追踪特拉斯科特1996年有争议的关于语法纠正的论文的影响:文献计量学分析

Q4 Arts and Humanities

Brazilian English Language Teaching Journal Pub Date : 2023-06-08 DOI:10.5539/elt.v16n7p1

Jiun-Iung Lei

{"title":"追踪特拉斯科特1996年有争议的关于语法纠正的论文的影响:文献计量学分析","authors":"Jiun-Iung Lei","doi":"10.5539/elt.v16n7p1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Notwithstanding Truscott's 1996 review article sparked the grammatical correction debate, no earlier bibliometric analysis has focused on the publications that cited it. This study aimed to determine the degree to which publications citing Truscott's 1996 study had evolved and to give a conceptual framework for 427 papers. This study used two bibliometric programs, HistCite Pro and VOSviewer, to evaluate and display the data. The results visualized that the pro-correction side has prevailed and is influential in L2 writing practices.","PeriodicalId":30319,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian English Language Teaching Journal","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tracing the Impact of Truscott's Controversial 1996 Paper on Grammar Correction: A Bibliometric Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Jiun-Iung Lei\",\"doi\":\"10.5539/elt.v16n7p1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Notwithstanding Truscott's 1996 review article sparked the grammatical correction debate, no earlier bibliometric analysis has focused on the publications that cited it. This study aimed to determine the degree to which publications citing Truscott's 1996 study had evolved and to give a conceptual framework for 427 papers. This study used two bibliometric programs, HistCite Pro and VOSviewer, to evaluate and display the data. The results visualized that the pro-correction side has prevailed and is influential in L2 writing practices.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30319,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brazilian English Language Teaching Journal\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brazilian English Language Teaching Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v16n7p1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian English Language Teaching Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v16n7p1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管特拉斯科特1996年的评论文章引发了关于语法纠正的争论，但此前没有文献计量学分析关注过引用该文章的出版物。本研究旨在确定引用Truscott 1996年研究的出版物的发展程度，并为427篇论文提供一个概念框架。本研究使用两个文献计量程序HistCite Pro和VOSviewer来评估和显示数据。结果显示，支持更正的一方在二语写作实践中占了上风，并具有影响力。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Tracing the Impact of Truscott's Controversial 1996 Paper on Grammar Correction: A Bibliometric Analysis

Notwithstanding Truscott's 1996 review article sparked the grammatical correction debate, no earlier bibliometric analysis has focused on the publications that cited it. This study aimed to determine the degree to which publications citing Truscott's 1996 study had evolved and to give a conceptual framework for 427 papers. This study used two bibliometric programs, HistCite Pro and VOSviewer, to evaluate and display the data. The results visualized that the pro-correction side has prevailed and is influential in L2 writing practices.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Brazilian English Language Teaching Journal Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language

CiteScore

0.20

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

10 weeks