{"title":"Mesjasz na kozetce. Rec.: Paweł Dybel, Mesjasz, który odszedł. Bruno Schulz i psychoanaliza. Kraków 2017","authors":"Wojciech Śmieja","doi":"10.18318/pl.2018.3.17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"WOjciecH ŚMiejA University of Silesia, Katowice MeSSiAH On THe cOAcH The author of the polemical review of paweł dybel’s book indicates exhaustion of psychoanalytical key in interpreting the work of the drohobych writer. dybel’s treatise is by no means the height of psychoanalytical interpretive tradition and offers a number of stimulating remarks (e.g. placing Schulz’s word philosophy in the framework of german idealism). Simultaneously, the impassable horizon of psychoanalytical interpretation blocks the perception of historicity and politicality written into Schultz project. 32 d e l e u z e, G u a t t a r i, op. cit., s. 93.","PeriodicalId":42580,"journal":{"name":"PAMIETNIK LITERACKI","volume":"23 1","pages":"253-261"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PAMIETNIK LITERACKI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18318/pl.2018.3.17","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, SLAVIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
WOjciecH ŚMiejA西里西亚大学,卡托维兹·弥赛亚在教练上对帕维沃德贝尔的书进行辩论性评论的作者指出,在解释这位德罗霍比奇作家的作品时,精神分析学的关键已经耗尽。迪贝尔的论文绝不是精神分析解释传统的高度,并提供了许多令人兴奋的评论(例如将舒尔茨的“哲学”一词置于德国唯心主义的框架中)。同时,精神分析解释的不可逾越的视界阻碍了舒尔茨项目中对历史性和政治性的感知。32 .我的意思是,我的意思是,我的意思是,我的意思是,我的意思是,我的意思是,我的意思是。
Mesjasz na kozetce. Rec.: Paweł Dybel, Mesjasz, który odszedł. Bruno Schulz i psychoanaliza. Kraków 2017
WOjciecH ŚMiejA University of Silesia, Katowice MeSSiAH On THe cOAcH The author of the polemical review of paweł dybel’s book indicates exhaustion of psychoanalytical key in interpreting the work of the drohobych writer. dybel’s treatise is by no means the height of psychoanalytical interpretive tradition and offers a number of stimulating remarks (e.g. placing Schulz’s word philosophy in the framework of german idealism). Simultaneously, the impassable horizon of psychoanalytical interpretation blocks the perception of historicity and politicality written into Schultz project. 32 d e l e u z e, G u a t t a r i, op. cit., s. 93.