孤立的粗隆下降和大粗隆突起成形术对治疗perthes后畸形无效。

Jonathan D. Haskel, Oren I. Feder, J. Mijares, P. Castañeda
{"title":"孤立的粗隆下降和大粗隆突起成形术对治疗perthes后畸形无效。","authors":"Jonathan D. Haskel, Oren I. Feder, J. Mijares, P. Castañeda","doi":"10.1097/CORR.0000000000000990","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nGreater trochanteric apophyseodesis and isolated trochanteric descent seek to prevent abductor weakness in patients with a hip deformity because of Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease; however, no studies have evaluated radiographic findings or abductor strength in children treated with these procedures.\n\n\nQUESTIONS/PURPOSES\n(1) Do children with Waldenström Stage III Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease treated with either isolated greater trochanteric descent or isolated greater trochanteric apophyseodesis achieve improved radiographic findings (Stulberg classification or neck-shaft angle) compared with those who underwent no surgical treatment? (2) Do children treated with one of those procedures achieve greater abductor strength than those who did not have surgery?\n\n\nMETHODS\nBetween 2006 and 2010, we treated 89 children with Waldenström Type III Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease (reossification). Of these, 27.9% (12 patients) underwent greater trochanteric descent, 25.6% (11 patients) underwent greater trochanteric apophyseodesis, and 46.5% (20 patients) did not have surgery. During that time, the decision to perform either apophyseodesis or trochanteric descent was made by the surgeon based on the subjective appearance of remaining growth from the greater trochanter. Nonsurgical management was chosen by the parents of the patients after the risks and benefits of surgery were discussed. During greater trochanteric descent, the greater trochanter was osteotomized and fixed distally with two 7.0-mm screws. During greater trochanteric apophyseodesis, the physis was identified fluoroscopically, and the lateral half of the growth plate was drilled. Nonoperative treatment involved serial clinical and radiographic evaluations every 3 to 6 months. All children in all groups were available for follow-up at a minimum of 6 years. The median follow-up durations for children undergoing greater trochanteric descent, greater trochanteric apophyseodesis, and control cohorts were 6.6 years (range 6.0-8.2 years), 6.5 years (range 6.1-9.2 years), and 7.4 years (range 6.0-9.1 years), respectively. On presentation, each patient's affected hip was classified according to the Stulberg classification by the operating surgeon and an orthopaedic surgeon not involved in the child's care. The neck-shaft angle was measured for each patient before surgery and at the final follow-up examination. Abductor strength was assessed by a pediatric orthopaedic fellow and a physical therapist with the patient in the lateral decubitus position. Each patient was given a muscle strength score on a scale of 0 to 10 points, per a modification of the Medical Research Council scale to allow for a narrower range. We had 80% power to detect an 8° difference in the neck-shaft angle between the greater trochanteric apophyseodesis and nonoperative management cohorts. A sample size of 6.8 patients per cohort would be necessary to detect the above endpoint.\n\n\nRESULTS\nWith the numbers available, we found no differences among the groups in the proportion of patients with Stulberg Class 2 femoral heads (two of 12 patients in the isolated trochanteric descent group, three of 11 in the isolated trochanteric apophyseodesis group, and two of 20 who did not undergo surgery; p = 0.46). Likewise, there were no differences among the three groups in terms of the neck-shaft angle at a minimum of 6 years of follow-up (122° ± 6°, 119° ± 7°, and 126° ± 8° in the isolated trochanteric descent, isolated trochanteric apophyseodesis, and nonoperative groups, respectively). There were no differences among the groups in term of the median abductor strength test result: seven of 10 (range 6-8), six of 10 (range 6-8), and six of 10 (range 6-10; p = 0.34).\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nBecause neither isolated greater trochanteric descent nor greater trochanteric apophyseodesis alone had an effect on hip morphology or abductor strength in children with sequellae of Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease, we conclude these types of extraarticular surgery are ineffective. Therefore, we no longer perform isolated trochanteric descent or apophyseodesis.\n\n\nLEVEL OF EVIDENCE\nLevel III, therapeutic study.","PeriodicalId":10465,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research","volume":"145 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Isolated Trochanteric Descent and Greater Trochanteric Apophyseodesis Are Not Effective in the Treatment of Post-Perthes Deformity.\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan D. Haskel, Oren I. Feder, J. Mijares, P. Castañeda\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CORR.0000000000000990\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\nGreater trochanteric apophyseodesis and isolated trochanteric descent seek to prevent abductor weakness in patients with a hip deformity because of Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease; however, no studies have evaluated radiographic findings or abductor strength in children treated with these procedures.