在黄石国家公园北部,美国黑熊和灰熊对搓树的使用和选择

IF 0.6 4区 生物学 Q4 ZOOLOGY
Ursus Pub Date : 2022-06-07 DOI:10.2192/URSUS-D-21-00009.3
Nathaniel R. Bowersock, Hitomi Okada, Andrea R. Litt, K. Gunther, Frank T. van Manen
{"title":"在黄石国家公园北部,美国黑熊和灰熊对搓树的使用和选择","authors":"Nathaniel R. Bowersock, Hitomi Okada, Andrea R. Litt, K. Gunther, Frank T. van Manen","doi":"10.2192/URSUS-D-21-00009.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Several of the world's bear species exhibit tree-rubbing behavior, which is thought to be a form of scent-marking communication. Many aspects of this behavior remain unexplored, including differences in rub tree selection between sympatric bear species. We compiled rub tree data collected on Yellowstone National Park's Northern Range (USA) and compared rub tree selection of sympatric American black bears (Ursus americanus) and grizzly bears (U. arctos) at local and landscape scales. During 2017 and 2018, we identified 217 rub trees and detected black bears at 117 rub trees and grizzly bears at 18 rub trees, based on genetic analysis of collected hair samples. Rub trees generally were located in areas with gentle slopes and close to existing animal trails. Trees selected by black bears were typically in forested areas, whereas trees selected by grizzly bears were in forested and more open areas. Use of rub trees varied seasonally and between sexes for black bears, but seasonal data were inconclusive for grizzly bears. Black bears showed preferences for certain tree species for rubbing, but we did not find evidence that rub tree selection by grizzly bears differed among tree species. Both bear species selected trees that lacked branches on the lower portions of tree trunks and the maximum rub height was consistent with the body length of the bear species that used the tree. Although the sample size for grizzly bears was small, identifying the species and sex of bears based on genetic analysis enhanced interpretation of rub tree use and selection by bears. Scent-marking by black bears and grizzly bears on similar rub objects in well-traversed areas likely serves to enhance communication within and between the 2 species.","PeriodicalId":49393,"journal":{"name":"Ursus","volume":"117 1","pages":"1 - 12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rub tree use and selection by American black bears and grizzly bears in northern Yellowstone National Park\",\"authors\":\"Nathaniel R. Bowersock, Hitomi Okada, Andrea R. Litt, K. Gunther, Frank T. van Manen\",\"doi\":\"10.2192/URSUS-D-21-00009.3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract: Several of the world's bear species exhibit tree-rubbing behavior, which is thought to be a form of scent-marking communication. Many aspects of this behavior remain unexplored, including differences in rub tree selection between sympatric bear species. We compiled rub tree data collected on Yellowstone National Park's Northern Range (USA) and compared rub tree selection of sympatric American black bears (Ursus americanus) and grizzly bears (U. arctos) at local and landscape scales. During 2017 and 2018, we identified 217 rub trees and detected black bears at 117 rub trees and grizzly bears at 18 rub trees, based on genetic analysis of collected hair samples. Rub trees generally were located in areas with gentle slopes and close to existing animal trails. Trees selected by black bears were typically in forested areas, whereas trees selected by grizzly bears were in forested and more open areas. Use of rub trees varied seasonally and between sexes for black bears, but seasonal data were inconclusive for grizzly bears. Black bears showed preferences for certain tree species for rubbing, but we did not find evidence that rub tree selection by grizzly bears differed among tree species. Both bear species selected trees that lacked branches on the lower portions of tree trunks and the maximum rub height was consistent with the body length of the bear species that used the tree. Although the sample size for grizzly bears was small, identifying the species and sex of bears based on genetic analysis enhanced interpretation of rub tree use and selection by bears. Scent-marking by black bears and grizzly bears on similar rub objects in well-traversed areas likely serves to enhance communication within and between the 2 species.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49393,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ursus\",\"volume\":\"117 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ursus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2192/URSUS-D-21-00009.3\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ZOOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ursus","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2192/URSUS-D-21-00009.3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:世界上一些熊物种表现出摩擦树木的行为,这被认为是一种气味标记交流的形式。这种行为的许多方面仍未被探索,包括同域熊物种之间选择摩擦树的差异。本文收集了美国黄石国家公园北部地区的摩擦树数据,比较了同域美洲黑熊(Ursus americanus)和灰熊(U. arctos)在当地和景观尺度上对摩擦树的选择。在2017年和2018年期间,根据收集的毛发样本的遗传分析,我们鉴定了217棵摩擦树,在117棵摩擦树中检测到黑熊,在18棵摩擦树中检测到灰熊。摩擦树通常位于缓坡地区,靠近现有的动物小径。黑熊选择的树木通常在森林地区,而灰熊选择的树木则在森林和更开阔的地区。黑熊对摩擦树的使用随季节和性别而变化,但对灰熊的季节性数据尚无定论。黑熊表现出对某些树种的摩擦偏好,但我们没有发现灰熊对摩擦树的选择在不同树种之间存在差异的证据。两种熊种都选择树干下部没有树枝的树,最大摩擦高度与使用该树的熊种的体长一致。虽然灰熊的样本量很小,但基于遗传分析确定熊的种类和性别有助于解释熊对摩擦树的使用和选择。黑熊和灰熊在穿越良好的地区的类似摩擦物体上做气味标记,可能是为了加强两个物种内部和之间的交流。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rub tree use and selection by American black bears and grizzly bears in northern Yellowstone National Park
Abstract: Several of the world's bear species exhibit tree-rubbing behavior, which is thought to be a form of scent-marking communication. Many aspects of this behavior remain unexplored, including differences in rub tree selection between sympatric bear species. We compiled rub tree data collected on Yellowstone National Park's Northern Range (USA) and compared rub tree selection of sympatric American black bears (Ursus americanus) and grizzly bears (U. arctos) at local and landscape scales. During 2017 and 2018, we identified 217 rub trees and detected black bears at 117 rub trees and grizzly bears at 18 rub trees, based on genetic analysis of collected hair samples. Rub trees generally were located in areas with gentle slopes and close to existing animal trails. Trees selected by black bears were typically in forested areas, whereas trees selected by grizzly bears were in forested and more open areas. Use of rub trees varied seasonally and between sexes for black bears, but seasonal data were inconclusive for grizzly bears. Black bears showed preferences for certain tree species for rubbing, but we did not find evidence that rub tree selection by grizzly bears differed among tree species. Both bear species selected trees that lacked branches on the lower portions of tree trunks and the maximum rub height was consistent with the body length of the bear species that used the tree. Although the sample size for grizzly bears was small, identifying the species and sex of bears based on genetic analysis enhanced interpretation of rub tree use and selection by bears. Scent-marking by black bears and grizzly bears on similar rub objects in well-traversed areas likely serves to enhance communication within and between the 2 species.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ursus
Ursus 生物-动物学
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
15.40%
发文量
12
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ursus includes a variety of articles on all aspects of bear management and research worldwide. Original manuscripts are welcome. In addition to manuscripts reporting original research, submissions may be based on thoughtful review and synthesis of previously-reported information, innovative philosophies and opinions, and public policy or legal aspects of wildlife conservation. Notes of general interest are also welcome. Invited manuscripts will be clearly identified, but will still be subject to peer review. All manuscripts must be in English. All manuscripts are peer-reviewed, and subject to rigorous editorial standards.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信