加德满都谷地公共车辆司机职业人体工程学与健康风险相关因素

Dip Bahadur Singh, Prem Prasad Neupane, Jeni Singh
{"title":"加德满都谷地公共车辆司机职业人体工程学与健康风险相关因素","authors":"Dip Bahadur Singh, Prem Prasad Neupane, Jeni Singh","doi":"10.52403/ijshr.20230336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Driving is common in Kathmandu, vital for livelihood. Driver safety is crucial. Ergonomics create safe workspaces. Weather, traffic, risky behaviours cause accidents. Ergonomic mods reduce injuries, promote safety for all. Address driver health issues for a healthier transportation system. The prevalence of low back pain (LBP) was high at 73.9%. LBP was significantly associated with work duration exceeding 10 years, working more than 8 hours per day, and having more accidents while driving the bus in the previous year. Among ergonomic risk factors, individuals who reported discomfort with seats and steering wheels had a significantly higher LBP prevalence.\nMethodology: Descriptive cross-sectional design assessed ergonomic factors and health risk among public vehicle drivers in Kathmandu Valley. Study covered three districts (Kathmandu, Lalitpur, and Bhaktapur) for accessibility and diverse vehicles. Time Duration: Bhadra 2077 to Ashadh 2078. Study. Public drivers aged 20 to below 60 years, with at least two years' experience. This are the primary data from a structured questionnaire whereas the sample size were 394 drivers calculated with 95% confidence interval and 5% marginal error. And convenience and purposive sampling technique was applied the data were collected by Face-to-face interviews using a structured questionnaire on socio-demographics, economics, occupation, environment, workload, and health risk factors.\nFindings: Within the last year, respondents experienced ergonomics-related health risks: fatigue (27.7%), LBP (22.5%), body ache (10.9%), shoulder pain (7.1%), neck pain (5.3%), MSD (4.8%), and RTA injuries (4.8%). Other health issues observed were respiratory problems (9.6%), gastritis (10.1%), headache (8.1%), blood pressure-related problems (4.8%), blood sugar issues (3.6%), and Covid-19 impact (1.5%). Overall, 4.96% reported health problems, with 0.39% requiring hospitalization during that period.\nConclusion: Overall, the study found associations between certain factors (e.g., alcohol, speed, work hours, route duration, seat comfort, height-adjustable seat, foldable seat) and health risks (severe injuries, hospitalization after RTA, sleeping disorder, mental stress, body ache, fatigue, LBP, neck pain, MSD).\n\nKeywords: [Ergonomics, Occupational Ergonomics, Public Vehicles, Health Risks.]","PeriodicalId":14300,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Science and Healthcare Research","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors Associated with Occupational Ergonomics and Health Risk Among Public Vehicle Drivers in Kathmandu Valley\",\"authors\":\"Dip Bahadur Singh, Prem Prasad Neupane, Jeni Singh\",\"doi\":\"10.52403/ijshr.20230336\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Driving is common in Kathmandu, vital for livelihood. Driver safety is crucial. Ergonomics create safe workspaces. Weather, traffic, risky behaviours cause accidents. Ergonomic mods reduce injuries, promote safety for all. Address driver health issues for a healthier transportation system. The prevalence of low back pain (LBP) was high at 73.9%. LBP was significantly associated with work duration exceeding 10 years, working more than 8 hours per day, and having more accidents while driving the bus in the previous year. Among ergonomic risk factors, individuals who reported discomfort with seats and steering wheels had a significantly higher LBP prevalence.\\nMethodology: Descriptive cross-sectional design assessed ergonomic factors and health risk among public vehicle drivers in Kathmandu Valley. Study covered three districts (Kathmandu, Lalitpur, and Bhaktapur) for accessibility and diverse vehicles. Time Duration: Bhadra 2077 to Ashadh 2078. Study. Public drivers aged 20 to below 60 years, with at least two years' experience. This are the primary data from a structured questionnaire whereas the sample size were 394 drivers calculated with 95% confidence interval and 5% marginal error. And convenience and purposive sampling technique was applied the data were collected by Face-to-face interviews using a structured questionnaire on socio-demographics, economics, occupation, environment, workload, and health risk factors.