卫生工作者和不同人群对疫苗接种的承诺

Q4 Medicine
D. V. Sutovskaya, Polina A. Pyzhyanova, Ekaterina V. Gabdullina, Anastasia A. Makunts, Anna V. Kuzmenko
{"title":"卫生工作者和不同人群对疫苗接种的承诺","authors":"D. V. Sutovskaya, Polina A. Pyzhyanova, Ekaterina V. Gabdullina, Anastasia A. Makunts, Anna V. Kuzmenko","doi":"10.46563/1560-9561-2023-26-3-205-211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The relatively stable incidence of most controlled infections shifts the focus of public attention from the need for vaccination to the likelihood of post-vaccination complications. \nAim. To examine the adherence of various population groups and health workers to vaccine prophylaxis and analyze the reasons for anti-vaccination scepticism. \nMaterials and methods. A survey was conducted on the attitudes towards vaccination among one thousand nine hundred thirty nine respondents including 485 doctors of various specialties (163 pediatricians, 86 surgeons, 85 obstetricians-gynecologists, 76 neurologists, 75 neonatologists), 117 nurses, 295 parents, 1042 students. The significance of differences was assessed using Student’s t-test. \nResults. An insufficient level of adherence to vaccine prophylaxis has been established: 43.1% of parents vaccinate their children selectively, 35.4% according to the national calendar, 17.1% refuse categorically, and 4.4% have a medical refusal. The main reason for refusal is fear of complications (30%). Less than half receive information from health workers (45.6%), the main source being the media (49.1%). Among health workers, adherence to vaccine prophylaxis is highest among pediatricians (86.1%), significantly lower among neurologists (35.6%), surgeons (43.7%), obstetricians-gynecologists (62.6%), nurses (79.5%). The main reason for distrust of vaccination is fear of post-vaccination complications, narrow specialists more often choose the answer “better to get sick”. Among medical university students there is a significantly higher adherence among senior students in paediatrics (63.6%) compared to students in undergraduate (40.8%) and medical school (48.8%). However, 5% of those surveyed do not plan to vaccinate their children in the future. Polytechnic students have a more negative attitude towards vaccination accounted for only 36.4% vaccinated according to the National Calendar and 30% do not plan to vaccinate their children in the future. \nConclusion. There is a clear need for additional training programs on vaccination to raise the awareness of health care workers on this issue, which will provide a strong rationale for the importance of immunization to patients and their parents.","PeriodicalId":52396,"journal":{"name":"Russian Journal of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Commitment of health workers and various population groups to vaccination\",\"authors\":\"D. V. Sutovskaya, Polina A. Pyzhyanova, Ekaterina V. Gabdullina, Anastasia A. Makunts, Anna V. Kuzmenko\",\"doi\":\"10.46563/1560-9561-2023-26-3-205-211\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction. The relatively stable incidence of most controlled infections shifts the focus of public attention from the need for vaccination to the likelihood of post-vaccination complications. \\nAim. To examine the adherence of various population groups and health workers to vaccine prophylaxis and analyze the reasons for anti-vaccination scepticism. \\nMaterials and methods. A survey was conducted on the attitudes towards vaccination among one thousand nine hundred thirty nine respondents including 485 doctors of various specialties (163 pediatricians, 86 surgeons, 85 obstetricians-gynecologists, 76 neurologists, 75 neonatologists), 117 nurses, 295 parents, 1042 students. The significance of differences was assessed using Student’s t-test. \\nResults. An insufficient level of adherence to vaccine prophylaxis has been established: 43.1% of parents vaccinate their children selectively, 35.4% according to the national calendar, 17.1% refuse categorically, and 4.4% have a medical refusal. The main reason for refusal is fear of complications (30%). Less than half receive information from health workers (45.6%), the main source being the media (49.1%). Among health workers, adherence to vaccine prophylaxis is highest among pediatricians (86.1%), significantly lower among neurologists (35.6%), surgeons (43.7%), obstetricians-gynecologists (62.6%), nurses (79.5%). The main reason for distrust of vaccination is fear of post-vaccination complications, narrow specialists more often