\\n\\n\\nQUESTIONS/PURPOSES\\n(1) Do children with Waldenström Stage III Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease treated with either isolated greater trochanteric descent or isolated greater trochanteric apophyseodesis achieve improved radiographic findings (Stulberg classification or neck-shaft angle) compared with those who underwent no surgical treatment? (2) Do children treated with one of those procedures achieve greater abductor strength than those who did not have surgery?\\n\\n\\nMETHODS\\nBetween 2006 and 2010, we treated 89 children with Waldenström Type III Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease (reossification). Of these, 27.9% (12 patients) underwent greater trochanteric descent, 25.6% (11 patients) underwent greater trochanteric apophyseodesis, and 46.5% (20 patients) did not have surgery. During that time, the decision to perform either apophyseodesis or trochanteric descent was made by the surgeon based on the subjective appearance of remaining growth from the greater trochanter. Nonsurgical management was chosen by the parents of the patients after the risks and benefits of surgery were discussed. During greater trochanteric descent, the greater trochanter was osteotomized and fixed distally with two 7.0-mm screws. During greater trochanteric apophyseodesis, the physis was identified fluoroscopically, and the lateral half of the growth plate was drilled. Nonoperative treatment involved serial clinical and radiographic evaluations every 3 to 6 months. All children in all groups were available for follow-up at a minimum of 6 years. The median follow-up durations for children undergoing greater trochanteric descent, greater trochanteric apophyseodesis, and control cohorts were 6.6 years (range 6.0-8.2 years), 6.5 years (range 6.1-9.2 years), and 7.4 years (range 6.0-9.1 years), respectively. On presentation, each patient's affected hip was classified according to the Stulberg classification by the operating surgeon and an orthopaedic surgeon not involved in the child's care. The neck-shaft angle was measured for each patient before surgery and at the final follow-up examination. Abductor strength was assessed by a pediatric orthopaedic fellow and a physical therapist with the patient in the lateral decubitus position. Each patient was given a muscle strength score on a scale of 0 to 10 points, per a modification of the Medical Research Council scale to allow for a narrower range. We had 80% power to detect an 8° difference in the neck-shaft angle between the greater trochanteric apophyseodesis and nonoperative management cohorts. A sample size of 6.8 patients per cohort would be necessary to detect the above endpoint.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nWith the numbers available, we found no differences among the groups in the proportion of patients with Stulberg Class 2 femoral heads (two of 12 patients in the isolated trochanteric descent group, three of 11 in the isolated trochanteric apophyseodesis group, and two of 20 who did not undergo surgery; p = 0.46). Likewise, there were no differences among the three groups in terms of the neck-shaft angle at a minimum of 6 years of follow-up (122° ± 6°, 119° ± 7°, and 126° ± 8° in the isolated trochanteric descent, isolated trochanteric apophyseodesis, and nonoperative groups, respectively). There were no differences among the groups in term of the median abductor strength test result: seven of 10 (range 6-8), six of 10 (range 6-8), and six of 10 (range 6-10; p = 0.34).\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSION\\nBecause neither isolated greater trochanteric descent nor greater trochanteric apophyseodesis alone had an effect on hip morphology or abductor strength in children with sequellae of Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease, we conclude these types of extraarticular surgery are ineffective. Therefore, we no longer perform isolated trochanteric descent or apophyseodesis.\\n\\n\\nLEVEL OF EVIDENCE\\nLevel III, therapeutic study.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10465,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research\",\"volume\":\"145 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000000990\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000000990","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:在legg - calv - perthes病引起的髋关节畸形患者中,大转子骨突固定术和孤立性转子下降术旨在预防外展肌无力;问题/目的(1)与未接受手术治疗的儿童相比,Waldenström III期legg - calv - perthes病患儿接受孤立性大转子下降或孤立性大转子骨突成形术是否能改善影像学表现(Stulberg分级或颈轴角)?(2)接受其中一种手术治疗的儿童是否比未接受手术治疗的儿童获得更大的外展肌力量?方法2006 - 2010年间,我们治疗了89例Waldenström III型legg - calv - perthes病(再骨化)患儿。其中,27.9%(12例)行大转子下降术,25.6%(11例)行大转子突起成形术,46.5%(20例)未行手术。在此期间,外科医生根据大转子剩余生长的主观外观来决定是进行骨突成形术还是进行转子下降术。在讨论手术的风险和益处后,由患者家长选择非手术治疗。在大转子下降过程中,将大转子截骨,用两枚7.0 mm螺钉远端固定。在大转子骺端固定术中,在透视下确定骺端,并钻孔生长板的外侧半部分。非手术治疗包括每3至6个月进行一系列临床和影像学评估。所有组的所有儿童均可接受至少6年的随访。大转子下降组、大转子骺端成身术组和对照组的中位随访时间分别为6.6年(6.0-8.2年)、6.5年(6.1-9.2年)和7.4年(6.0-9.1年)。在就诊时,每位患者受影响的髋关节由手术外科医生和一名不参与儿童护理的骨科医生根据Stulberg分类进行分类。每个患者在手术前和最后随访检查时测量颈轴角。外展肌力量由一名儿科骨科研究员和一名物理治疗师在患者侧卧位时进行评估。根据医学研究委员会(Medical Research Council)对评分标准的修改,每位患者的肌肉力量评分范围在0到10分之间,以允许更窄的范围。我们有80%的概率检测到大转子骺端成形术组和非手术治疗组之间颈轴角相差8°。每个队列需要6.8例患者的样本量才能检测到上述终点。结果根据现有数据,我们发现两组患者中Stulberg 2类股骨头的比例没有差异(12例孤立粗隆下降组中有2例,11例孤立粗隆骺端成形术组中有3例,20例未行手术组中有2例;P = 0.46)。同样,在至少6年的随访中,三组之间的颈干角也没有差异(分别在孤立的粗隆下降、孤立的粗隆骺端成形术和非手术组中,颈干角为122°±6°、119°±7°和126°±8°)。组间外展肌中位肌力测试结果无差异:7 / 10(范围6-8),6 / 10(范围6-8),6 / 10(范围6-10;P = 0.34)。结论:单纯的大转子下降和单纯的大转子截骨固定术都不能影响legg - calv - perthes病后遗症患儿的髋关节形态和外展肌力量,因此我们认为这两种关节外手术是无效的。因此,我们不再进行孤立的转子下降或突起成形术。证据等级:III级,治疗性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Isolated Trochanteric Descent and Greater Trochanteric Apophyseodesis Are Not Effective in the Treatment of Post-Perthes Deformity.
