电子邮件取证工具的实证分析

A. Ghafarian, Ashraf Mady, Kyungwhan Park
{"title":"电子邮件取证工具的实证分析","authors":"A. Ghafarian, Ashraf Mady, Kyungwhan Park","doi":"10.5121/ijnsa.2020.12303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Emails are the most common service on the Internet for communication and sending documents. Email is used not only from computers but also from many other electronic devices such as tablets; smartphones, etc. Emails can also be used for criminal activities. Email forensic refers to the study of email detail and content as evidence to identify the actual sender and recipient of a message, date/time of transmission, detailed record of email transaction, intent of the sender, etc. Email forensics involves investigation of metadata, keyword, searching, port scanning and generating report based on investigators need. Many tools are available for any investigation that involves email forensics. Investigators should be very careful of not violating user’s privacy. To this end, investigators should run keyword searches to reveal only the relevant emails. Therefore, knowledge of the features of the tool and the search features is necessary for the tool selection. In this research, we experimentally compare the performance of several email forensics tools. Our aim is to help the investigators with the tool selection task. We evaluate the tools in terms of their keyword search, report generation, and other features such as, email format, size of the file accepted, whether they work online or offline, format of the reports, etc. We use Enron email data set for our experiment.","PeriodicalId":93303,"journal":{"name":"International journal of network security & its applications","volume":"191 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Empirical Analysis of Email Forensics Tools\",\"authors\":\"A. Ghafarian, Ashraf Mady, Kyungwhan Park\",\"doi\":\"10.5121/ijnsa.2020.12303\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Emails are the most common service on the Internet for communication and sending documents. Email is used not only from computers but also from many other electronic devices such as tablets; smartphones, etc. Emails can also be used for criminal activities. Email forensic refers to the study of email detail and content as evidence to identify the actual sender and recipient of a message, date/time of transmission, detailed record of email transaction, intent of the sender, etc. Email forensics involves investigation of metadata, keyword, searching, port scanning and generating report based on investigators need. Many tools are available for any investigation that involves email forensics. Investigators should be very careful of not violating user’s privacy. To this end, investigators should run keyword searches to reveal only the relevant emails. Therefore, knowledge of the features of the tool and the search features is necessary for the tool selection. In this research, we experimentally compare the performance of several email forensics tools. Our aim is to help the investigators with the tool selection task. We evaluate the tools in terms of their keyword search, report generation, and other features such as, email format, size of the file accepted, whether they work online or offline, format of the reports, etc. We use Enron email data set for our experiment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93303,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of network security & its applications\",\"volume\":\"191 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of network security & its applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5121/ijnsa.2020.12303\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of network security & its applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5121/ijnsa.2020.12303","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

电子邮件是互联网上最常见的通信和发送文件的服务。电子邮件不仅可以在电脑上使用,还可以在许多其他电子设备上使用,如平板电脑;智能手机等。电子邮件也可以用于犯罪活动。电子邮件取证是指研究电子邮件的细节和内容作为证据,以识别信息的实际发送者和接收者、传输日期/时间、电子邮件交易的详细记录、发送者的意图等。电子邮件取证包括元数据调查、关键字、搜索、端口扫描和根据调查人员的需要生成报告。有许多工具可用于涉及电子邮件取证的任何调查。调查人员应该非常小心,不要侵犯用户的隐私。为此,调查人员应该进行关键词搜索,只发现相关的电子邮件。因此,了解工具的特征和搜索特征是选择工具的必要条件。在本研究中,我们通过实验比较了几种电子邮件取证工具的性能。我们的目的是帮助研究者完成工具选择任务。我们根据关键字搜索、报告生成和其他功能(如电子邮件格式、接受的文件大小、它们是在线工作还是离线工作、报告格式等)来评估这些工具。我们使用安然电子邮件数据集进行实验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Empirical Analysis of Email Forensics Tools
Emails are the most common service on the Internet for communication and sending documents. Email is used not only from computers but also from many other electronic devices such as tablets; smartphones, etc. Emails can also be used for criminal activities. Email forensic refers to the study of email detail and content as evidence to identify the actual sender and recipient of a message, date/time of transmission, detailed record of email transaction, intent of the sender, etc. Email forensics involves investigation of metadata, keyword, searching, port scanning and generating report based on investigators need. Many tools are available for any investigation that involves email forensics. Investigators should be very careful of not violating user’s privacy. To this end, investigators should run keyword searches to reveal only the relevant emails. Therefore, knowledge of the features of the tool and the search features is necessary for the tool selection. In this research, we experimentally compare the performance of several email forensics tools. Our aim is to help the investigators with the tool selection task. We evaluate the tools in terms of their keyword search, report generation, and other features such as, email format, size of the file accepted, whether they work online or offline, format of the reports, etc. We use Enron email data set for our experiment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信