{"title":"学习历史和文学的教训:Éric维亚尔的《每日秩序》案例","authors":"Nathan Bracher","doi":"10.2979/HISTMEMO.31.1.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:History has exchanged ideas, themes, techniques and methods with literature throughout its existence, even though the two domains are commonly viewed as entirely distinct, if not incompatible. The debate over the legitimacy and value of literature as opposed to academic history has recently reemerged with the French press’s quasi-unanimous endorsement of Éric Vuillard’s L’Ordre du jour, a bestselling novel focusing on a few select “behind the scenes” aspects of the Anschluss, yet claiming to offer nothing less than the “real truth” of the Nazis’ rise to power. The present article offers a critical analysis of the assumptions and illusions behind the French press’s largely unreflective enthusiasm for Vuillard’s narrative.","PeriodicalId":43327,"journal":{"name":"History & Memory","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Learning the Lessons of History and Literature: The Case of Éric Vuillard’s L’Ordre du jour\",\"authors\":\"Nathan Bracher\",\"doi\":\"10.2979/HISTMEMO.31.1.0003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:History has exchanged ideas, themes, techniques and methods with literature throughout its existence, even though the two domains are commonly viewed as entirely distinct, if not incompatible. The debate over the legitimacy and value of literature as opposed to academic history has recently reemerged with the French press’s quasi-unanimous endorsement of Éric Vuillard’s L’Ordre du jour, a bestselling novel focusing on a few select “behind the scenes” aspects of the Anschluss, yet claiming to offer nothing less than the “real truth” of the Nazis’ rise to power. The present article offers a critical analysis of the assumptions and illusions behind the French press’s largely unreflective enthusiasm for Vuillard’s narrative.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43327,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"History & Memory\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"History & Memory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2979/HISTMEMO.31.1.0003\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History & Memory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2979/HISTMEMO.31.1.0003","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要:历史与文学在思想、主题、技术和方法等方面进行了交流,尽管这两个领域通常被认为是完全不同的,甚至是不相容的。最近,法国媒体近乎一致地认可了Éric维亚尔的《每日秩序》(L’ordre du jour),这是一本畅销书,专注于德国吞并的几个“幕后”方面,但声称它提供了纳粹崛起的“真实真相”,这再次引发了关于文学的合法性和价值的争论。本文批判性地分析了法国媒体对维亚尔叙事毫无反思的热情背后的假设和幻想。
Learning the Lessons of History and Literature: The Case of Éric Vuillard’s L’Ordre du jour
Abstract:History has exchanged ideas, themes, techniques and methods with literature throughout its existence, even though the two domains are commonly viewed as entirely distinct, if not incompatible. The debate over the legitimacy and value of literature as opposed to academic history has recently reemerged with the French press’s quasi-unanimous endorsement of Éric Vuillard’s L’Ordre du jour, a bestselling novel focusing on a few select “behind the scenes” aspects of the Anschluss, yet claiming to offer nothing less than the “real truth” of the Nazis’ rise to power. The present article offers a critical analysis of the assumptions and illusions behind the French press’s largely unreflective enthusiasm for Vuillard’s narrative.