choose the answer “better to get sick”. Among medical university students there is a significantly higher adherence among senior students in paediatrics (63.6%) compared to students in undergraduate (40.8%) and medical school (48.8%). However, 5% of those surveyed do not plan to vaccinate their children in the future. Polytechnic students have a more negative attitude towards vaccination accounted for only 36.4% vaccinated according to the National Calendar and 30% do not plan to vaccinate their children in the future. \\nConclusion. There is a clear need for additional training programs on vaccination to raise the awareness of health care workers on this issue, which will provide a strong rationale for the importance of immunization to patients and their parents.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52396,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Russian Journal of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Russian Journal of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46563/1560-9561-2023-26-3-205-211\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian Journal of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46563/1560-9561-2023-26-3-205-211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

介绍。大多数受控制感染的发病率相对稳定,使公众的注意力从接种疫苗的必要性转移到疫苗接种后并发症的可能性上。的目标。检查不同人群和卫生工作者对疫苗预防的依从性,并分析反疫苗接种怀疑的原因。材料和方法。对各专科485名医生(163名儿科医生、86名外科医生、85名妇产科医生、76名神经科医生、75名新生儿科医生)、117名护士、295名家长、1042名学生进行疫苗接种态度调查。差异的显著性采用学生t检验。结果。已确定对疫苗预防的坚持程度不足:43.1%的父母有选择地为子女接种疫苗,35.4%根据国家日历接种,17.1%断然拒绝接种,4.4%因医疗原因拒绝接种。拒绝的主要原因是害怕并发症(30%)。不到一半的人(45.6%)从卫生工作者那里获得信息,主要来源是媒体(49.1%)。在卫生工作者中,坚持接种疫苗的比例在儿科医生中最高(86.1%),在神经科医生(35.6%)、外科医生(43.7%)、妇产科医生(62.6%)和护士(79.5%)中明显较低。不信任疫苗接种的主要原因是害怕疫苗接种后的并发症,狭隘的专家往往选择“最好生病”的答案。在医科大学学生中,儿科高年级学生(63.6%)的依从性明显高于本科学生(40.8%)和医学院学生(48.8%)。然而,5%的受访者不打算将来给孩子接种疫苗。职业技术学院学生对疫苗接种的态度较为消极,仅占36.4%的人根据国家日历接种疫苗,30%的人不打算将来给孩子接种疫苗。结论。显然需要额外的疫苗接种培训方案,以提高卫生保健工作者对这一问题的认识,这将为免疫接种对患者及其父母的重要性提供强有力的理由。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Commitment of health workers and various population groups to vaccination
Introduction. The relatively stable incidence of most controlled infections shifts the focus of public attention from the need for vaccination to the likelihood of post-vaccination complications. Aim. To examine the adherence of various population groups and health workers to vaccine prophylaxis and analyze the reasons for anti-vaccination scepticism. Materials and methods. A survey was conducted on the attitudes towards vaccination among one thousand nine hundred thirty nine respondents including 485 doctors of various specialties (163 pediatricians, 86 surgeons, 85 obstetricians-gynecologists, 76 neurologists, 75 neonatologists), 117 nurses, 295 parents, 1042 students. The significance of differences was assessed using Student’s t-test. Results. An insufficient level of adherence to vaccine prophylaxis has been established: 43.1% of parents vaccinate their children selectively, 35.4% according to the national calendar, 17.1% refuse categorically, and 4.4% have a medical refusal. The main reason for refusal is fear of complications (30%). Less than half receive information from health workers (45.6%), the main source being the media (49.1%). Among health workers, adherence to vaccine prophylaxis is highest among pediatricians (86.1%), significantly lower among neurologists (35.6%), surgeons (43.7%), obstetricians-gynecologists (62.6%), nurses (79.5%). The main reason for distrust of vaccination is fear of post-vaccination complications, narrow specialists more often choose the answer “better to get sick”. Among medical university students there is a significantly higher adherence among senior students in paediatrics (63.6%) compared to students in undergraduate (40.8%) and medical school (48.8%). However, 5% of those surveyed do not plan to vaccinate their children in the future. Polytechnic students have a more negative attitude towards vaccination accounted for only 36.4% vaccinated according to the National Calendar and 30% do not plan to vaccinate their children in the future. Conclusion. There is a clear need for additional training programs on vaccination to raise the awareness of health care workers on this issue, which will provide a strong rationale for the importance of immunization to patients and their parents.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Russian Journal of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology
Russian Journal of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信