金融风险的极值模型与菲律宾股票之应用

Velasco Aaf, Lapuz Dkp
{"title":"金融风险的极值模型与菲律宾股票之应用","authors":"Velasco Aaf, Lapuz Dkp","doi":"10.4172/2168-9679.1000404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Extreme value theory (EVT) provides techniques for estimating models that predict events occurring at extremely low probabilities. In this paper, Peaks Over Threshold (POT) method of Extreme Value Theory was utilized. A conditional approach of the EVT was applied with the aid of ARMA-GARCH models to correct for the effects of autocorrelation and conditional heteroscedastic terms. Maximum likelihood estimates of model parameters for the fitted Generalized Pareto Distribution (GPD) were computed. These techniques were applied to the daily returns of Bangko de Oro, Mega World Corporation, Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, SM Investments Corporation, and Universal Robina Corporation. A comparison of value at risk (VaR) estimates showed that as becomes smaller, VaR estimates under normal distribution tend to underestimate VaR while estimates under EVT approaches the empirical results. Backtesting using the Basel Committee three-zone approach to assess the accuracy of VaR models reveal that VaR models under normality are not able to capture extreme returns and therefore underestimate tail risk while VaR models under EVT have high probability of model accuracy.","PeriodicalId":15007,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied and Computational Mathematics","volume":"58 1","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Extreme Value Modelling for Measuring Financial Risk with Application to Selected Philippine Stocks\",\"authors\":\"Velasco Aaf, Lapuz Dkp\",\"doi\":\"10.4172/2168-9679.1000404\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Extreme value theory (EVT) provides techniques for estimating models that predict events occurring at extremely low probabilities. In this paper, Peaks Over Threshold (POT) method of Extreme Value Theory was utilized. A conditional approach of the EVT was applied with the aid of ARMA-GARCH models to correct for the effects of autocorrelation and conditional heteroscedastic terms. Maximum likelihood estimates of model parameters for the fitted Generalized Pareto Distribution (GPD) were computed. These techniques were applied to the daily returns of Bangko de Oro, Mega World Corporation, Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, SM Investments Corporation, and Universal Robina Corporation. A comparison of value at risk (VaR) estimates showed that as becomes smaller, VaR estimates under normal distribution tend to underestimate VaR while estimates under EVT approaches the empirical results. Backtesting using the Basel Committee three-zone approach to assess the accuracy of VaR models reveal that VaR models under normality are not able to capture extreme returns and therefore underestimate tail risk while VaR models under EVT have high probability of model accuracy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15007,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied and Computational Mathematics\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"1-13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied and Computational Mathematics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4172/2168-9679.1000404\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied and Computational Mathematics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2168-9679.1000404","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

极值理论(EVT)为预测极低概率事件的模型提供了估计技术。本文利用极值理论中的阈值峰值(POT)方法。在ARMA-GARCH模型的帮助下,采用EVT的条件方法来校正自相关项和条件异方差项的影响。计算了拟合广义帕累托分布(GPD)模型参数的最大似然估计。这些技术应用于Bangko de Oro、Mega World Corporation、Semirara Mining and Power Corporation、SM Investments Corporation和Universal Robina Corporation的日收益。风险值(VaR)估计值的比较表明,随着VaR估计值变小,正态分布下的VaR估计值趋于低估,而EVT下的VaR估计值趋于实证结果。使用巴塞尔委员会三区方法对VaR模型的准确性进行回测,结果表明,正态状态下的VaR模型无法捕捉到极端收益,因此低估了尾部风险,而EVT下的VaR模型具有较高的模型准确性概率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Extreme Value Modelling for Measuring Financial Risk with Application to Selected Philippine Stocks
Extreme value theory (EVT) provides techniques for estimating models that predict events occurring at extremely low probabilities. In this paper, Peaks Over Threshold (POT) method of Extreme Value Theory was utilized. A conditional approach of the EVT was applied with the aid of ARMA-GARCH models to correct for the effects of autocorrelation and conditional heteroscedastic terms. Maximum likelihood estimates of model parameters for the fitted Generalized Pareto Distribution (GPD) were computed. These techniques were applied to the daily returns of Bangko de Oro, Mega World Corporation, Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, SM Investments Corporation, and Universal Robina Corporation. A comparison of value at risk (VaR) estimates showed that as becomes smaller, VaR estimates under normal distribution tend to underestimate VaR while estimates under EVT approaches the empirical results. Backtesting using the Basel Committee three-zone approach to assess the accuracy of VaR models reveal that VaR models under normality are not able to capture extreme returns and therefore underestimate tail risk while VaR models under EVT have high probability of model accuracy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信