液体等电聚焦-一维无孔二氧化硅反相液相色谱-电喷雾电离飞行时间质谱法与液体等电聚焦-一维十二烷基硫酸钠聚丙烯酰胺凝胶电泳质谱图分析完整蛋白质分子质量的能力比较

Daniel B Wall, Stephen J Parus, David M Lubman
{"title":"液体等电聚焦-一维无孔二氧化硅反相液相色谱-电喷雾电离飞行时间质谱法与液体等电聚焦-一维十二烷基硫酸钠聚丙烯酰胺凝胶电泳质谱图分析完整蛋白质分子质量的能力比较","authors":"Daniel B Wall,&nbsp;Stephen J Parus,&nbsp;David M Lubman","doi":"10.1016/S0378-4347(01)00382-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Nonporous silica reversed-phase HPLC coupled to electrospray ionization with on-line time-of-flight mass spectrometric detection (NPS-RP-HPLC–ESI-TOF-MS) is shown to be an effective liquid phase method for obtaining the molecular masses of proteins from pH fractionated cellular lysates where the method is capable of generating the same banding patterns typically observed using gel phase one-dimensional sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. The liquid-phase mass spectrometry-based method provides a mass accuracy of at least 150 ppm, with 4000 mass resolution and provides improved sensitivity as the protein molecular mass (MW) decreases. The liquid and gel phase methods are shown to be complementary in terms of their mass range but the liquid phase method has the advantage over the gel method in that the analysis times are 50 times shorter, the mass accuracy is 70 times better and the resolution is 130 times higher. The liquid phase method is shown to be more effective for detection of proteins below 40 kDa, while the gel phase separation can access many more proteins, including more hydrophobic proteins, at increasing MW.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15463,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chromatography B: Biomedical Sciences and Applications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0378-4347(01)00382-6","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the capabilities of liquid isoelectric focusing–one-dimensional nonporous silica reversed-phase liquid chromatography–electrospray ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry and liquid isoelectric focusing–one-dimensional sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis mass mapping for the analysis of intact protein molecular masses\",\"authors\":\"Daniel B Wall,&nbsp;Stephen J Parus,&nbsp;David M Lubman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0378-4347(01)00382-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Nonporous silica reversed-phase HPLC coupled to electrospray ionization with on-line time-of-flight mass spectrometric detection (NPS-RP-HPLC–ESI-TOF-MS) is shown to be an effective liquid phase method for obtaining the molecular masses of proteins from pH fractionated cellular lysates where the method is capable of generating the same banding patterns typically observed using gel phase one-dimensional sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. The liquid-phase mass spectrometry-based method provides a mass accuracy of at least 150 ppm, with 4000 mass resolution and provides improved sensitivity as the protein molecular mass (MW) decreases. The liquid and gel phase methods are shown to be complementary in terms of their mass range but the liquid phase method has the advantage over the gel method in that the analysis times are 50 times shorter, the mass accuracy is 70 times better and the resolution is 130 times higher. The liquid phase method is shown to be more effective for detection of proteins below 40 kDa, while the gel phase separation can access many more proteins, including more hydrophobic proteins, at increasing MW.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15463,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Chromatography B: Biomedical Sciences and Applications\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0378-4347(01)00382-6\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Chromatography B: Biomedical Sciences and Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378434701003826\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chromatography B: Biomedical Sciences and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378434701003826","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

无孔二氧化硅反相高效液相色谱耦合电喷雾电离在线飞行时间质谱检测(NPS-RP-HPLC-ESI-TOF-MS)被证明是一种有效的液相方法,用于从pH分离的细胞裂解物中获得蛋白质的分子质量,该方法能够产生通常使用凝胶相一维十二烷基硫酸钠-聚丙烯酰胺凝胶电泳观察到的相同条带模式。基于液相质谱的方法提供了至少150 ppm的质量精度,具有4000质量分辨率,并且随着蛋白质分子质量(MW)的降低提供了更高的灵敏度。液相法和凝胶法在质量范围上是互补的,但液相法比凝胶法的优势在于分析时间缩短了50倍,质量精度提高了70倍,分辨率提高了130倍。液相法对于检测40 kDa以下的蛋白质更有效,而凝胶相分离可以在增加分子量时获得更多的蛋白质,包括更多的疏水蛋白质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of the capabilities of liquid isoelectric focusing–one-dimensional nonporous silica reversed-phase liquid chromatography–electrospray ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry and liquid isoelectric focusing–one-dimensional sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis mass mapping for the analysis of intact protein molecular masses

Nonporous silica reversed-phase HPLC coupled to electrospray ionization with on-line time-of-flight mass spectrometric detection (NPS-RP-HPLC–ESI-TOF-MS) is shown to be an effective liquid phase method for obtaining the molecular masses of proteins from pH fractionated cellular lysates where the method is capable of generating the same banding patterns typically observed using gel phase one-dimensional sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. The liquid-phase mass spectrometry-based method provides a mass accuracy of at least 150 ppm, with 4000 mass resolution and provides improved sensitivity as the protein molecular mass (MW) decreases. The liquid and gel phase methods are shown to be complementary in terms of their mass range but the liquid phase method has the advantage over the gel method in that the analysis times are 50 times shorter, the mass accuracy is 70 times better and the resolution is 130 times higher. The liquid phase method is shown to be more effective for detection of proteins below 40 kDa, while the gel phase separation can access many more proteins, including more hydrophobic proteins, at increasing MW.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信