农业系统研究:曼塔罗河谷项目的12个经验教训

Doug Horton
{"title":"农业系统研究:曼塔罗河谷项目的12个经验教训","authors":"Doug Horton","doi":"10.1016/0309-586X(86)90033-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>From 1977 to 1980, the International Potato Center (CIP), in collaboration with Peru's Ministry of Agriculture and the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), conducted a series of farm-level surveys and experiments in the Mantaro Valley of Highland Peru. The lessons of the Mantaro Valley Project can be summarized in 12 points: </p><ul><li><span>1.</span><span><p>1. Ecological conditions and farm type strongly influenced farmers' production methods and technological requirements.</p></span></li><li><span>2.</span><span><p>2. Small farmers were eager to improve their methods.</p></span></li><li><span>3.</span><span><p>3. The recommended ‘technological packages’ had many deficiencies.</p></span></li><li><span>4.</span><span><p>4. Technical knowledge was available to solve some farmers' problems.</p></span></li><li><span>5.</span><span><p>5. Most technologies could not be directly ‘transferred’ to farmers, but needed to be tailored to their specific needs.</p></span></li><li><span>6.</span><span><p>6. Scientific specialization presented several barriers to interdisciplinary research.</p></span></li><li><span>7.</span><span><p>7. The project was costly, in terms of operating capital.</p></span></li><li><span>8.</span><span><p>8. The project's most valuable result was an institutional innovation, not an impact on potato production.</p></span></li><li><span>9.</span><span><p>9. Informal surveys and simple on-farm trials had many advantages over more ‘respectable’, formal methods.</p></span></li><li><span>10.</span><span><p>10. Anthropologists played many useful roles.</p></span></li><li><span>11.</span><span><p>11. Many results of the on-farm research could be extrapolated.</p></span></li><li><span>12.</span><span><p>12. On-farm research was useful for identifying and solving production problems within existing systems, but not for designing entirely new systems.</p></span></li></ul></div>","PeriodicalId":100059,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Administration","volume":"23 2","pages":"Pages 93-107"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0309-586X(86)90033-6","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Farming systems research: Twelve lessons from the Mantaro Valley Project\",\"authors\":\"Doug Horton\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0309-586X(86)90033-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>From 1977 to 1980, the International Potato Center (CIP), in collaboration with Peru's Ministry of Agriculture and the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), conducted a series of farm-level surveys and experiments in the Mantaro Valley of Highland Peru. The lessons of the Mantaro Valley Project can be summarized in 12 points: </p><ul><li><span>1.</span><span><p>1. Ecological conditions and farm type strongly influenced farmers' production methods and technological requirements.</p></span></li><li><span>2.</span><span><p>2. Small farmers were eager to improve their methods.</p></span></li><li><span>3.</span><span><p>3. The recommended ‘technological packages’ had many deficiencies.</p></span></li><li><span>4.</span><span><p>4. Technical knowledge was available to solve some farmers' problems.</p></span></li><li><span>5.</span><span><p>5. Most technologies could not be directly ‘transferred’ to farmers, but needed to be tailored to their specific needs.</p></span></li><li><span>6.</span><span><p>6. Scientific specialization presented several barriers to interdisciplinary research.</p></span></li><li><span>7.</span><span><p>7. The project was costly, in terms of operating capital.</p></span></li><li><span>8.</span><span><p>8. The project's most valuable result was an institutional innovation, not an impact on potato production.</p></span></li><li><span>9.</span><span><p>9. Informal surveys and simple on-farm trials had many advantages over more ‘respectable’, formal methods.</p></span></li><li><span>10.</span><span><p>10. Anthropologists played many useful roles.</p></span></li><li><span>11.</span><span><p>11. Many results of the on-farm research could be extrapolated.</p></span></li><li><span>12.</span><span><p>12. On-farm research was useful for identifying and solving production problems within existing systems, but not for designing entirely new systems.</p></span></li></ul></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100059,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agricultural Administration\",\"volume\":\"23 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 93-107\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1986-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0309-586X(86)90033-6\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agricultural Administration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0309586X86900336\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Administration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0309586X86900336","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

从1977年到1980年,国际马铃薯中心(CIP)与秘鲁农业部和国际玉米和小麦改良中心(CIMMYT)合作,在秘鲁高地的曼塔罗山谷进行了一系列农场水平的调查和实验。曼塔罗河谷项目的经验可以总结为12点:生态条件和农场类型强烈影响农民的生产方式和技术要求。小农们渴望改进他们的耕作方法。建议的“一揽子技术”有许多不足之处。技术知识可以解决一些农民的问题。大多数技术不能直接“转让”给农民,而需要根据他们的具体需要进行调整。科学专业化给跨学科研究带来了一些障碍。就营运资金而言,这项工程耗资巨大。该项目最有价值的成果是制度上的创新,而不是对马铃薯生产的影响。非正式调查和简单的农场试验比更“体面”的正式方法有许多优点。人类学家发挥了许多有益的作用。农场研究的许多结果可以外推。农场研究有助于识别和解决现有系统中的生产问题,但无助于设计全新的系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Farming systems research: Twelve lessons from the Mantaro Valley Project

From 1977 to 1980, the International Potato Center (CIP), in collaboration with Peru's Ministry of Agriculture and the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), conducted a series of farm-level surveys and experiments in the Mantaro Valley of Highland Peru. The lessons of the Mantaro Valley Project can be summarized in 12 points:

  • 1.

    1. Ecological conditions and farm type strongly influenced farmers' production methods and technological requirements.

  • 2.

    2. Small farmers were eager to improve their methods.

  • 3.

    3. The recommended ‘technological packages’ had many deficiencies.

  • 4.

    4. Technical knowledge was available to solve some farmers' problems.

  • 5.

    5. Most technologies could not be directly ‘transferred’ to farmers, but needed to be tailored to their specific needs.

  • 6.

    6. Scientific specialization presented several barriers to interdisciplinary research.

  • 7.

    7. The project was costly, in terms of operating capital.

  • 8.

    8. The project's most valuable result was an institutional innovation, not an impact on potato production.

  • 9.

    9. Informal surveys and simple on-farm trials had many advantages over more ‘respectable’, formal methods.

  • 10.

    10. Anthropologists played many useful roles.

  • 11.

    11. Many results of the on-farm research could be extrapolated.

  • 12.

    12. On-farm research was useful for identifying and solving production problems within existing systems, but not for designing entirely new systems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信