中国对全球资本主义的威胁:民族主义的无稽之谈

Q4 Social Sciences
Jerry Harris
{"title":"中国对全球资本主义的威胁:民族主义的无稽之谈","authors":"Jerry Harris","doi":"10.1080/08854300.2021.1890528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In both Europe and the US politicians are generating fear over China’s economic success. In the US, it is common for Republicans and Democrats to compete over who takes the toughest stand against China. But now there is a constant uproar over trade, technology, investments, and military issues, enough to disrupt aspects of globalization. Chinese investments in the US and Europe have run into roadblocks. Trade issues have upset the free flow of commodities and supplies. Attacks against Huawei are slowing down the expansion of 5G technology. And China’s grand strategy for expanding global infrastructure is viewed with suspicion and draws accusations of colonialism. But underneath all the rhetoric and attacks, the transnational capitalist class (TCC) keeps investing across borders and into China. Behind the policy shifts is a crisis of legitimacy for global capitalism. The social divisions resulting from decades of neoliberal globalization have exploded into view. Deeply shaken by the 2008 economic crisis and facing deep social problems from COVID-19, Western capitalism needs an enemy other than itself. China, the convenient “Other,” offers the best target. For the majority of the TCC. the preferred path forward is negotiations through transnational institutions, without disruption to cross-border flows of capital and goods. On the other hand, political elites tasked with maintaining legitimacy with an angry population have pursued nationalism as a politically convenient strategy. The resulting contradictions are causing substantial instability for global capitalism. Schooled in Marxism, the political framework of the Chinese leadership leads it to expect the US state to implement policies of the","PeriodicalId":40061,"journal":{"name":"Socialism and Democracy","volume":"38 1","pages":"92 - 115"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"China’s Threat to Global Capitalism: Nationalist Nonsense\",\"authors\":\"Jerry Harris\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08854300.2021.1890528\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In both Europe and the US politicians are generating fear over China’s economic success. In the US, it is common for Republicans and Democrats to compete over who takes the toughest stand against China. But now there is a constant uproar over trade, technology, investments, and military issues, enough to disrupt aspects of globalization. Chinese investments in the US and Europe have run into roadblocks. Trade issues have upset the free flow of commodities and supplies. Attacks against Huawei are slowing down the expansion of 5G technology. And China’s grand strategy for expanding global infrastructure is viewed with suspicion and draws accusations of colonialism. But underneath all the rhetoric and attacks, the transnational capitalist class (TCC) keeps investing across borders and into China. Behind the policy shifts is a crisis of legitimacy for global capitalism. The social divisions resulting from decades of neoliberal globalization have exploded into view. Deeply shaken by the 2008 economic crisis and facing deep social problems from COVID-19, Western capitalism needs an enemy other than itself. China, the convenient “Other,” offers the best target. For the majority of the TCC. the preferred path forward is negotiations through transnational institutions, without disruption to cross-border flows of capital and goods. On the other hand, political elites tasked with maintaining legitimacy with an angry population have pursued nationalism as a politically convenient strategy. The resulting contradictions are causing substantial instability for global capitalism. Schooled in Marxism, the political framework of the Chinese leadership leads it to expect the US state to implement policies of the\",\"PeriodicalId\":40061,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Socialism and Democracy\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"92 - 115\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Socialism and Democracy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08854300.2021.1890528\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Socialism and Democracy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08854300.2021.1890528","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在欧洲和美国,政界人士都在制造对中国经济成功的担忧。在美国,共和党人和民主党人经常会就谁对中国采取最强硬的立场展开竞争。但现在,在贸易、技术、投资和军事问题上,不断出现骚动,足以扰乱全球化的各个方面。中国在美国和欧洲的投资遇到了障碍。贸易问题扰乱了商品和供应的自由流动。针对华为的攻击正在减缓5G技术的扩展。中国扩大全球基础设施的宏大战略也遭到怀疑,并被指责为殖民主义。但在所有的言论和攻击之下,跨国资产阶级(TCC)仍在跨境投资并进入中国。政策转变的背后是全球资本主义的合法性危机。几十年的新自由主义全球化导致的社会分化已经爆发出来。2008年的经济危机给西方资本主义带来了巨大的冲击,而新冠疫情又给西方资本主义带来了深层次的社会问题。中国,方便的“他者”,提供了最好的目标。对于大多数TCC来说。首选的前进道路是通过跨国机构进行谈判,而不干扰资本和货物的跨境流动。另一方面,政治精英们肩负着在愤怒的民众中维持合法性的任务,他们把追求民族主义作为一种政治上方便的策略。由此产生的矛盾给全球资本主义造成了严重的不稳定。受马克思主义教育的中国领导层的政治框架,使其期望美国政府实施中国的政策
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
China’s Threat to Global Capitalism: Nationalist Nonsense
In both Europe and the US politicians are generating fear over China’s economic success. In the US, it is common for Republicans and Democrats to compete over who takes the toughest stand against China. But now there is a constant uproar over trade, technology, investments, and military issues, enough to disrupt aspects of globalization. Chinese investments in the US and Europe have run into roadblocks. Trade issues have upset the free flow of commodities and supplies. Attacks against Huawei are slowing down the expansion of 5G technology. And China’s grand strategy for expanding global infrastructure is viewed with suspicion and draws accusations of colonialism. But underneath all the rhetoric and attacks, the transnational capitalist class (TCC) keeps investing across borders and into China. Behind the policy shifts is a crisis of legitimacy for global capitalism. The social divisions resulting from decades of neoliberal globalization have exploded into view. Deeply shaken by the 2008 economic crisis and facing deep social problems from COVID-19, Western capitalism needs an enemy other than itself. China, the convenient “Other,” offers the best target. For the majority of the TCC. the preferred path forward is negotiations through transnational institutions, without disruption to cross-border flows of capital and goods. On the other hand, political elites tasked with maintaining legitimacy with an angry population have pursued nationalism as a politically convenient strategy. The resulting contradictions are causing substantial instability for global capitalism. Schooled in Marxism, the political framework of the Chinese leadership leads it to expect the US state to implement policies of the
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Socialism and Democracy
Socialism and Democracy Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Socialism and Democracy is committed to showing the continuing relevance of socialist politics and vision. Socialism and Democracy brings together the worlds of scholarship and activism, theory and practice, to examine in depth the core issues and popular movements of our time. The perspective is broadly Marxist, encouraging not only critique of the status quo, but also informed analysis of the many different approaches to bringing about fundamental change, and seeking to integrate issues of race, gender, sexuality, ethnicity and nationality with the traditional focus on class. Articles reflect many disciplines; our geographical scope is global; authors include activists and independent scholars as well as academics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信