爱尔兰手语词频分析

Q2 Arts and Humanities
Teanga Pub Date : 2020-09-24 DOI:10.35903/TEANGA.V11I1.162
Robert G. Smith, M. Hofmann
{"title":"爱尔兰手语词频分析","authors":"Robert G. Smith, M. Hofmann","doi":"10.35903/TEANGA.V11I1.162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Word frequency has a significant impact on language acquisition and fluency. It is often a point of reference for the teaching and assessing of a language and indeed, as a control for psycholinguistic studies. This paper presents the results of the first objective frequency analysis of lexical tokens from the Signs of Ireland corpus. We investigate the frequency of fully lexical, partly lexical and non-lexical signs in Irish Sign Language as they are presented in the corpus. We confirm the accuracy of the lexical gloss frequency data with a supplementary corpus subset that is tagged for grammatical class and additional insights from previous lexical frequency studies conducted for American Sign Language, Australian Sign Language, British Sign Language and New Zealand Sign Language. This approach has informed us that signers who learn the 100 most frequent signs in Irish Sign Language, will know a third of the language’s vocabulary. This study has found that, in the main, frequency statistics from Irish Sign Language are in line with previous studies and that the text type and annotation strategy can significantly impact results. We found that, without a formalised lexicon, lexical glosses fell short of the requirements for a lexical frequency analysis. However, supported by grammatical class data, frequency data may be reported for symbolic units.","PeriodicalId":36036,"journal":{"name":"Teanga","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lexical Frequency Analysis of Irish Sign Language\",\"authors\":\"Robert G. Smith, M. Hofmann\",\"doi\":\"10.35903/TEANGA.V11I1.162\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Word frequency has a significant impact on language acquisition and fluency. It is often a point of reference for the teaching and assessing of a language and indeed, as a control for psycholinguistic studies. This paper presents the results of the first objective frequency analysis of lexical tokens from the Signs of Ireland corpus. We investigate the frequency of fully lexical, partly lexical and non-lexical signs in Irish Sign Language as they are presented in the corpus. We confirm the accuracy of the lexical gloss frequency data with a supplementary corpus subset that is tagged for grammatical class and additional insights from previous lexical frequency studies conducted for American Sign Language, Australian Sign Language, British Sign Language and New Zealand Sign Language. This approach has informed us that signers who learn the 100 most frequent signs in Irish Sign Language, will know a third of the language’s vocabulary. This study has found that, in the main, frequency statistics from Irish Sign Language are in line with previous studies and that the text type and annotation strategy can significantly impact results. We found that, without a formalised lexicon, lexical glosses fell short of the requirements for a lexical frequency analysis. However, supported by grammatical class data, frequency data may be reported for symbolic units.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36036,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Teanga\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Teanga\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35903/TEANGA.V11I1.162\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teanga","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35903/TEANGA.V11I1.162","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

词频对语言习得和流利程度有重要影响。它通常是语言教学和评估的一个参考点,实际上,作为心理语言学研究的一个控制。本文对《爱尔兰语料库》中的词汇符号进行了首次客观频率分析。我们调查了在语料库中出现的爱尔兰手语中完全词汇符号、部分词汇符号和非词汇符号的频率。我们通过一个补充语料库子集确认了词汇光泽频率数据的准确性,该语料库子集被标记为语法类,并从先前对美国手语、澳大利亚手语、英国手语和新西兰手语进行的词汇频率研究中获得了额外的见解。这种方法告诉我们,掌握了爱尔兰手语中最常见的100个手势的人,将掌握该语言三分之一的词汇。本研究发现,爱尔兰手语的频率统计数据与以往的研究基本一致,文本类型和注释策略对结果有显著影响。我们发现,如果没有形式化的词典,词汇注释就无法满足词汇频率分析的要求。然而,在语法类数据的支持下,符号单位可以报告频率数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lexical Frequency Analysis of Irish Sign Language
Word frequency has a significant impact on language acquisition and fluency. It is often a point of reference for the teaching and assessing of a language and indeed, as a control for psycholinguistic studies. This paper presents the results of the first objective frequency analysis of lexical tokens from the Signs of Ireland corpus. We investigate the frequency of fully lexical, partly lexical and non-lexical signs in Irish Sign Language as they are presented in the corpus. We confirm the accuracy of the lexical gloss frequency data with a supplementary corpus subset that is tagged for grammatical class and additional insights from previous lexical frequency studies conducted for American Sign Language, Australian Sign Language, British Sign Language and New Zealand Sign Language. This approach has informed us that signers who learn the 100 most frequent signs in Irish Sign Language, will know a third of the language’s vocabulary. This study has found that, in the main, frequency statistics from Irish Sign Language are in line with previous studies and that the text type and annotation strategy can significantly impact results. We found that, without a formalised lexicon, lexical glosses fell short of the requirements for a lexical frequency analysis. However, supported by grammatical class data, frequency data may be reported for symbolic units.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Teanga
Teanga Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
26 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信