BACKGROUND Greater trochanteric apophyseodesis and isolated trochanteric descent seek to prevent abductor weakness in patients with a hip deformity because of Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease; however, no studies have evaluated radiographic findings or abductor strength in children treated with these procedures. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES (1) Do children with Waldenström Stage III Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease treated with either isolated greater trochanteric descent or isolated greater trochanteric apophyseodesis achieve improved radiographic findings (Stulberg classification or neck-shaft angle) compared with those who underwent no surgical treatment? (2) Do children treated with one of those procedures achieve greater abductor strength than those who did not have surgery? METHODS Between 2006 and 2010, we treated 89 children with Waldenström Type III Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease (reossification). Of these, 27.9% (12 patients) underwent greater trochanteric descent, 25.6% (11 patients) underwent greater trochanteric apophyseodesis, and 46.5% (20 patients) did not have surgery. During that time, the decision to perform either apophyseodesis or trochanteric descent was made by the surgeon based on the subjective appearance of remaining growth from the greater trochanter. Nonsurgical management was chosen by the parents of the patients after the risks and benefits of surgery were discussed. During greater trochanteric descent, the greater trochanter was osteotomized and fixed distally with two 7.0-mm screws. During greater trochanteric apophyseodesis, the physis was identified fluoroscopically, and the lateral half of the growth plate was drilled. Nonoperative treatment involved serial clinical and radiographic evaluations every 3 to 6 months. All children in all groups were available for follow-up at a minimum of 6 years. The median follow-up durations for children undergoing greater trochanteric descent, greater trochanteric apophyseodesis, and control cohorts were 6.6 years (range 6.0-8.2 years), 6.5 years (range 6.1-9.2 years), and 7.4 years (range 6.0-9.1 years), respectively. On presentation, each patient's affected hip was classified according to the Stulberg classification by the operating surgeon and an orthopaedic surgeon not involved in the child's care. The neck-shaft angle was measured for each patient before surgery and at the final follow-up examination. Abductor strength was assessed by a pediatric orthopaedic fellow and a physical therapist with the patient in the lateral decubitus position. Each patient was given a muscle strength score on a scale of 0 to 10 points, per a modification of the Medical Research Council scale to allow for a narrower range. We had 80% power to detect an 8° difference in the neck-shaft angle between the greater trochanteric apophyseodesis and nonoperative management cohorts. A sample size of 6.8 patients per cohort would be necessary to detect the above endpoint. RESULTS With the numbers available, we found no differences among the groups in the proportion of patients with Stulberg Class 2 femoral heads (two of 12 patients in the isolated trochanteric descent group, three of 11 in the isolated trochanteric apophyseodesis group, and two of 20 who did not undergo surgery; p = 0.46). Likewise, there were no differences among the three groups in terms of the neck-shaft angle at a minimum of 6 years of follow-up (122° ± 6°, 119° ± 7°, and 126° ± 8° in the isolated trochanteric descent, isolated trochanteric apophyseodesis, and nonoperative groups, respectively). There were no differences among the groups in term of the median abductor strength test result: seven of 10 (range 6-8), six of 10 (range 6-8), and six of 10 (range 6-10; p = 0.34). CONCLUSION Because neither isolated greater trochanteric descent nor greater trochanteric apophyseodesis alone had an effect on hip morphology or abductor strength in children with sequellae of Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease, we conclude these types of extraarticular surgery are ineffective. Therefore, we no longer perform isolated trochanteric descent or apophyseodesis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III, therapeutic study.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信