认知不公和身体质量指数:检查Māori和太平洋妇女获得生育治疗在新西兰奥特罗阿

IF 0.8 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
R. Shaw, E. Fehoko
{"title":"认知不公和身体质量指数:检查Māori和太平洋妇女获得生育治疗在新西兰奥特罗阿","authors":"R. Shaw, E. Fehoko","doi":"10.1080/21604851.2022.2063507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The availability and uptake of assisted reproductive technologies is increasing across the globe yet delays and disparities continue to exist for many Indigenous and minority ethnic groups in terms of outcomes and access to fertility treatment and reproductive services. In this article, we examine the fertility stories of nine Māori (Indigenous people of Aotearoa) and Pacific cisgender women living in Aotearoa who were interviewed as part of a large qualitative study conducted with participants seeking access to assisted reproduction for the purposes of family building. The focus of the article is on the experiences of Māori and Pacific women for whom clinical criteria, which include a Body Mass Index cutoff of 32 kg/m2, present a key barrier blocking access to publicly funded fertility services. We draw on the conceptual tool of epistemic injustice, described by the philosopher Miranda Fricker, as a lens through which to examine the challenges Māori and Pacific women face accessing fertility treatment. The study findings indicate that most participants, at some point throughout the course of their reproductive journeys, encountered epistemic injustice when seeking fertility treatment. To redress this bias, we believe revision of Body Mass Index criteria guidelines, which were implemented as part of a nationwide Clinical Priority Criteria Assessment strategy more than 20 years old, are warranted.","PeriodicalId":37967,"journal":{"name":"Fat Studies-An Interdisciplinary Journal of Body Weight and Society","volume":"19 1","pages":"338 - 352"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Epistemic injustice and Body Mass Index: Examining Māori and Pacific women’s access to fertility treatment in Aotearoa New Zealand\",\"authors\":\"R. Shaw, E. Fehoko\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21604851.2022.2063507\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The availability and uptake of assisted reproductive technologies is increasing across the globe yet delays and disparities continue to exist for many Indigenous and minority ethnic groups in terms of outcomes and access to fertility treatment and reproductive services. In this article, we examine the fertility stories of nine Māori (Indigenous people of Aotearoa) and Pacific cisgender women living in Aotearoa who were interviewed as part of a large qualitative study conducted with participants seeking access to assisted reproduction for the purposes of family building. The focus of the article is on the experiences of Māori and Pacific women for whom clinical criteria, which include a Body Mass Index cutoff of 32 kg/m2, present a key barrier blocking access to publicly funded fertility services. We draw on the conceptual tool of epistemic injustice, described by the philosopher Miranda Fricker, as a lens through which to examine the challenges Māori and Pacific women face accessing fertility treatment. The study findings indicate that most participants, at some point throughout the course of their reproductive journeys, encountered epistemic injustice when seeking fertility treatment. To redress this bias, we believe revision of Body Mass Index criteria guidelines, which were implemented as part of a nationwide Clinical Priority Criteria Assessment strategy more than 20 years old, are warranted.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37967,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fat Studies-An Interdisciplinary Journal of Body Weight and Society\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"338 - 352\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fat Studies-An Interdisciplinary Journal of Body Weight and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21604851.2022.2063507\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fat Studies-An Interdisciplinary Journal of Body Weight and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21604851.2022.2063507","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

辅助生殖技术的可用性和吸收在全球范围内不断增加,但在结果和获得生育治疗和生殖服务方面,许多土著和少数民族群体仍然存在延迟和差异。在这篇文章中,我们研究了9位Māori (Aotearoa土著人)和生活在Aotearoa的太平洋顺性妇女的生育故事,这些妇女是一项大型定性研究的一部分,该研究的参与者寻求以家庭建设为目的的辅助生殖。这篇文章的重点是Māori和太平洋妇女的经验,她们的临床标准,包括身体质量指数32公斤/平方米的下限,是阻碍获得公共资助的生育服务的主要障碍。我们利用哲学家米兰达·弗里克(Miranda Fricker)所描述的认知不公正的概念工具,作为审视Māori和太平洋地区妇女在获得生育治疗方面面临的挑战的镜头。研究结果表明,大多数参与者在生育过程中的某个时刻,在寻求生育治疗时遇到了认知上的不公正。为了纠正这一偏见,我们认为修订身体质量指数标准指南是有必要的,该指南作为全国临床优先标准评估战略的一部分实施了20多年。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Epistemic injustice and Body Mass Index: Examining Māori and Pacific women’s access to fertility treatment in Aotearoa New Zealand
ABSTRACT The availability and uptake of assisted reproductive technologies is increasing across the globe yet delays and disparities continue to exist for many Indigenous and minority ethnic groups in terms of outcomes and access to fertility treatment and reproductive services. In this article, we examine the fertility stories of nine Māori (Indigenous people of Aotearoa) and Pacific cisgender women living in Aotearoa who were interviewed as part of a large qualitative study conducted with participants seeking access to assisted reproduction for the purposes of family building. The focus of the article is on the experiences of Māori and Pacific women for whom clinical criteria, which include a Body Mass Index cutoff of 32 kg/m2, present a key barrier blocking access to publicly funded fertility services. We draw on the conceptual tool of epistemic injustice, described by the philosopher Miranda Fricker, as a lens through which to examine the challenges Māori and Pacific women face accessing fertility treatment. The study findings indicate that most participants, at some point throughout the course of their reproductive journeys, encountered epistemic injustice when seeking fertility treatment. To redress this bias, we believe revision of Body Mass Index criteria guidelines, which were implemented as part of a nationwide Clinical Priority Criteria Assessment strategy more than 20 years old, are warranted.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
32
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信