、杰克·伦敦、西奥多·德莱塞和斯蒂芬·克兰的目光短浅。然后,基于这种短视,自然主义享有不应有的“广泛的时间范围”,就像海明威、德里罗和麦卡锡等当代作家因风格与诺里斯及其同伴相似而获得自然主义者的称号一样。埃格纳尔建议用达尔文的短视来代替作者的短视来解决这两个问题;只有“遗传或环境的‘法则’,或两者都对角色的行为产生强烈影响的作品”才是
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Scale Shifts from Polk Street to a Broken Earth; or, Literary Naturalism's Geontological Affordances
IN HIS RECENT “RE-VISIONING AMERICAN LITERARY NATURALISM,” MARC Egnal identifies two problems in the study of American naturalism. First, naturalism scholars can be accused of a myopic preference for the canonical authors Frank Norris, Jack London, Theodore Dreiser, and Stephen Crane. Then, based on this myopia, naturalism enjoys an undeservedly “broad temporal reach” as latter-day authors like Hemingway, DeLillo, and McCarthy earn the naturalist title by stylistic resemblance to Norris and company. Egnal proposes to solve both problems by replacing the author myopia with a Darwinian one; only “works in which the ‘laws’ of heredity, or environment, or both strongly influenced how characters behaved” are
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CR-THE NEW CENTENNIAL REVIEW
CR-THE NEW CENTENNIAL REVIEW HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The New Centennial Review is devoted to comparative studies of the Americas that suggest possibilities for a different future. Centennial Review is published three times a year under the editorship of Scott Michaelsen (Department of English, Michigan State University) and David E. Johnson (Department of Comparative Literature, SUNY at Buffalo). The journal recognizes that the language of the Americas is translation, and that questions of translation, dialogue, and border crossings (linguistic, cultural, national, and the like) are necessary for rethinking the foundations and limits of the Americas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信