初次无并发症的髋关节置换术不需要延长常规随访时间

G. K. Wartemberg, Thomas J Goff, S. Jones, J. Newman
{"title":"初次无并发症的髋关节置换术不需要延长常规随访时间","authors":"G. K. Wartemberg, Thomas J Goff, S. Jones, J. Newman","doi":"10.2174/1874325001913010266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There were 145 revision arthroplasties (60 THR and 85 TKR) that met our inclusion criteria. Within the hip arthroplasty group, indications for revision included aseptic loosening (37), dislocation (10), and infection (3), periprosthetic fracture, acetabular liner wear and implant failure. All thirty-seven patients with aseptic loosening presented with pain. Twenty-five were referred from general practice with new symptoms. The remaining were clinic follow-ups. The most common reason for knee revision was aseptic loosening (37), followed by infection (21) and then progressive osteoarthritis (8). Most were referred from GP as a new referral or were clinic follow-ups. All patients were symptomatic.","PeriodicalId":23060,"journal":{"name":"The Open Orthopaedics Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"266-271"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Extended Routine Follow-up of Primary Uncomplicated Hip and Knee Arthroplasty is not Necessary\",\"authors\":\"G. K. Wartemberg, Thomas J Goff, S. Jones, J. Newman\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1874325001913010266\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There were 145 revision arthroplasties (60 THR and 85 TKR) that met our inclusion criteria. Within the hip arthroplasty group, indications for revision included aseptic loosening (37), dislocation (10), and infection (3), periprosthetic fracture, acetabular liner wear and implant failure. All thirty-seven patients with aseptic loosening presented with pain. Twenty-five were referred from general practice with new symptoms. The remaining were clinic follow-ups. The most common reason for knee revision was aseptic loosening (37), followed by infection (21) and then progressive osteoarthritis (8). Most were referred from GP as a new referral or were clinic follow-ups. All patients were symptomatic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23060,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Open Orthopaedics Journal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"266-271\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Open Orthopaedics Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874325001913010266\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Open Orthopaedics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874325001913010266","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

145例翻修性关节置换术(60例THR和85例TKR)符合我们的纳入标准。在髋关节置换术组,翻修指征包括无菌性松动(37例)、脱位(10例)、感染(3例)、假体周围骨折、髋臼衬套磨损和假体失效。37例无菌性松动患者均表现为疼痛。25例有新症状的全科医生转诊。其余为临床随访。膝关节翻修最常见的原因是无菌性松动(37例),其次是感染(21例),然后是进行性骨关节炎(8例)。大多数是全科医生作为新转诊或临床随访转介的。所有患者均有症状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Extended Routine Follow-up of Primary Uncomplicated Hip and Knee Arthroplasty is not Necessary
There were 145 revision arthroplasties (60 THR and 85 TKR) that met our inclusion criteria. Within the hip arthroplasty group, indications for revision included aseptic loosening (37), dislocation (10), and infection (3), periprosthetic fracture, acetabular liner wear and implant failure. All thirty-seven patients with aseptic loosening presented with pain. Twenty-five were referred from general practice with new symptoms. The remaining were clinic follow-ups. The most common reason for knee revision was aseptic loosening (37), followed by infection (21) and then progressive osteoarthritis (8). Most were referred from GP as a new referral or were clinic follow-ups. All patients were symptomatic.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信