我们谈论我们现在的教学方式

A. Anderson
{"title":"我们谈论我们现在的教学方式","authors":"A. Anderson","doi":"10.1632/PROF.2009.2009.1.19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, I consider the question of teaching in the light of the crisis in the humanities. This crisis comprehends not only the threatened situ ation of the humanities in terms of resources and cultural value but also the related problem of the seeming abstruseness of humanities scholarship relative to the aesthetic values and experiences of the broader public. In this context, discussions of pedagogy tend to be inherently justificatory for the discipline?that is, discussions of how we teach, far more than discus sions of how we do our scholarship, heighten and focus the question of how we explain what we do and why it matters. Conversely, justifications of the discipline tend to require, at some point, a discussion of teaching. That is, explaining the importance of what we do is typically seen to re","PeriodicalId":86631,"journal":{"name":"The Osteopathic profession","volume":"59 1","pages":"19-27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Way We Talk about the Way We Teach Now\",\"authors\":\"A. Anderson\",\"doi\":\"10.1632/PROF.2009.2009.1.19\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, I consider the question of teaching in the light of the crisis in the humanities. This crisis comprehends not only the threatened situ ation of the humanities in terms of resources and cultural value but also the related problem of the seeming abstruseness of humanities scholarship relative to the aesthetic values and experiences of the broader public. In this context, discussions of pedagogy tend to be inherently justificatory for the discipline?that is, discussions of how we teach, far more than discus sions of how we do our scholarship, heighten and focus the question of how we explain what we do and why it matters. Conversely, justifications of the discipline tend to require, at some point, a discussion of teaching. That is, explaining the importance of what we do is typically seen to re\",\"PeriodicalId\":86631,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Osteopathic profession\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"19-27\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Osteopathic profession\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1632/PROF.2009.2009.1.19\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Osteopathic profession","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1632/PROF.2009.2009.1.19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

在本文中,我从人文学科危机的角度来思考教学问题。这一危机不仅反映了人文学科在资源和文化价值方面受到威胁的处境,而且还反映了与更广泛公众的审美价值和经验相比,人文学科看似深奥的相关问题。在这种背景下,关于教育学的讨论倾向于为这门学科辩护。也就是说,关于我们如何教学的讨论,远远多于关于我们如何开展学术研究的讨论,它突出并聚焦于我们如何解释我们所做的事情以及它为什么重要的问题。相反,在某种程度上,学科的论证往往需要对教学进行讨论。也就是说,解释我们所做的事情的重要性通常被认为是错误的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Way We Talk about the Way We Teach Now
In this paper, I consider the question of teaching in the light of the crisis in the humanities. This crisis comprehends not only the threatened situ ation of the humanities in terms of resources and cultural value but also the related problem of the seeming abstruseness of humanities scholarship relative to the aesthetic values and experiences of the broader public. In this context, discussions of pedagogy tend to be inherently justificatory for the discipline?that is, discussions of how we teach, far more than discus sions of how we do our scholarship, heighten and focus the question of how we explain what we do and why it matters. Conversely, justifications of the discipline tend to require, at some point, a discussion of teaching. That is, explaining the importance of what we do is typically seen to re
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信