尚塔尔·阿克曼的静物:阿克曼的动态图像和17世纪荷兰绘画

IF 0.4 3区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY
R. Luca
{"title":"尚塔尔·阿克曼的静物:阿克曼的动态图像和17世纪荷兰绘画","authors":"R. Luca","doi":"10.1080/03096564.2020.1766829","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Throughout her career, the Belgian filmmaker Chantal Akerman accelerated the erosion of boundaries separating the visual arts that has fuelled our current moment of mixed media. This article, though, takes different approach to Akerman’s work. It argues that her cinema borrows from a historical type of viewing experience just as much as it pioneered new ones. Specifically, I argue that Akerman drew on the painterly language of seventeenth-century Dutch still-lifes through her use of stillness, texture, space, light, and (self-)portraiture that undermines mainstream modes of visual representation as developed by Renaissance art. Relying on contemporary film theory, art history, and Akerman’s own idiosyncratic style and biography, this essay yields a productive, if unexpected, point of comparison between the aesthetic practices of early modern Dutch painting and Akerman’s moving images. Comparing several of Akerman’s pictures to a handful of masterpieces of seventeenth-century Dutch art, this work joins a growing discourse among visual theorists in exploring connections between cinema and painting more broadly.","PeriodicalId":41997,"journal":{"name":"Dutch Crossing-Journal of Low Countries Studies","volume":"12 1","pages":"263 - 278"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Still Life(s) of Chantal Akerman: Akerman’s Moving Images and Dutch 17th-Century Painting\",\"authors\":\"R. Luca\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/03096564.2020.1766829\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Throughout her career, the Belgian filmmaker Chantal Akerman accelerated the erosion of boundaries separating the visual arts that has fuelled our current moment of mixed media. This article, though, takes different approach to Akerman’s work. It argues that her cinema borrows from a historical type of viewing experience just as much as it pioneered new ones. Specifically, I argue that Akerman drew on the painterly language of seventeenth-century Dutch still-lifes through her use of stillness, texture, space, light, and (self-)portraiture that undermines mainstream modes of visual representation as developed by Renaissance art. Relying on contemporary film theory, art history, and Akerman’s own idiosyncratic style and biography, this essay yields a productive, if unexpected, point of comparison between the aesthetic practices of early modern Dutch painting and Akerman’s moving images. Comparing several of Akerman’s pictures to a handful of masterpieces of seventeenth-century Dutch art, this work joins a growing discourse among visual theorists in exploring connections between cinema and painting more broadly.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dutch Crossing-Journal of Low Countries Studies\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"263 - 278\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dutch Crossing-Journal of Low Countries Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/03096564.2020.1766829\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dutch Crossing-Journal of Low Countries Studies","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03096564.2020.1766829","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在她的整个职业生涯中,比利时电影制作人尚塔尔·阿克曼(Chantal Akerman)加速了视觉艺术界限的侵蚀,这些界限推动了我们当前的混合媒体时代。然而,这篇文章对阿克曼的工作采取了不同的方法。它认为,她的电影借鉴了一种历史类型的观看体验,就像它开创了新的体验一样。具体来说,我认为阿克曼借鉴了17世纪荷兰静物画的绘画语言,通过她对静止、纹理、空间、光线和(自我)肖像的使用,破坏了文艺复兴艺术发展起来的视觉表现的主流模式。依靠当代电影理论、艺术史和阿克曼自己独特的风格和传记,这篇文章在早期现代荷兰绘画的审美实践和阿克曼的运动图像之间产生了一个富有成效的比较点,如果意想不到的话。将阿克曼的几幅作品与17世纪荷兰艺术的几幅杰作进行比较,这部作品加入了视觉理论家们越来越广泛地探讨电影和绘画之间联系的话语。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Still Life(s) of Chantal Akerman: Akerman’s Moving Images and Dutch 17th-Century Painting
ABSTRACT Throughout her career, the Belgian filmmaker Chantal Akerman accelerated the erosion of boundaries separating the visual arts that has fuelled our current moment of mixed media. This article, though, takes different approach to Akerman’s work. It argues that her cinema borrows from a historical type of viewing experience just as much as it pioneered new ones. Specifically, I argue that Akerman drew on the painterly language of seventeenth-century Dutch still-lifes through her use of stillness, texture, space, light, and (self-)portraiture that undermines mainstream modes of visual representation as developed by Renaissance art. Relying on contemporary film theory, art history, and Akerman’s own idiosyncratic style and biography, this essay yields a productive, if unexpected, point of comparison between the aesthetic practices of early modern Dutch painting and Akerman’s moving images. Comparing several of Akerman’s pictures to a handful of masterpieces of seventeenth-century Dutch art, this work joins a growing discourse among visual theorists in exploring connections between cinema and painting more broadly.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
20.00%
发文量
6
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信