\\nFindings: Within the last year, respondents experienced ergonomics-related health risks: fatigue (27.7%), LBP (22.5%), body ache (10.9%), shoulder pain (7.1%), neck pain (5.3%), MSD (4.8%), and RTA injuries (4.8%). Other health issues observed were respiratory problems (9.6%), gastritis (10.1%), headache (8.1%), blood pressure-related problems (4.8%), blood sugar issues (3.6%), and Covid-19 impact (1.5%). Overall, 4.96% reported health problems, with 0.39% requiring hospitalization during that period.\\nConclusion: Overall, the study found associations between certain factors (e.g., alcohol, speed, work hours, route duration, seat comfort, height-adjustable seat, foldable seat) and health risks (severe injuries, hospitalization after RTA, sleeping disorder, mental stress, body ache, fatigue, LBP, neck pain, MSD).\\n\\nKeywords: [Ergonomics, Occupational Ergonomics, Public Vehicles, Health Risks.]\",\"PeriodicalId\":14300,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Science and Healthcare Research\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Science and Healthcare Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52403/ijshr.20230336\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Science and Healthcare Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52403/ijshr.20230336","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:开车在加德满都很常见,对生计至关重要。驾驶员的安全至关重要。人体工程学创造安全的工作空间。天气、交通、危险行为都会导致事故。人体工程学模型减少伤害,促进所有人的安全。为更健康的交通系统解决司机健康问题。腰痛(LBP)患病率高达73.9%。LBP与工作年限超过10年、每天工作超过8小时、前一年驾驶公共汽车时发生事故的次数显著相关。在人体工程学风险因素中,报告座椅和方向盘不适的个体具有显着更高的LBP患病率。方法:描述性横断面设计评估加德满都谷地公共车辆司机的人体工程学因素和健康风险。研究涵盖了三个地区(加德满都、拉利特普尔和巴克塔普尔)的可达性和车辆种类。时间持续:Bhadra 2077至Ashadh 2078。研究。年龄介乎二十至六十岁以下,具二年以上驾驶经验的公共司机。这是来自结构化问卷的主要数据,而样本量为394名司机,以95%的置信区间和5%的边际误差计算。采用方便、有目的的抽样方法,采用面对面访谈的方式,对社会人口、经济、职业、环境、工作量、健康风险因素等进行结构化问卷调查。调查结果:在去年,受访者经历了与人体工程学相关的健康风险:疲劳(27.7%)、腰痛(22.5%)、身体疼痛(10.9%)、肩痛(7.1%)、颈部疼痛(5.3%)、MSD(4.8%)和RTA损伤(4.8%)。观察到的其他健康问题包括呼吸问题(9.6%)、胃炎(10.1%)、头痛(8.1%)、血压相关问题(4.8%)、血糖问题(3.6%)和Covid-19影响(1.5%)。总体而言,4.96%的人报告有健康问题,0.39%的人在此期间需要住院治疗。结论:总体而言,研究发现某些因素(如酒精、速度、工作时间、路线持续时间、座椅舒适度、可调高度座椅、可折叠座椅)与健康风险(严重伤害、RTA后住院、睡眠障碍、精神压力、身体疼痛、疲劳、腰痛、颈部疼痛、MSD)之间存在关联。关键词:[工效学;职业工效学;公共交通工具;
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Factors Associated with Occupational Ergonomics and Health Risk Among Public Vehicle Drivers in Kathmandu Valley
Background: Driving is common in Kathmandu, vital for livelihood. Driver safety is crucial. Ergonomics create safe workspaces. Weather, traffic, risky behaviours cause accidents. Ergonomic mods reduce injuries, promote safety for all. Address driver health issues for a healthier transportation system. The prevalence of low back pain (LBP) was high at 73.9%. LBP was significantly associated with work duration exceeding 10 years, working more than 8 hours per day, and having more accidents while driving the bus in the previous year. Among ergonomic risk factors, individuals who reported discomfort with seats and steering wheels had a significantly higher LBP prevalence. Methodology: Descriptive cross-sectional design assessed ergonomic factors and health risk among public vehicle drivers in Kathmandu Valley. Study covered three districts (Kathmandu, Lalitpur, and Bhaktapur) for accessibility and diverse vehicles. Time Duration: Bhadra 2077 to Ashadh 2078. Study. Public drivers aged 20 to below 60 years, with at least two years' experience. This are the primary data from a structured questionnaire whereas the sample size were 394 drivers calculated with 95% confidence interval and 5% marginal error. And convenience and purposive sampling technique was applied the data were collected by Face-to-face interviews using a structured questionnaire on socio-demographics, economics, occupation, environment, workload, and health risk factors. Findings: Within the last year, respondents experienced ergonomics-related health risks: fatigue (27.7%), LBP (22.5%), body ache (10.9%), shoulder pain (7.1%), neck pain (5.3%), MSD (4.8%), and RTA injuries (4.8%). Other health issues observed were respiratory problems (9.6%), gastritis (10.1%), headache (8.1%), blood pressure-related problems (4.8%), blood sugar issues (3.6%), and Covid-19 impact (1.5%). Overall, 4.96% reported health problems, with 0.39% requiring hospitalization during that period. Conclusion: Overall, the study found associations between certain factors (e.g., alcohol, speed, work hours, route duration, seat comfort, height-adjustable seat, foldable seat) and health risks (severe injuries, hospitalization after RTA, sleeping disorder, mental stress, body ache, fatigue, LBP, neck pain, MSD). Keywords: [Ergonomics, Occupational Ergonomics, Public Vehicles, Health Risks.]
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信