蒸汽-溶剂法:降低油砂原位开采排放的游戏规则改变者

M. Chowdhuri, Alex Filstein, Haibo Huang
{"title":"蒸汽-溶剂法:降低油砂原位开采排放的游戏规则改变者","authors":"M. Chowdhuri, Alex Filstein, Haibo Huang","doi":"10.2118/208966-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Due to extensive energy requirements and the volume of emitted greenhouse gases associated with burning natural gas to generate steam in the SAGD process, there has been always a strong motivation to develop oil recovery processes for bitumen reservoirs with lower energy and emissions intensities. A hybrid steam-solvent co-injection process, which is to synergize the advantages of both SAGD and VAPEX processes and minimize their drawbacks is the subject of ongoing research and field piloting since early 2000. Most of the past efforts of the steam-solvent process were primarily focused on improving the oil rate or improving the process's economic benefits. However, due to Canada's ambitious greenhouse emission reduction target (net zero emission by 2050) along with the significant increase of carbon tax ($170 by 2030), the primary focus of the oil industry is shifting towards reducing steam injection and cutting the GHG emission drastically. This study revisited the steam-solvent process to find a suitable combination of solvent type and operating strategies that can reduce the steam injection and GHG emission significantly, and without significantly compromising the oil production. Two hydrocarbon pure solvents, propane and butane were recommended in this project to cut the steam injection drastically and without having a significant negative impact on the oil production. Among the two solvents, butane may be preferred. However, to reduce the cost further and cut energy input, propane may be a better choice than butane. Propane is cheaper than butane and it requires less energy to vaporize propane. The process should start with steam-only injection (as SAGD) and next inject solvent after the chamber is somewhat developed. The solvent may not be effective if the oil production is already in the natural decline stage. At later stages, the solvent retention in the reservoir could also be high. During the solvent injection period, a small amount of steam could be continuously injected with the solvent or steam could be intermittently injected as needed to keep enough energy in the reservoir. This will help to vaporize the solvent and prevent the chamber from being cooled down significantly.","PeriodicalId":11077,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Thu, March 17, 2022","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Steam-Solvent Process: A Gamechanger in Cutting Emissions in In-Situ Recovery of Oil Sands\",\"authors\":\"M. Chowdhuri, Alex Filstein, Haibo Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/208966-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Due to extensive energy requirements and the volume of emitted greenhouse gases associated with burning natural gas to generate steam in the SAGD process, there has been always a strong motivation to develop oil recovery processes for bitumen reservoirs with lower energy and emissions intensities. A hybrid steam-solvent co-injection process, which is to synergize the advantages of both SAGD and VAPEX processes and minimize their drawbacks is the subject of ongoing research and field piloting since early 2000. Most of the past efforts of the steam-solvent process were primarily focused on improving the oil rate or improving the process's economic benefits. However, due to Canada's ambitious greenhouse emission reduction target (net zero emission by 2050) along with the significant increase of carbon tax ($170 by 2030), the primary focus of the oil industry is shifting towards reducing steam injection and cutting the GHG emission drastically. This study revisited the steam-solvent process to find a suitable combination of solvent type and operating strategies that can reduce the steam injection and GHG emission significantly, and without significantly compromising the oil production. Two hydrocarbon pure solvents, propane and butane were recommended in this project to cut the steam injection drastically and without having a significant negative impact on the oil production. Among the two solvents, butane may be preferred. However, to reduce the cost further and cut energy input, propane may be a better choice than butane. Propane is cheaper than butane and it requires less energy to vaporize propane. The process should start with steam-only injection (as SAGD) and next inject solvent after the chamber is somewhat developed. The solvent may not be effective if the oil production is already in the natural decline stage. At later stages, the solvent retention in the reservoir could also be high. During the solvent injection period, a small amount of steam could be continuously injected with the solvent or steam could be intermittently injected as needed to keep enough energy in the reservoir. This will help to vaporize the solvent and prevent the chamber from being cooled down significantly.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11077,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 2 Thu, March 17, 2022\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 2 Thu, March 17, 2022\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/208966-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Thu, March 17, 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/208966-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于在SAGD过程中大量的能源需求和与燃烧天然气产生蒸汽相关的温室气体排放量,因此一直有强烈的动机开发能源和排放强度较低的沥青油藏采油工艺。自2000年初以来,蒸汽-溶剂混合共注入工艺一直在进行研究和现场试验,该工艺可以协同SAGD和VAPEX工艺的优点,并最大限度地减少它们的缺点。以往对蒸汽溶剂法的研究大都集中在提高出油率或提高工艺的经济效益上。然而,由于加拿大雄心勃勃的温室气体减排目标(到2050年实现净零排放)以及碳税的大幅增加(到2030年达到170美元),石油行业的主要重点正在转向减少蒸汽注入和大幅减少温室气体排放。本研究重新研究了蒸汽-溶剂工艺,以找到一种合适的溶剂类型和操作策略的组合,可以显著减少蒸汽注入和温室气体排放,同时不会显著影响石油产量。在该项目中,推荐使用丙烷和丁烷两种碳氢化合物纯溶剂,以大幅减少注汽量,同时不会对石油产量产生明显的负面影响。在这两种溶剂中,丁烷可能是优选的。然而,为了进一步降低成本和减少能源投入,丙烷可能是比丁烷更好的选择。丙烷比丁烷便宜,汽化丙烷所需的能量也更少。该工艺应该从蒸汽喷射开始(如SAGD),然后在腔室稍微发达后注入溶剂。如果原油产量已经处于自然下降阶段,溶剂可能就不起作用了。在后期阶段,储层中的溶剂保留率也可能很高。注溶剂期间,可根据需要连续注入少量蒸汽或间歇注入蒸汽,以保证储层有足够的能量。这将有助于蒸发溶剂,防止腔体明显冷却。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Steam-Solvent Process: A Gamechanger in Cutting Emissions in In-Situ Recovery of Oil Sands
Due to extensive energy requirements and the volume of emitted greenhouse gases associated with burning natural gas to generate steam in the SAGD process, there has been always a strong motivation to develop oil recovery processes for bitumen reservoirs with lower energy and emissions intensities. A hybrid steam-solvent co-injection process, which is to synergize the advantages of both SAGD and VAPEX processes and minimize their drawbacks is the subject of ongoing research and field piloting since early 2000. Most of the past efforts of the steam-solvent process were primarily focused on improving the oil rate or improving the process's economic benefits. However, due to Canada's ambitious greenhouse emission reduction target (net zero emission by 2050) along with the significant increase of carbon tax ($170 by 2030), the primary focus of the oil industry is shifting towards reducing steam injection and cutting the GHG emission drastically. This study revisited the steam-solvent process to find a suitable combination of solvent type and operating strategies that can reduce the steam injection and GHG emission significantly, and without significantly compromising the oil production. Two hydrocarbon pure solvents, propane and butane were recommended in this project to cut the steam injection drastically and without having a significant negative impact on the oil production. Among the two solvents, butane may be preferred. However, to reduce the cost further and cut energy input, propane may be a better choice than butane. Propane is cheaper than butane and it requires less energy to vaporize propane. The process should start with steam-only injection (as SAGD) and next inject solvent after the chamber is somewhat developed. The solvent may not be effective if the oil production is already in the natural decline stage. At later stages, the solvent retention in the reservoir could also be high. During the solvent injection period, a small amount of steam could be continuously injected with the solvent or steam could be intermittently injected as needed to keep enough energy in the reservoir. This will help to vaporize the solvent and prevent the chamber from being cooled down significantly.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信