乌克兰版Haemo-Qol问卷的重测信度

A. Markin, L. Dubey
{"title":"乌克兰版Haemo-Qol问卷的重测信度","authors":"A. Markin, L. Dubey","doi":"10.21303/2504-5679.2018.00645","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Today psychometric characteristics of Ukrainian version of the questionnaire Haemo-QoL remain insufficiently researched. This publication describes the procedure and results of the test-retest reliability of this questionnaire in children with hemophilia A. Objectives: Study the test-retest reliability of the Ukrainian version of the Haemo-QoL questionnaire for assessing the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in children with hemophilia A, and determine the possibility of its use in practical and theoretical medicine in terms of time reliability. Methods: The quality of life assessment (QoLA) was performed using the correspondence method, by interviewing 32 children with hemophilia A (self-report) and 32 parents of the children (proxy-report). The questioning was conducted twice at intervals of 4-6 weeks (primary test and re-test). The Haemo-QoL questionnaire version of age group I (4-7 years old), II (8-12 years old) or age group III (13-16 years) was used to measure the quality of life in children with hemophilia; and three versions were used for parents of children of corresponding age groups. These interviews were analyzed, the correlation between the data of primary test and re-test was determined using Spearman's rho, Pearson correlation coefficients, Wilcoxon’s W criterion, Cohen's d effect size was determined for separate comparisons. Results: HRQoL indices are not statistically different between tests on all scales (p>0.05), except for the “Family” and “Others” scales (p<0.05). Total HRQoL is statistically different (p=0.0013), however, with a median difference of 0.25 only and an average absolute difference variability of 1.67 ± 1.51 (5.42 ± 2.83%). Total HRQoL in parent versions did not change statistically, unlike the children’s versions, but the difference between the tests was only 1.32 and Cohen’s d ES - 0.08. For versions Ip, IIp, IIIc/p there was no statistical difference, the versions Ic and II statistically differed (p=0.038; t=-2.39 and p=0.0022; t=-3.98, respectively) with a mean difference of 2.0 and 1.6, respectively. Conclusion: The Ukrainian version of the Haemo-QoL questionnaire has sufficient test-retest reliability for quantitative dynamic reflection HRQoL in patients with haemophilia A.","PeriodicalId":73665,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical cases & reports","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Test-Retest Reliability of Ukrainian Version of the Haemo-Qol Questionnaire\",\"authors\":\"A. Markin, L. Dubey\",\"doi\":\"10.21303/2504-5679.2018.00645\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Today psychometric characteristics of Ukrainian version of the questionnaire Haemo-QoL remain insufficiently researched. This publication describes the procedure and results of the test-retest reliability of this questionnaire in children with hemophilia A. Objectives: Study the test-retest reliability of the Ukrainian version of the Haemo-QoL questionnaire for assessing the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in children with hemophilia A, and determine the possibility of its use in practical and theoretical medicine in terms of time reliability. Methods: The quality of life assessment (QoLA) was performed using the correspondence method, by interviewing 32 children with hemophilia A (self-report) and 32 parents of the children (proxy-report). The questioning was conducted twice at intervals of 4-6 weeks (primary test and re-test). The Haemo-QoL questionnaire version of age group I (4-7 years old), II (8-12 years old) or age group III (13-16 years) was used to measure the quality of life in children with hemophilia; and three versions were used for parents of children of corresponding age groups. These interviews were analyzed, the correlation between the data of primary test and re-test was determined using Spearman's rho, Pearson correlation coefficients, Wilcoxon’s W criterion, Cohen's d effect size was determined for separate comparisons. Results: HRQoL indices are not statistically different between tests on all scales (p>0.05), except for the “Family” and “Others” scales (p<0.05). Total HRQoL is statistically different (p=0.0013), however, with a