通过监管技术(RegTech)预防洗钱的解决方案:来自伊斯兰和传统银行的证据

Alivia Meyrizka Utami, Mega Dwi Septivani
{"title":"通过监管技术(RegTech)预防洗钱的解决方案:来自伊斯兰和传统银行的证据","authors":"Alivia Meyrizka Utami, Mega Dwi Septivani","doi":"10.20885/jeki.vol8.iss1.art2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose – This study aims to examine the effect of the relationship between RegTech and Money Laundering Prevention (MLP). This study also examines the differences between RegTech in Islamic and conventional banks.Methodology – The current study used explanatory research to test hypotheses using primary data obtained through a survey with a questionnaire conducted online with 100 respondents from bank employees, both conventional and Islamic in Indonesia. In addition, an independent t-test was used.Findings – The results reveal that Transaction Monitoring (TM) and Cost and Time (CT) significantly affect MLP, while electronic Know Your Customer (eKYC) does not affect MLP. The comparative test of the differences in RegTech in Islamic and conventional banks confirm differences in transaction monitoring and cost efficiency between Islamic and conventional banks. At the same time, there is no difference in eKYC between Islamic and conventional banks.Originality – Research related to RegTech in Islamic and conventional banks' money laundering prevention efforts is still very limited in Indonesia. This study will contribute to the existing literature on Islamic finance and the development of financial technology in Indonesia.","PeriodicalId":34834,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Ekonomi dan Keuangan Islam","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Solutions to money laundering prevention through Regulatory Technology (RegTech): Evidence from Islamic and conventional banks\",\"authors\":\"Alivia Meyrizka Utami, Mega Dwi Septivani\",\"doi\":\"10.20885/jeki.vol8.iss1.art2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose – This study aims to examine the effect of the relationship between RegTech and Money Laundering Prevention (MLP). This study also examines the differences between RegTech in Islamic and conventional banks.Methodology – The current study used explanatory research to test hypotheses using primary data obtained through a survey with a questionnaire conducted online with 100 respondents from bank employees, both conventional and Islamic in Indonesia. In addition, an independent t-test was used.Findings – The results reveal that Transaction Monitoring (TM) and Cost and Time (CT) significantly affect MLP, while electronic Know Your Customer (eKYC) does not affect MLP. The comparative test of the differences in RegTech in Islamic and conventional banks confirm differences in transaction monitoring and cost efficiency between Islamic and conventional banks. At the same time, there is no difference in eKYC between Islamic and conventional banks.Originality – Research related to RegTech in Islamic and conventional banks' money laundering prevention efforts is still very limited in Indonesia. This study will contribute to the existing literature on Islamic finance and the development of financial technology in Indonesia.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34834,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Ekonomi dan Keuangan Islam\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Ekonomi dan Keuangan Islam\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20885/jeki.vol8.iss1.art2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Ekonomi dan Keuangan Islam","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20885/jeki.vol8.iss1.art2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的-本研究旨在检验监管科技与反洗钱(MLP)之间关系的影响。本研究还考察了伊斯兰银行和传统银行RegTech之间的差异。方法-目前的研究使用解释性研究来检验假设,使用的是通过在线问卷调查获得的原始数据,调查对象是印度尼西亚的100名银行员工,包括传统和伊斯兰教员工。此外,采用独立t检验。调查结果-结果显示,交易监控(TM)和成本和时间(CT)显著影响MLP,而电子了解客户(eKYC)不影响MLP。对伊斯兰银行和传统银行RegTech差异的比较测试证实了伊斯兰银行和传统银行在交易监控和成本效率方面的差异。与此同时,伊斯兰银行和传统银行之间的eKYC没有区别。原创性-在印度尼西亚,与伊斯兰和传统银行预防洗钱工作中的RegTech相关的研究仍然非常有限。本研究将有助于现有的伊斯兰金融文献和印尼金融技术的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Solutions to money laundering prevention through Regulatory Technology (RegTech): Evidence from Islamic and conventional banks
Purpose – This study aims to examine the effect of the relationship between RegTech and Money Laundering Prevention (MLP). This study also examines the differences between RegTech in Islamic and conventional banks.Methodology – The current study used explanatory research to test hypotheses using primary data obtained through a survey with a questionnaire conducted online with 100 respondents from bank employees, both conventional and Islamic in Indonesia. In addition, an independent t-test was used.Findings – The results reveal that Transaction Monitoring (TM) and Cost and Time (CT) significantly affect MLP, while electronic Know Your Customer (eKYC) does not affect MLP. The comparative test of the differences in RegTech in Islamic and conventional banks confirm differences in transaction monitoring and cost efficiency between Islamic and conventional banks. At the same time, there is no difference in eKYC between Islamic and conventional banks.Originality – Research related to RegTech in Islamic and conventional banks' money laundering prevention efforts is still very limited in Indonesia. This study will contribute to the existing literature on Islamic finance and the development of financial technology in Indonesia.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信