median difference of 0.25 only and an average absolute difference variability of 1.67 ± 1.51 (5.42 ± 2.83%). Total HRQoL in parent versions did not change statistically, unlike the children’s versions, but the difference between the tests was only 1.32 and Cohen’s d ES - 0.08. For versions Ip, IIp, IIIc/p there was no statistical difference, the versions Ic and II statistically differed (p=0.038; t=-2.39 and p=0.0022; t=-3.98, respectively) with a mean difference of 2.0 and 1.6, respectively. Conclusion: The Ukrainian version of the Haemo-QoL questionnaire has sufficient test-retest reliability for quantitative dynamic reflection HRQoL in patients with haemophilia A.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73665,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of clinical cases & reports\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of clinical cases & reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21303/2504-5679.2018.00645\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical cases & reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21303/2504-5679.2018.00645","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:目前乌克兰版Haemo-QoL问卷的心理测量特征研究还不够充分。目的:研究乌克兰版血友病A患儿健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)评估血友病A患儿健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)问卷的重测信度,并从时间信度方面确定其在实际和理论医学中应用的可能性。方法:采用通信法对32例A型血友病患儿(自我报告)和32例患儿家长(代理报告)进行生活质量评价(QoLA)。每隔4-6周进行2次问询(初测和复测)。采用I组(4-7岁)、II组(8-12岁)、III组(13-16岁)的血友病患儿血友病生活质量问卷(Haemo-QoL);三个版本分别用于相应年龄段儿童的父母。对这些访谈进行分析,采用Spearman’s rho、Pearson相关系数、Wilcoxon’s W标准、Cohen’s d效应量来确定一次检验和二次检验数据之间的相关性,进行单独比较。结果:各量表间HRQoL指标差异无统计学意义(p>0.05),但“Family”和“Others”量表间差异无统计学意义(p<0.05)。总HRQoL差异有统计学意义(p=0.0013),中位差异仅为0.25,平均绝对差异变异性为1.67±1.51(5.42±2.83%)。与儿童版本不同,父母版本的总HRQoL没有统计学变化,但测试之间的差异仅为1.32,Cohen 's d ES - 0.08。版本Ip、版本IIp、版本IIIc/p无统计学差异,版本Ic、版本II有统计学差异(p=0.038;T =-2.39, p=0.0022;T =-3.98),平均差值分别为2.0和1.6。结论乌克兰版血友病患者HRQoL问卷具有足够的重测信度,可定量动态反映血友病A患者的HRQoL。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Test-Retest Reliability of Ukrainian Version of the Haemo-Qol Questionnaire
Background: Today psychometric characteristics of Ukrainian version of the questionnaire Haemo-QoL remain insufficiently researched. This publication describes the procedure and results of the test-retest reliability of this questionnaire in children with hemophilia A. Objectives: Study the test-retest reliability of the Ukrainian version of the Haemo-QoL questionnaire for assessing the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in children with hemophilia A, and determine the possibility of its use in practical and theoretical medicine in terms of time reliability. Methods: The quality of life assessment (QoLA) was performed using the correspondence method, by interviewing 32 children with hemophilia A (self-report) and 32 parents of the children (proxy-report). The questioning was conducted twice at intervals of 4-6 weeks (primary test and re-test). The Haemo-QoL questionnaire version of age group I (4-7 years old), II (8-12 years old) or age group III (13-16 years) was used to measure the quality of life in children with hemophilia; and three versions were used for parents of children of corresponding age groups. These interviews were analyzed, the correlation between the data of primary test and re-test was determined using Spearman's rho, Pearson correlation coefficients, Wilcoxon’s W criterion, Cohen's d effect size was determined for separate comparisons. Results: HRQoL indices are not statistically different between tests on all scales (p>0.05), except for the “Family” and “Others” scales (p<0.05). Total HRQoL is statistically different (p=0.0013), however, with a median difference of 0.25 only and an average absolute difference variability of 1.67 ± 1.51 (5.42 ± 2.83%). Total HRQoL in parent versions did not change statistically, unlike the children’s versions, but the difference between the tests was only 1.32 and Cohen’s d ES - 0.08. For versions Ip, IIp, IIIc/p there was no statistical difference, the versions Ic and II statistically differed (p=0.038; t=-2.39 and p=0.0022; t=-3.98, respectively) with a mean difference of 2.0 and 1.6, respectively. Conclusion: The Ukrainian version of the Haemo-QoL questionnaire has sufficient test-retest reliability for quantitative dynamic reflection HRQoL in patients with haemophilia A.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信